Clinical Evaluations of Macular Structure-Function Concordance With and Without Drasdo Displacement.
Journal
Translational vision science & technology
ISSN: 2164-2591
Titre abrégé: Transl Vis Sci Technol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101595919
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 04 2022
01 04 2022
Historique:
entrez:
19
4
2022
pubmed:
20
4
2022
medline:
22
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study was to compare concordance between ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) data from the Cirrus optical coherence tomographer (OCT) Ganglion Cell Analysis (GCA) and visual fields (VFs), with and without Drasdo displacement. From 296 open-angle glaucoma participants, GCIPL deviation and raw thickness data were extracted over locations per the 10-2 VF test grid, with and without application of Drasdo displacement, with global and eccentricity-dependent sensitivities and specificities calculated for both. With OCT and VF data classified as within or outside normative limits, pattern deviation values were compared using paired t-tests and Spearman correlations. Regression models were applied to pattern deviation values as a function of GCIPL thickness, and differences in model performance with and without displacement were compared using extra sums-of-squares F tests. There were small but significant improvements in global specificity without displacement (0.58-0.59 with displacement and 0.61 without displacement), without notable differences in sensitivity (0.77-0.78 with displacement and 0.76-0.78 without displacement). At abnormal VF locations and without displacement, a higher proportion of correct OCT classifications (P = 0.0008) and significant correlation with worsening pattern deviation values were observed (r = 0.50, P = 0.002). Regression models indicated significantly steeper slopes with Drasdo displacement centrally (P = 0.002-0.04). With GCA deviation maps, small improvements in structure-function concordance were observed without displacement, which are unlikely to be clinically meaningful. Using GCIPL thickness data, significantly better structure-function concordance was observed centrally with Drasdo displacement. Applying Drasdo displacement on probability-based reports is unlikely to alter clinical impressions of structure-function concordance, but applying displacement with GCIPL thickness data may improve detection of structure-function concordance.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35438719
pii: 2778757
doi: 10.1167/tvst.11.4.18
pmc: PMC9034708
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
18Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Références
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 28;10(1):18527
pubmed: 33116253
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018 Apr 1;59(5):1693-1703
pubmed: 29610852
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020 Apr 9;61(4):10
pubmed: 32293667
Biomed Opt Express. 2013 Jun 14;4(7):1133-52
pubmed: 23847738
Am J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jan;209:117-131
pubmed: 31469999
Arch Ophthalmol. 2011 Dec;129(12):1529-36
pubmed: 22159673
Semin Ophthalmol. 2017;32(6):682-688
pubmed: 27404600
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2021 Feb 5;10(2):7
pubmed: 34003891
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 18;9(1):14990
pubmed: 31628401
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Sep;45(9):3099-106
pubmed: 15326126
Br J Ophthalmol. 1974 Aug;58(8):709-14
pubmed: 4433482
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015 Sep;56(10):5984-9
pubmed: 26393464
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017 Jun 1;58(7):3086-3099
pubmed: 28632847
Ophthalmology. 2021 Oct;128(10):1405-1416
pubmed: 33722636
Clin Exp Optom. 2017 Jul;100(4):313-332
pubmed: 28640951
Am J Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec;208:166-177
pubmed: 31078539
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015 Oct;56(11):6473-82
pubmed: 26447981
Acta Ophthalmol. 2014 May;92(3):e185-93
pubmed: 24456145
Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2020 Jul - Aug;3(4):274-287
pubmed: 33012332
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1999 Dec;237(12):1014-23
pubmed: 10654171
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Sep;45(9):3152-60
pubmed: 15326134
Lancet. 2017 Nov 11;390(10108):2183-2193
pubmed: 28577860
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019 Oct 1;60(13):4241-4248
pubmed: 31618760
Ophthalmology. 2000 Oct;107(10):1809-15
pubmed: 11013178
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Sep 1;57(11):4815-23
pubmed: 27623336
Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 12;9(1):11603
pubmed: 31406197
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Feb 03;55(2):632-49
pubmed: 24370831
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017 Jul 1;135(7):742-747
pubmed: 28542692
Vision Res. 2007 Oct;47(22):2901-11
pubmed: 17320143
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020 Sep 1;61(11):29
pubmed: 32936302
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar;31(2):85-90
pubmed: 31922980
J Neurosci. 2020 Oct 14;40(42):8132-8148
pubmed: 33009001
Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2005 Aug;83(4):448-55
pubmed: 16029269
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 1;8(1):2172
pubmed: 29391459
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017 Sep 1;58(11):4863-4876
pubmed: 28973333
BMC Ophthalmol. 2017 Mar 11;17(1):22
pubmed: 28283025
Am J Ophthalmol. 2006 Jan;141(1):24-30
pubmed: 16386972