Strengthening biological security after COVID-19: Using cartoons for engaging life science stakeholders with the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC).

Awareness Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention Biological security Cartoon Engagement Life sciences

Journal

Journal of biosafety and biosecurity
ISSN: 2588-9338
Titre abrégé: J Biosaf Biosecur
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101765814

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2022
Historique:
received: 01 03 2022
revised: 24 03 2022
accepted: 31 03 2022
pubmed: 19 4 2022
medline: 19 4 2022
entrez: 18 4 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The devastating effects of the COVID-19 pandemic have acutely shown the need for maintaining robust international and national systems for biological security and ensuring that life sciences are used only for peaceful purposes. Life science stakeholders can play an important role in safeguarding scientific and technological advances in biology and related fields against accidental or deliberate misuse, not least because they are on the frontlines of driving innovation. In this paper, we argue that enhancing awareness and understanding of the risk of deliberate disease is essential for effective biological security. We first discuss the issue of 'dual use' in science and technology as it relates to disarmament and non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Second, we review how scientist engagement with dual-use risks has been addressed in the context of the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC). Third, we report on the development of an innovative awareness-raising tool, a cartoon series, that can be used for engaging life science stakeholders with BTWC issues. Finally, we outline a set of practical considerations for promoting sustainable life science engagement with the BTWC.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35434539
doi: 10.1016/j.jobb.2022.03.001
pii: S2588-9338(22)00004-8
pmc: PMC9005366
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

68-74

Informations de copyright

© 2022 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.

Références

Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2006 Fall;15(4):432-9; discussion 439-47
pubmed: 17066768

Auteurs

Tatyana Novossiolova (T)

The Law Program of the Center for the Study of Democracy, Bulgaria.

Simon Whitby (S)

Division of Peace Studies University of Bradford, Bradford, United Kingdom.

Malcolm Dando (M)

Division of Peace Studies University of Bradford, Bradford, United Kingdom.
Biological Security Research Centre, London Metropolitan University, London, United Kingdom.

Lijun Shang (L)

School of Human Sciences, London Metropolitan University, London, United Kingdom.
Biological Security Research Centre, London Metropolitan University, London, United Kingdom.

Classifications MeSH