Major adverse limb events in patients with femoro-popliteal and below-the-knee peripheral arterial disease treated with either sirolimus-coated balloon or standard uncoated balloon angioplasty: a structured protocol summary of the "SirPAD" randomized controlled trial.


Journal

Trials
ISSN: 1745-6215
Titre abrégé: Trials
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101263253

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 Apr 2022
Historique:
received: 08 03 2021
accepted: 28 03 2022
entrez: 22 4 2022
pubmed: 23 4 2022
medline: 26 4 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Peripheral arterial disease is a progressive atherosclerotic disease with symptoms ranging from an intermittent claudication to acute critical limb ischemia and amputations. Drug-coated balloons and stents were developed to prevent neo-intimal proliferation and restenosis after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Randomized controlled trials showed that drug-coated, notably paclitaxel-coated, devices reduce restenosis, late lumen loss, and the need for target lesion re-vascularization compared with uncoated ones. However, the size of these trials was too small to prove superiority for "hard" clinical outcomes. Moreover, available studies were characterized by too restrictive eligibility criteria. Finally, it remains unclear whether paclitaxel-coated balloons may impair long-term survival. Alternative drug-coated balloons, the so-called limus-based analogs, have been approved for clinical use in patients with peripheral arterial disease. By encapsulating sirolimus in phospholipid drug nanocarriers, they optimize adhesion properties of sirolimus and provide better bioavailability. In this investigator-initiated all-comer open-label phase III randomized controlled trial, we will evaluate whether sirolimus-coated balloon angioplasty is non-inferior and eventually superior, according to a predefined hierarchical analysis, to uncoated balloon angioplasty in adults with infra-inguinal peripheral arterial disease requiring endovascular angioplasty. Key exclusion criteria are pregnancy or breastfeeding, known intolerance or allergy to sirolimus, and participation in a clinical trial during the previous 3 months. The primary efficacy outcome is the composite of two clinically relevant non-subjective "hard" outcomes: unplanned major amputation of the target limb and endovascular or surgical target lesion re-vascularization for critical limb ischemia occurring within 1 year of randomization. The primary safety outcome includes death from all causes. By focusing on clinically relevant outcomes, this study will provide useful information on the efficacy and safety of sirolimus-coated balloon catheters for infra-inguinal peripheral arterial disease in a representative ("all-comer") population of unselected patients. As regulatory agencies had raised safety concerns in patients exposed to paclitaxel-coated devices (versus uncoated ones), collect mortality data up to 5 years after randomization will be collected. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04238546.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Peripheral arterial disease is a progressive atherosclerotic disease with symptoms ranging from an intermittent claudication to acute critical limb ischemia and amputations. Drug-coated balloons and stents were developed to prevent neo-intimal proliferation and restenosis after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Randomized controlled trials showed that drug-coated, notably paclitaxel-coated, devices reduce restenosis, late lumen loss, and the need for target lesion re-vascularization compared with uncoated ones. However, the size of these trials was too small to prove superiority for "hard" clinical outcomes. Moreover, available studies were characterized by too restrictive eligibility criteria. Finally, it remains unclear whether paclitaxel-coated balloons may impair long-term survival. Alternative drug-coated balloons, the so-called limus-based analogs, have been approved for clinical use in patients with peripheral arterial disease. By encapsulating sirolimus in phospholipid drug nanocarriers, they optimize adhesion properties of sirolimus and provide better bioavailability.
METHODS METHODS
In this investigator-initiated all-comer open-label phase III randomized controlled trial, we will evaluate whether sirolimus-coated balloon angioplasty is non-inferior and eventually superior, according to a predefined hierarchical analysis, to uncoated balloon angioplasty in adults with infra-inguinal peripheral arterial disease requiring endovascular angioplasty. Key exclusion criteria are pregnancy or breastfeeding, known intolerance or allergy to sirolimus, and participation in a clinical trial during the previous 3 months. The primary efficacy outcome is the composite of two clinically relevant non-subjective "hard" outcomes: unplanned major amputation of the target limb and endovascular or surgical target lesion re-vascularization for critical limb ischemia occurring within 1 year of randomization. The primary safety outcome includes death from all causes.
DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS
By focusing on clinically relevant outcomes, this study will provide useful information on the efficacy and safety of sirolimus-coated balloon catheters for infra-inguinal peripheral arterial disease in a representative ("all-comer") population of unselected patients. As regulatory agencies had raised safety concerns in patients exposed to paclitaxel-coated devices (versus uncoated ones), collect mortality data up to 5 years after randomization will be collected.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04238546.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35449070
doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06242-8
pii: 10.1186/s13063-022-06242-8
pmc: PMC9027348
doi:

Substances chimiques

Coated Materials, Biocompatible 0
Paclitaxel P88XT4IS4D
Sirolimus W36ZG6FT64

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04238546']

Types de publication

Clinical Trial Protocol Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

334

Subventions

Organisme : Concept Medical
ID : UZ-21-760

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Aug 28;72(9):999-1011
pubmed: 30139446
EClinicalMedicine. 2019 Oct 17;16:42-50
pubmed: 31832619
Eur Heart J. 2011 Nov;32(22):2851-906
pubmed: 21873417
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Aug;7(8):e1020-e1030
pubmed: 31303293
Ann Vasc Surg. 2018 Nov;53:171-176
pubmed: 29886205
N Engl J Med. 1998 Apr 16;338(16):1105-11
pubmed: 9545358
Stat Med. 2003 Jan 30;22(2):169-86
pubmed: 12520555
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Dec;62(6):1642-51.e3
pubmed: 26391460
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Apr;59(4):988-95
pubmed: 24360240
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Oct 1;4(5):495-504
pubmed: 21953370
Eur Heart J. 2011 Sep;32(18):2274-81
pubmed: 21622669
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan;7(1):10-9
pubmed: 24456716
J Endovasc Ther. 2016 Oct;23(5):701-7
pubmed: 27193308
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 May 22;71(20):2306-2315
pubmed: 29540326
Circulation. 2018 Jan 23;137(4):338-350
pubmed: 29133605
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017 Jun;53(6):853-861
pubmed: 28291676
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Dec 18;7(24):e011245
pubmed: 30561254
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 9;373(2):145-53
pubmed: 26106946
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Oct;66(4):1109-1116.e1
pubmed: 28655549
Circulation. 2015 Feb 3;131(5):495-502
pubmed: 25472980
Lancet. 2018 Jan 20;391(10117):219-229
pubmed: 29132880
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Oct 14;64(15):1568-76
pubmed: 25301459
JAMA. 2017 Dec 19;318(23):2337-2343
pubmed: 29260229
J Endovasc Ther. 2014 Apr;21(2):202-12
pubmed: 24754279
EuroIntervention. 2013 May 20;9(1):148-56
pubmed: 23685303
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Dec;68(6):1817-1823
pubmed: 30470369

Auteurs

Stefano Barco (S)

Department of Angiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. stefano.barco@usz.ch.

Tim Sebastian (T)

Department of Angiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Davide Voci (D)

Department of Angiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Rolf Peter Engelberger (RP)

HFR Fribourg Cantonal Hospital: HFR Fribourg Hopital cantonal, Fribourg, Switzerland.

Alexandru Grigorean (A)

Department of Angiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Erik Holy (E)

Department of Angiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Claudia Leeger (C)

Department of Angiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Mario Münger (M)

Department of Angiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Daniel Périard (D)

HFR Fribourg Cantonal Hospital: HFR Fribourg Hopital cantonal, Fribourg, Switzerland.

Eliane Probst (E)

Department of Angiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Rebecca Spescha (R)

Department of Angiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Ulrike Held (U)

Department of Biostatistics at Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Nils Kucher (N)

Department of Angiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH