Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Management of Postdural Puncture Headache With Epidural Blood Patch for Obstetric Patients in New York State.
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 04 2022
01 04 2022
Historique:
entrez:
21
4
2022
pubmed:
22
4
2022
medline:
26
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Characterizing and addressing racial and ethnic disparities in peripartum pain assessment and treatment is a national priority. To evaluate the association of race and ethnicity with the provision and timing of an epidural blood patch (EBP) for management of postdural puncture headache in obstetric patients. This cross-sectional study used New York State hospital discharge records from January 1, 1998, to December 31, 2016, from mothers 15 to 49 years of age with a postdural puncture headache after neuraxial analgesia or anesthesia for childbirth. Statistical analysis was performed from February 2020 to February 2022. Patients' race and ethnicity (reported as provided by each participating hospital; the method of determining race and ethnicity [ie, self-reported or not] cannot be determined from the data) were categorized into non-Hispanic White (reference group), non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, and other race and ethnicity (including Asian and Pacific Islander, American Indian, Alaskan Native, and other). The primary outcome was the rate of EBP use. The secondary outcome was the interval (days) between hospital admission and provision of EBP. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs of EBP use associated with race and ethnicity were estimated using mixed-effect logistic regression models, adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics. During the study period, 8921 patients (mean [SD] age, 30 [6] years; 1028 [11.5%] Black; 1301 [14.6%] Hispanic; 4960 [55.6%] White; and 1359 [15.2%] other race and ethnicity) with postdural puncture headache were identified among 1.9 million deliveries with a neuraxial procedure. Of these 8921 patients, 4196 (47.0%; 95% CI, 46.0%-48.1%) were managed with an EBP. A total of 2650 White patients (53.4%; 95% CI, 52.0%-54.8%) used an EBP; this rate was significantly higher than that among Hispanic patients (41.7% [543]; 95% CI, 39.9%-44.5%), Black patients (35.7% [367]; 95% CI, 32.8%-38.7%), or patients of other race and ethnicity (35.2% [478]; 95% CI, 32.6%-37.8%). Timing of EBP was at a median of 2 days (IQR, 2-3 days) after hospital admission for White patients compared with a median of 3 days (IQR, 2-4 days) for Hispanic patients, Black patients, and patients of other race and ethnicity (P < .001 for the comparison with White patients). After adjustment for patient and hospital characteristics, the EBP rate was not different between White and Hispanic patients (adjusted OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.94-1.30). It was significantly lower for Black patients (adjusted OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67-0.94) and patients of other races and ethnicities (adjusted OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.73-0.99). In this study, significant racial and ethnic disparities in the management of postdural puncture headache with EBP were observed, with both lower rates and delayed timing, which may be associated with long-term adverse effects.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35446394
pii: 2791436
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.8520
pmc: PMC9024387
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e228520Références
J Clin Anesth. 2020 Oct;65:109821
pubmed: 32408963
Pain. 2008 Nov 15;140(1):87-94
pubmed: 18818022
Anesth Analg. 2021 Aug 1;133(2):340-348
pubmed: 34257195
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Dec;134(6):1147-1153
pubmed: 31764723
Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Feb 1;137(2):220-224
pubmed: 33416278
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 May;131(5):e140-e150
pubmed: 29683911
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Dec 7;1(8):e186567
pubmed: 30646335
Am J Public Health. 1997 Nov;87(11):1773-8
pubmed: 9366634
Anesth Analg. 2002 Aug;95(2):423-9, table of contents
pubmed: 12145065
Anesthesiology. 2018 Jul;129(1):192-215
pubmed: 29561267
Cephalalgia. 2018 Jan;38(1):1-211
pubmed: 29368949
JAMA Neurol. 2020 Jan 1;77(1):65-72
pubmed: 31524925
Anesth Analg. 2016 Feb;122(2):472-9
pubmed: 26797554
Semin Perinatol. 2017 Aug;41(5):293-298
pubmed: 28600029
Anesth Analg. 2019 Nov;129(5):1328-1336
pubmed: 31335402
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jan;214(1):122.e1-7
pubmed: 26283457
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jul;225(1):83.e1-83.e9
pubmed: 33453183
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2019 May;38:104-118
pubmed: 30711239
BJOG. 2015 Dec;122(13):1748-55
pubmed: 25559311
N Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 16;376(7):608-610
pubmed: 28199802
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Jan;52(1S1):S86-S94
pubmed: 27989297
Anesthesiology. 2007 Jan;106(1):19-25; discussion 6-8
pubmed: 17197841
CMAJ. 1993 Oct 15;149(8):1087-93
pubmed: 8221447
Anesth Analg. 2020 Sep;131(3):850-856
pubmed: 31804407
Br J Anaesth. 2021 Oct;127(4):600-607
pubmed: 34548152
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Apr 19;113(16):4296-301
pubmed: 27044069
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2017 Feb;29:5-7
pubmed: 28089183
Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Oct;124(4):782-786
pubmed: 25198266
Anesth Analg. 2012 Jan;114(1):172-8
pubmed: 22075013
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Dec;134(6):1155-1162
pubmed: 31764724
Semin Perinatol. 2014 Oct;38(6):386-94
pubmed: 25146108
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 1;363(1):45-53
pubmed: 20463332
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Nov;122(5):957-965
pubmed: 24104771
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 May;131(5):770-782
pubmed: 29683895
Am J Public Health. 2006 Dec;96(12):2113-21
pubmed: 17077411
Anesth Analg. 2012 Jul;115(1):124-32
pubmed: 22467897
Anesth Analg. 2016 Jun;122(6):1947-56
pubmed: 27195637
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Aug;191(2):456-62
pubmed: 15343221