Retrograde Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: Predictors of Procedural Success From the ERCTO Registry.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to identify independent predictors of procedural success after retrograde chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

BACKGROUND

Retrograde CTO PCI is an established technique, but predictors of success remain poorly understood.

METHODS

A multivariable logistic regression model was used to analyze potentially important demographic, clinical, anatomical, and technical aspects of retrograde CTO PCI cases uploaded to the multicenter European CTO (ERCTO) Club Registry.

RESULTS

In calendar years 2018 and 2019, 2,364 retrograde CTO PCI cases constituted the primary analysis cohort. A primary retrograde strategy was used in 1,953 cases (82.6%), and an initial antegrade approach was converted to retrograde in 411 cases (17.4%). Procedural success was achieved in 1,820 cases (77.0%) and was more likely to occur after a primary retrograde attempt versus conversion from an initial antegrade approach (80.9% vs 58.4%; P < 0.0001). After multivariable analysis, an absence of lesion calcification (OR: 1.86; 95% CI: 1.37-2.51; P < 0.0001), a higher degree of distal vessel opacification (OR: 2.47; 95% CI: 1.72-3.55; P < 0.0001), little or no proximal target vessel tortuosity (OR: 1.84; 95% CI: 1.28-2.64; P = 0.001), Werner collateral connection CC1 (OR: 4.87; 95% CI: 2.90-8.19; P < 0.0001) or CC2 (OR: 5.33; 95% CI: 3.02-9.42; P < 0.0001), and the top tertile of operator volume (>120 cases over 2 years) (OR: 1.88; 95% CI: 1.26-2.79; P = 0.002) were associated with the greatest chance of achieving angiographic success.

CONCLUSIONS

Less calcification with good distal vessel opacification, little or absent proximal vessel tortuosity, and visible collateral connections, along with high-volume operator status, were all independently predictive of angiographically successful retrograde CTO PCI.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Mashayekhi has received consulting, speaker, and proctoring honoraria from Abbott Vascular, Asahi Intecc, AstraZeneca, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cardinal Health, Daiichi-Sankyo, Medtronic, Teleflex, and Terumo. Dr Avran has received consulting, speaker, and proctoring honoraria from Asahi Intecc, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Terumo, Alvimedica, and OrbusNeich. Dr Boudou is a proctor and consultant for Asahi Intecc, Terumo, and Boston Scientific. Dr Garbo is a proctor and consultant for Philips Volcano, Boston Europe, Terumo Italy, and Europe Teleflex. Dr Bryniarski has received speaker and proctoring honoraria from Procardia Medical, Boston Scientific, and Terumo. Prof Spratt has received consulting, speaker, and proctoring honoraria from Abbott Vascular, Asahi Intecc, Boston Scientific, Cardinal Health, and Shockwave Medical. Dr Lesiak has received speaker and proctoring honoraria from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Medtronic, and Terumo Medical. Prof Di Mario has received research or educational grants from Abbott, Amgen, Asahi Intecc, AstraZeneca, Boston Scientific, Cardinal Health, Behring, Chiesi, Daiichi-Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Menarini, Pfizer, Sanofi, Shockwave, Teleflex, and Volcano-Philips. Dr Hildick-Smith has served on the advisory boards for Abbott, Terumo, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.