A Hybrid Method for 3D Reconstruction of MR Images.
3D reconstruction
MR imaging
Marching Cubes
implicit models
Journal
Journal of imaging
ISSN: 2313-433X
Titre abrégé: J Imaging
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101698819
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Apr 2022
07 Apr 2022
Historique:
received:
26
02
2022
revised:
21
03
2022
accepted:
31
03
2022
entrez:
21
4
2022
pubmed:
22
4
2022
medline:
22
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Three-dimensional surface reconstruction is a well-known task in medical imaging. In procedures for intervention or radiation treatment planning, the generated models should be accurate and reflect the natural appearance. Traditional methods for this task, such as Marching Cubes, use smoothing post processing to reduce staircase artifacts from mesh generation and exhibit the natural look. However, smoothing algorithms often reduce the quality and degrade the accuracy. Other methods, such as MPU implicits, based on adaptive implicit functions, inherently produce smooth 3D models. However, the integration in the implicit functions of both smoothness and accuracy of the shape approximation may impact the precision of the reconstruction. Having these limitations in mind, we propose a hybrid method for 3D reconstruction of MR images. This method is based on a parallel Marching Cubes algorithm called Flying Edges (FE) and Multi-level Partition of Unity (MPU) implicits. We aim to combine the robustness of the Marching Cubes algorithm with the smooth implicit curve tracking enabled by the use of implicit models in order to provide higher geometry precision. Towards this end, the regions that closely fit to the segmentation data, and thus regions that are not impacted by reconstruction issues, are first extracted from both methods. These regions are then merged and used to reconstruct the final model. Experimental studies were performed on a number of MRI datasets, providing images and error statistics generated from our results. The results obtained show that our method reduces the geometric errors of the reconstructed surfaces when compared to the MPU and FE approaches, producing a more accurate 3D reconstruction.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35448230
pii: jimaging8040103
doi: 10.3390/jimaging8040103
pmc: PMC9029689
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
JAMA Neurol. 2013 Jul;70(7):903-11
pubmed: 23712469
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001 Jan;20(1):45-57
pubmed: 11293691
Graph Models. 2007 Mar;69(2):139-157
pubmed: 18496609
Hum Brain Mapp. 2002 Nov;17(3):143-55
pubmed: 12391568
Neuroimage. 1999 Feb;9(2):179-94
pubmed: 9931268
Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 15;62(2):774-81
pubmed: 22248573