Vesicourachal diverticulum.
Bladder injury
Cystogram
Laparoscopic appendectomy
Urachus
Vesicourachal diverticulum
Journal
Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England
ISSN: 1478-7083
Titre abrégé: Ann R Coll Surg Engl
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7506860
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2022
Nov 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
22
4
2022
medline:
3
11
2022
entrez:
21
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We report a rare complication involving a healthy 45-year-old male patient who underwent an emergency laparoscopic appendicectomy for acute perforated gangrenous appendicitis. The patient was catheterised pre- procedure and the ports were inserted under vision. Upon completion of the procedure, a 15 Fr Robinson drain was left in the pelvis and was fed through the suprapubic port hole. Postoperatively the patient developed worsening, generalised abdominal pain and high output from the drain. The patient was re-catheterised but the computed tomography (CT) cystogram did not show any injury to the bladder. The drain fluid creatinine was noted to be raised (>4,000), indicating that urine was leaking into the drain. Conventional cystogram confirmed a contrast leak from the dome around the drain. Flexible cystoscopy confirmed that the drain had transversed the vesicourachal diverticula. The drain was pulled back and converted to a suprapubic catheter with the patient subsequently being discharged. Vesicourachal diverticula is a rare and often asymptomatic anomaly. When undertaking laparoscopic surgery, precautions should be taken to prevent port site injury such as catheterising the patient to ensure the bladder is empty and inserting the ports under direct vision. It is safer to visualise muscle rather than peritoneum during port insertion. In this case, the bladder diverticula was noticed extraperitoneally. Though the indirect CT cystogram reported no injury, this was unreliable as the bladder was not distended which led to the subtle injury being missed. Traditional cystogram should be considered in cases with a negative CT cystogram and a strong suspicion of bladder injury.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35446699
doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2021.0344
pmc: PMC9685905
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e255-e257Références
J Surg Case Rep. 2019 Feb 19;2019(2):rjz043
pubmed: 30800276
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Jul;38(5):598-606
pubmed: 29620475
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1981 Nov;137(5):1063-5
pubmed: 6794339
BMJ Case Rep. 2013 Nov 22;2013:
pubmed: 24272982
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2012 Apr;94(3):e118-20
pubmed: 22507707
J Minim Access Surg. 2013 Apr;9(2):59-64
pubmed: 23741110
Urology. 1998 Jul;52(1):120-2
pubmed: 9671882