Barriers to Telemedicine Video Visits for Older Adults in Independent Living Facilities: Mixed Methods Cross-sectional Needs Assessment.
access
accessibility
barrier
barriers to access to care
community care
cross-sectional
e-visit
eHealth
elder
geriatric
gerontology
independent living
mixed method
need assessment
older adults
telehealth
telemedicine
Journal
JMIR aging
ISSN: 2561-7605
Titre abrégé: JMIR Aging
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101740387
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 Apr 2022
19 Apr 2022
Historique:
received:
18
10
2021
accepted:
07
02
2022
revised:
09
01
2022
entrez:
19
4
2022
pubmed:
20
4
2022
medline:
20
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Despite the increasing availability of telemedicine video visits during the COVID-19 pandemic, older adults have greater challenges in getting care through telemedicine. We aim to better understand the barriers to telemedicine in community-dwelling older adults to improve the access to and experience of virtual visits. We conducted a mixed methods needs assessment of older adults at two independent living facilities (sites A and B) in Northern California between September 2020 and March 2021. Voluntary surveys were distributed. Semistructured interviews were then conducted with participants who provided contact information. Surveys ascertained participants' preferred devices as well as comfort level, support, and top barriers regarding telephonic and video visits. Qualitative analysis of transcribed interviews identified key themes. Survey respondents' (N=249) average age was 84.6 (SD 6.6) years, and 76.7% (n=191) of the participants were female. At site A, 88.9% (111/125) had a bachelor's degree or beyond, and 99.2% (124/125) listed English as their preferred language. At site B, 42.9% (51/119) had a bachelor's degree or beyond, and 13.4% (16/119) preferred English, while 73.1% (87/119) preferred Mandarin. Regarding video visits, 36.5% (91/249) of all participants felt comfortable connecting with their health care team through video visits. Regarding top barriers, participants at site A reported not knowing how to connect to the platform (30/125, 24%), not being familiar with the technology (28/125, 22.4%), and having difficulty hearing (19/125, 15.2%), whereas for site B, the top barriers were not being able to speak English well (65/119, 54.6%), lack of familiarity with technology and the internet (44/119, 36.9%), and lack of interest in seeing providers outside of the clinic (42/119, 35.3%). Three key themes emerged from the follow-up interviews (n=15): (1) the perceived limitations of video visits, (2) the overwhelming process of learning the technology for telemedicine, and (3) the desire for in-person or on-demand help with telemedicine. Substantial barriers exist for older adults in connecting with their health care team through telemedicine, particularly through video visits. The largest barriers include difficulty with technology or using the video visit platform, hearing difficulty, language barriers, and lack of desire to see providers virtually. Efforts to improve telemedicine access for older adults should take into account patient perspectives.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Despite the increasing availability of telemedicine video visits during the COVID-19 pandemic, older adults have greater challenges in getting care through telemedicine.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
We aim to better understand the barriers to telemedicine in community-dwelling older adults to improve the access to and experience of virtual visits.
METHODS
METHODS
We conducted a mixed methods needs assessment of older adults at two independent living facilities (sites A and B) in Northern California between September 2020 and March 2021. Voluntary surveys were distributed. Semistructured interviews were then conducted with participants who provided contact information. Surveys ascertained participants' preferred devices as well as comfort level, support, and top barriers regarding telephonic and video visits. Qualitative analysis of transcribed interviews identified key themes.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Survey respondents' (N=249) average age was 84.6 (SD 6.6) years, and 76.7% (n=191) of the participants were female. At site A, 88.9% (111/125) had a bachelor's degree or beyond, and 99.2% (124/125) listed English as their preferred language. At site B, 42.9% (51/119) had a bachelor's degree or beyond, and 13.4% (16/119) preferred English, while 73.1% (87/119) preferred Mandarin. Regarding video visits, 36.5% (91/249) of all participants felt comfortable connecting with their health care team through video visits. Regarding top barriers, participants at site A reported not knowing how to connect to the platform (30/125, 24%), not being familiar with the technology (28/125, 22.4%), and having difficulty hearing (19/125, 15.2%), whereas for site B, the top barriers were not being able to speak English well (65/119, 54.6%), lack of familiarity with technology and the internet (44/119, 36.9%), and lack of interest in seeing providers outside of the clinic (42/119, 35.3%). Three key themes emerged from the follow-up interviews (n=15): (1) the perceived limitations of video visits, (2) the overwhelming process of learning the technology for telemedicine, and (3) the desire for in-person or on-demand help with telemedicine.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Substantial barriers exist for older adults in connecting with their health care team through telemedicine, particularly through video visits. The largest barriers include difficulty with technology or using the video visit platform, hearing difficulty, language barriers, and lack of desire to see providers virtually. Efforts to improve telemedicine access for older adults should take into account patient perspectives.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35438648
pii: v5i2e34326
doi: 10.2196/34326
pmc: PMC9066341
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e34326Informations de copyright
©Alice Mao, Lydia Tam, Audrey Xu, Kim Osborn, Meera Sheffrin, Christine Gould, Erika Schillinger, Marina Martin, Matthew Mesias. Originally published in JMIR Aging (https://aging.jmir.org), 19.04.2022.
Références
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Aug;67(8):1737-1749
pubmed: 31066916
Telemed J E Health. 2020 May;26(5):571-573
pubmed: 32275485
Curr Aging Sci. 2019;11(4):202-215
pubmed: 30836931
J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Jul;24(7):1692-1697
pubmed: 32385614
N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 19;377(16):1585-1592
pubmed: 29045204
Telemed J E Health. 2008 Sep;14(7):647-55
pubmed: 18817493
JMIR Aging. 2020 Nov 10;3(2):e23176
pubmed: 33048821
JMIR Cardio. 2021 Jan 22;5(1):e25074
pubmed: 33385234
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 30;382(18):1679-1681
pubmed: 32160451
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Sep;69(9):2404-2411
pubmed: 33848360
JMIR Aging. 2021 Apr 23;4(2):e28010
pubmed: 33739929
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Oct 1;180(10):1386-1389
pubmed: 32744601
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014 Dec 24;9:25-40
pubmed: 25565781
J Telemed Telecare. 2021 Nov 26;:1357633X211058340
pubmed: 34825609
Hand (N Y). 2021 Sep 13;:15589447211030692
pubmed: 34515550
Clin Gerontol. 2020 Mar-Apr;43(2):193-203
pubmed: 31431147
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 12;11(10):e053440
pubmed: 34642200
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Oct 1;180(10):1389-1391
pubmed: 32744593
Int Health. 2022 May 2;14(3):329-331
pubmed: 34555846
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Jun 16;75(23):2989-2991
pubmed: 32475633
Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 Feb;40(2):349-358
pubmed: 33523745
Ann Intern Med. 2022 Jan;175(1):145-148
pubmed: 34748380
Psychol Serv. 2012 May;9(2):144-62
pubmed: 22662729
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2021 Jul 16;23(9):115
pubmed: 34269884
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Oct;69(10):2732-2740
pubmed: 34224577