International clinician perspectives on pandemic-associated stress in supporting people with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

Intellectual disability developmental disorders patients psychosocial interventions transcultural psychiatry

Journal

BJPsych open
ISSN: 2056-4724
Titre abrégé: BJPsych Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101667931

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 Apr 2022
Historique:
entrez: 18 4 2022
pubmed: 19 4 2022
medline: 19 4 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

People living with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) have suffered disproportionately in health outcomes and general well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. There is emerging evidence of increased psychological distress. Increased strain has also fallen on clinicians managing the psychological needs of people with IDD, in the context of learning new technologies, staff shortages, reduced services and paused training opportunities. To examine clinicians' experiences of patient care, clinical management and the impact of care delivery. A mixed fixed-response and free-text survey comprising 28 questions covering four areas (responder demographics, clinical practice, changes to local services and clinician experiences) was developed, using the STROBE guidance. It was disseminated through an exponential snowballing technique to clinicians in seven high-income countries. Quantitative data were analysed and presented with Microsoft Excel. Qualitative data were coded and thematically analysed, and presented with in-text quotations. There were 139 respondents, mostly senior physicians (71%). Two-thirds reported over 10 years working in the field. Quantitative findings include increased clinician stress (77%), referrals (53%), patient distress presentations (>70%), patient isolation (73%) and carer burden (89%), and reduced patient participation in daily activities (86%). A third reported increased psychotropic prescribing. Qualitative analysis outlined changes to clinical practice, particularly the emergence and impact of telehealth. In the countries surveyed, the pandemic has not only had a significant impact on people with IDD, but also their carers and clinicians. A proactive, holistic international response is needed in preparedness for future public health emergencies.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
People living with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) have suffered disproportionately in health outcomes and general well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. There is emerging evidence of increased psychological distress. Increased strain has also fallen on clinicians managing the psychological needs of people with IDD, in the context of learning new technologies, staff shortages, reduced services and paused training opportunities.
AIMS OBJECTIVE
To examine clinicians' experiences of patient care, clinical management and the impact of care delivery.
METHOD METHODS
A mixed fixed-response and free-text survey comprising 28 questions covering four areas (responder demographics, clinical practice, changes to local services and clinician experiences) was developed, using the STROBE guidance. It was disseminated through an exponential snowballing technique to clinicians in seven high-income countries. Quantitative data were analysed and presented with Microsoft Excel. Qualitative data were coded and thematically analysed, and presented with in-text quotations.
RESULTS RESULTS
There were 139 respondents, mostly senior physicians (71%). Two-thirds reported over 10 years working in the field. Quantitative findings include increased clinician stress (77%), referrals (53%), patient distress presentations (>70%), patient isolation (73%) and carer burden (89%), and reduced patient participation in daily activities (86%). A third reported increased psychotropic prescribing. Qualitative analysis outlined changes to clinical practice, particularly the emergence and impact of telehealth.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
In the countries surveyed, the pandemic has not only had a significant impact on people with IDD, but also their carers and clinicians. A proactive, holistic international response is needed in preparedness for future public health emergencies.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35431024
doi: 10.1192/bjo.2022.49
pii: S2056472422000497
pmc: PMC9059730
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e84

Références

Ir J Psychol Med. 2020 Sep;37(3):231-236
pubmed: 32404232
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2020 Nov;33(6):1523-1533
pubmed: 32885897
BJPsych Open. 2020 Oct 16;6(6):e123
pubmed: 33059790
BJPsych Open. 2021 Mar 19;7(2):e66
pubmed: 33736746
BJPsych Open. 2021 Dec 06;8(1):e7
pubmed: 34865678
Int J Dev Disabil. 2020 Jun 1;68(3):374-377
pubmed: 35603005
BJPsych Bull. 2021 May 12;:1-7
pubmed: 33977886
BJPsych Open. 2020 Oct 29;6(6):e128
pubmed: 33118913
J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;80(2):865-875
pubmed: 33554905
Int J Dev Disabil. 2020 May 15;68(2):234-236
pubmed: 35309704
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2021 Jan;56(1):25-37
pubmed: 32857218
Br J Psychiatry. 2022 Feb 17;:1-3
pubmed: 35172915

Auteurs

Joshua Howkins (J)

Department of Public Health, NHS Grampian, UK.

Angela Hassiotis (A)

Division of Psychiatry, University College London, UK.

Elspeth Bradley (E)

Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Canada.

Andrew Levitas (A)

Rowan University, USA.

Tanja Sappok (T)

Department for Mental Health, Charité University Hospital, Germany.

Amanda Sinai (A)

Department of Psychiatry, Mayanei Hayeshua Medical Center, Israel.

Anupam Thakur (A)

Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Canada.

Rohit Shankar (R)

Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, UK; and Cornwall Intellectual Disability Equitable Research (CIDER), University of Plymouth Peninsula School of Medicine, UK.

Classifications MeSH