Machine learning algorithm using publicly available echo database for simplified "visual estimation" of left ventricular ejection fraction.

Artificial intelligence Cardiac Deep learning Echocardiography Ejection fraction Point-of-care-ultrasound

Journal

World journal of experimental medicine
ISSN: 2220-315X
Titre abrégé: World J Exp Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101618808

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 Mar 2022
Historique:
received: 11 10 2021
revised: 14 12 2021
accepted: 06 03 2022
entrez: 18 4 2022
pubmed: 19 4 2022
medline: 19 4 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Left ventricular ejection fraction calculation automation typically requires complex algorithms and is dependent of optimal visualization and tracing of endocardial borders. This significantly limits usability in bedside clinical applications, where ultrasound automation is needed most. To create a simple deep learning (DL) regression-type algorithm to visually estimate left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) from a public database of actual patient echo examinations and compare results to echocardiography laboratory EF calculations. A simple DL architecture previously proven to perform well on ultrasound image analysis, VGG16, was utilized as a base architecture running within a long short term memory algorithm for sequential image (video) analysis. After obtaining permission to use the Stanford EchoNet-Dynamic database, researchers randomly removed approximately 15% of the approximately 10036 echo apical 4-chamber videos for later performance testing. All database echo examinations were read as part of comprehensive echocardiography study performance and were coupled with EF, end systolic and diastolic volumes, key frames and coordinates for LV endocardial tracing in csv file. To better reflect point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) clinical settings and time pressure, the algorithm was trained on echo video correlated with calculated ejection fraction without incorporating additional volume, measurement and coordinate data. Seventy percent of the original data was used for algorithm training and 15% for validation during training. The previously randomly separated 15% (1263 echo videos) was used for algorithm performance testing after training completion. Given the inherent variability of echo EF measurement and field standards for evaluating algorithm accuracy, mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE) calculations were made on algorithm EF results compared to Echo Lab calculated EF. Bland-Atlman calculation was also performed. MAE for skilled echocardiographers has been established to range from 4% to 5%. The DL algorithm visually estimated EF had a MAE of 8.08% (95%CI 7.60 to 8.55) suggesting good performance compared to highly skill humans. The RMSE was 11.98 and correlation of 0.348. This experimental simplified DL algorithm showed promise and proved reasonably accurate at visually estimating LV EF from short real time echo video clips. Less burdensome than complex DL approaches used for EF calculation, such an approach may be more optimal for POCUS settings once improved upon by future research and development.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Left ventricular ejection fraction calculation automation typically requires complex algorithms and is dependent of optimal visualization and tracing of endocardial borders. This significantly limits usability in bedside clinical applications, where ultrasound automation is needed most.
AIM OBJECTIVE
To create a simple deep learning (DL) regression-type algorithm to visually estimate left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) from a public database of actual patient echo examinations and compare results to echocardiography laboratory EF calculations.
METHODS METHODS
A simple DL architecture previously proven to perform well on ultrasound image analysis, VGG16, was utilized as a base architecture running within a long short term memory algorithm for sequential image (video) analysis. After obtaining permission to use the Stanford EchoNet-Dynamic database, researchers randomly removed approximately 15% of the approximately 10036 echo apical 4-chamber videos for later performance testing. All database echo examinations were read as part of comprehensive echocardiography study performance and were coupled with EF, end systolic and diastolic volumes, key frames and coordinates for LV endocardial tracing in csv file. To better reflect point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) clinical settings and time pressure, the algorithm was trained on echo video correlated with calculated ejection fraction without incorporating additional volume, measurement and coordinate data. Seventy percent of the original data was used for algorithm training and 15% for validation during training. The previously randomly separated 15% (1263 echo videos) was used for algorithm performance testing after training completion. Given the inherent variability of echo EF measurement and field standards for evaluating algorithm accuracy, mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE) calculations were made on algorithm EF results compared to Echo Lab calculated EF. Bland-Atlman calculation was also performed. MAE for skilled echocardiographers has been established to range from 4% to 5%.
RESULTS RESULTS
The DL algorithm visually estimated EF had a MAE of 8.08% (95%CI 7.60 to 8.55) suggesting good performance compared to highly skill humans. The RMSE was 11.98 and correlation of 0.348.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
This experimental simplified DL algorithm showed promise and proved reasonably accurate at visually estimating LV EF from short real time echo video clips. Less burdensome than complex DL approaches used for EF calculation, such an approach may be more optimal for POCUS settings once improved upon by future research and development.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35433318
doi: 10.5493/wjem.v12.i2.16
pmc: PMC8968469
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

16-25

Informations de copyright

©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict-of-interest statement: Blaivas M consults for Anavasi Diagnostics, EthosMedical, HERO Medical and Sonosim.

Références

Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2019 Jun;14(6):1027-1037
pubmed: 30941679
J Interprof Care. 2021 Jan-Feb;35(1):37-45
pubmed: 31865827
Diagnostics (Basel). 2019 Oct 18;9(4):
pubmed: 31635219
Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2021 Oct;18(5):290-303
pubmed: 34398411
JACC CardioOncol. 2021 Jun 15;3(2):191-200
pubmed: 34396324
Heart Lung Circ. 2020 May;29(5):703-709
pubmed: 31320256
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2021 May;11(5):1763-1781
pubmed: 33936963
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015 Oct;28(10):1171-1181, e2
pubmed: 26209911
J Med Ultrason (2001). 2022 Jan;49(1):35-43
pubmed: 34322777
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2021 Aug 1;321(2):H390-H399
pubmed: 34170197
Echocardiography. 1994 Jan;11(1):1-9
pubmed: 10150561
Eur Heart J. 1997 Jul;18(7):1175-85
pubmed: 9243153
Intensive Care Med. 2019 Jun;45(6):770-788
pubmed: 30911808
Acad Emerg Med. 2002 Mar;9(3):186-93
pubmed: 11874773
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Jun 1;6(6):624-632
pubmed: 33599681
J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Jul;29(3):193-204
pubmed: 34080347
Echocardiography. 2019 Dec;36(12):2145-2151
pubmed: 31786824
Acad Emerg Med. 2001 Jun;8(6):616-21
pubmed: 11388936
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Jun;14(6):e012293
pubmed: 34126754
Heart Fail Clin. 2021 Jul;17(3):447-462
pubmed: 34051976
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2021 Apr;47(4):1120-1125
pubmed: 33451814
Int J Nurs Stud. 2019 Oct;98:57-66
pubmed: 31284161
J Ultrasound Med. 2022 Apr;41(4):855-863
pubmed: 34133034
Ann Emerg Med. 1992 Jun;21(6):709-12
pubmed: 1590612
J Ultrasound Med. 2020 Jun;39(6):1187-1194
pubmed: 31872477
Int J Cardiol. 2005 May 25;101(2):209-12
pubmed: 15882665
Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2019 Jun 27;22(4):273-278
pubmed: 34760569
Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 14;42(7):789-797
pubmed: 32974648

Auteurs

Michael Blaivas (M)

Department of Medicine, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Roswell, GA 30076, United States. mike@blaivas.org.

Laura Blaivas (L)

Department of Environmental Science, Michigan State University, Roswell, Georgia 30076, United States.

Classifications MeSH