Automated Intraoperative Short Messaging Service Updates: Quality Improvement Initiative to Relieve Caregivers' Worries.
COVID-19
OR nurse
SMS
anxiety
caregiver
communication
digital health
digital health care
intraoperative
mHealth
mental health
perioperative
short messaging service
surgery
surgical
surgical procedure
technology
text message
Journal
JMIR perioperative medicine
ISSN: 2561-9128
Titre abrégé: JMIR Perioper Med
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101771348
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 May 2022
06 May 2022
Historique:
received:
05
01
2022
accepted:
14
04
2022
revised:
11
02
2022
pubmed:
19
4
2022
medline:
19
4
2022
entrez:
18
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Undergoing a surgical procedure is anxiety provoking for patients and their caregivers. During the intraoperative period, caregivers seek out informational updates from health care professionals, a situation complicated by COVID-19 health measures that require caregivers to wait outside the hospital. Short messaging service (SMS)-based communication that allows caregivers to follow their loved ones through surgery has shown promise in relieving anxiety and improving satisfaction with overall care. This form of communication is also well accepted by health care professionals and may be effective at relieving staff burden. Here, we describe a quality improvement initiative of a standardized and integrated intraoperative SMS-based system to improve communication between surgical teams and caregivers. The main goal was to improve satisfaction with care, while the secondary goal was to reduce caregiver anxiety. The initiative followed the framework of the Model for Improvement. A large tertiary care hospital offered the SMS to caregivers who were waiting for loved ones undergoing surgery. SMS messages were integrated into the clinical information system software and sent at key points during the surgical journey to phone numbers provided by caregivers. A satisfaction survey was sent to caregivers 1 business day after surgery. Data were collected between February 16 and July 14, 2021. Of the 8129 surgeries scheduled, caregivers waiting for 6149 (75.6%) surgeries agreed to receive SMS messages. A total of 34,129 messages were sent. The satisfaction survey was completed by 2088 (34%) of the 6149 caregivers. Satisfaction with messages was high, with the majority of respondents reporting that the messages received were adequate (1476/2085, 70.8%), clear (1545/2077, 74.4%), informative (1488/2078, 71.6%), and met their needs (1234/2077, 59.4%). The overall satisfaction score was high (4.5 out of 5), and caregivers reported that receiving text messages resulted in a reduction in anxiety (score=8.2 out of 10). Technical errors were reported by 69 (3.3%) caregivers. Suggestions for improvements included having messages sent more often; providing greater patient details, including the patient's health status; and the service being offered in other languages. This digital health initiative provided SMS messages that were systematically sent to caregivers waiting for their loved ones undergoing surgery, just as COVID-19 restrictions began preventing waiting onsite. The messages were used across 15 surgical specialties and have since been implemented hospital-wide. Digital health care innovations have the capacity to improve family-centered communication; what patients and their families find useful and appreciate will ultimately determine their success.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Undergoing a surgical procedure is anxiety provoking for patients and their caregivers. During the intraoperative period, caregivers seek out informational updates from health care professionals, a situation complicated by COVID-19 health measures that require caregivers to wait outside the hospital. Short messaging service (SMS)-based communication that allows caregivers to follow their loved ones through surgery has shown promise in relieving anxiety and improving satisfaction with overall care. This form of communication is also well accepted by health care professionals and may be effective at relieving staff burden.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
Here, we describe a quality improvement initiative of a standardized and integrated intraoperative SMS-based system to improve communication between surgical teams and caregivers. The main goal was to improve satisfaction with care, while the secondary goal was to reduce caregiver anxiety.
METHODS
METHODS
The initiative followed the framework of the Model for Improvement. A large tertiary care hospital offered the SMS to caregivers who were waiting for loved ones undergoing surgery. SMS messages were integrated into the clinical information system software and sent at key points during the surgical journey to phone numbers provided by caregivers. A satisfaction survey was sent to caregivers 1 business day after surgery. Data were collected between February 16 and July 14, 2021.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Of the 8129 surgeries scheduled, caregivers waiting for 6149 (75.6%) surgeries agreed to receive SMS messages. A total of 34,129 messages were sent. The satisfaction survey was completed by 2088 (34%) of the 6149 caregivers. Satisfaction with messages was high, with the majority of respondents reporting that the messages received were adequate (1476/2085, 70.8%), clear (1545/2077, 74.4%), informative (1488/2078, 71.6%), and met their needs (1234/2077, 59.4%). The overall satisfaction score was high (4.5 out of 5), and caregivers reported that receiving text messages resulted in a reduction in anxiety (score=8.2 out of 10). Technical errors were reported by 69 (3.3%) caregivers. Suggestions for improvements included having messages sent more often; providing greater patient details, including the patient's health status; and the service being offered in other languages.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This digital health initiative provided SMS messages that were systematically sent to caregivers waiting for their loved ones undergoing surgery, just as COVID-19 restrictions began preventing waiting onsite. The messages were used across 15 surgical specialties and have since been implemented hospital-wide. Digital health care innovations have the capacity to improve family-centered communication; what patients and their families find useful and appreciate will ultimately determine their success.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35436760
pii: v5i1e36208
doi: 10.2196/36208
pmc: PMC9084444
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e36208Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
©Alexandre Mignault, Éric Tchouaket Nguemeleu, Stephanie Robins, Éric Maillet, Edwige Matetsa, Stéphane Dupuis. Originally published in JMIR Perioperative Medicine (http://periop.jmir.org), 06.05.2022.
Références
Int J Behav Med. 2019 Jun;26(3):316-322
pubmed: 30793258
J Perianesth Nurs. 2012 Feb;27(1):3-9
pubmed: 22264615
AORN J. 2014 May;99(5):594-9
pubmed: 24766921
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021 May 27;281:921-925
pubmed: 34042808
AORN J. 2016 Apr;103(4):414-20
pubmed: 27004504
J Fam Nurs. 2010 Nov;16(4):435-61
pubmed: 21051758
AORN J. 2011 Oct;94(4):385-92
pubmed: 21967912
Ann Surg. 2022 Jan 1;275(1):e75-e81
pubmed: 32649458
Telemed J E Health. 2016 Nov;22(11):921-928
pubmed: 27192359
JAMA. 2020 Jun 16;323(23):2381-2382
pubmed: 32463421
J Perianesth Nurs. 2014 Apr;29(2):119-28
pubmed: 24661481
AORN J. 2011 Sep;94(3):246-53
pubmed: 21884844
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Nov;123:104058
pubmed: 34454334
J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2021 Apr 19;8(2):107-112
pubmed: 33898642
Indian J Orthop. 2020 Jan 13;54(2):208-214
pubmed: 32257039
Patient Saf Surg. 2015 May 23;9:21
pubmed: 26136830
OR Manager. 2016 Aug;32(8):20-4
pubmed: 30010271
Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2015 Sep-Oct;34(5):285-8
pubmed: 26244244
Biomed Instrum Technol. 2013 Fall;Suppl:64-7
pubmed: 24111774
J Surg Res. 2021 Jul;263:1-4
pubmed: 33618217
Minerva Anestesiol. 2018 Nov;84(11):1307-1317
pubmed: 29624026
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jun 16;9(6):e20199
pubmed: 34132646
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Aug;60(2):e93-e97
pubmed: 32333961
J Clin Anesth. 2001 Nov;13(7):478-81
pubmed: 11704443
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2013 May;64(5):402-6
pubmed: 23741561
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2019 Dec;55:102755
pubmed: 31515006
AORN J. 2010 Aug;92(2):158-68
pubmed: 20678605
AORN J. 1996 Sep;64(3):424-5, 428-36
pubmed: 8876922
Am J Surg. 2017 May;213(5):895-900
pubmed: 28372788
J Med Syst. 2015 Jan;39(1):181
pubmed: 25486895
J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Nov;219(5):958-67
pubmed: 25256372
Res Nurs Health. 2002 Feb;25(1):58-67
pubmed: 11807920
Telemed J E Health. 2018 Jun;24(6):406-414
pubmed: 29111887
Springerplus. 2013 May 14;2(1):222
pubmed: 23853744
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Dec;50:679-682
pubmed: 34879486
JMIR Perioper Med. 2020 Jan 15;3(1):e14601
pubmed: 33393931
J Pediatr Nurs. 2020 May - Jun;52:e42-e50
pubmed: 31983480
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Feb;41(4):E225-30
pubmed: 26579957
Internet Interv. 2018 Jun 21;13:82-104
pubmed: 30206523
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 Sep;28(5):e13116
pubmed: 31184790
J Perianesth Nurs. 2009 Aug;24(4):244-6
pubmed: 19647662
J Perinatol. 2016 Sep;36(9):739-43
pubmed: 27195981
West J Nurs Res. 2010 Oct;32(6):794-813
pubmed: 20696847
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Oct;113:213-217
pubmed: 30173988
AORN J. 2010 Aug;92(2):150-7
pubmed: 20678604