A Heart Team Approach to Assessing Frailty in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory.
Frailty
Heart team
Percutaneous coronary intervention
Journal
Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions
ISSN: 1878-0938
Titre abrégé: Cardiovasc Revasc Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101238551
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2022
10 2022
Historique:
received:
04
01
2022
revised:
02
04
2022
accepted:
05
04
2022
pubmed:
23
4
2022
medline:
28
9
2022
entrez:
22
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Frailty is a well-documented risk factor for increased morbidity and mortality among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). There remains a lack of knowledge regarding the impact of patient frailty in cardiac patient management and outcomes. Thus, this study examined whether the Heart Team, without using frailty assessments, made decisions regarding coronary interventions [medical management (MM) vs. PCI vs. coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)] that aligned with formally quantified frailty status. This cross-sectional quality-improvement (QI) study was performed at a single, large, urban Veterans Affairs Hospital. From September 2019 to November 2020, heart team nurses approached patients prior to coronary angiograms and assessed for frailty using the Risk Analysis Index Questionnaire (RAIC). Interventional cardiologists were blinded to the results. This study's independent variable was RAI-C score. The outcome variables were "intervention performed" (MM, PCI, or CABG) and presence of a "reduced invasiveness intervention" (RI). Ninety-five of the 182 participants had obstructive coronary artery disease. Among them, there were 69 PCIs, 10 CABGs, and 16 MMs. 26 received RIs. The primary outcomes demonstrated that frailty score was positively associated with receiving RI [adjusted OR = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.02-1.24, p = 0.02] and MM [adjusted OR = 1.13, CI = 1.02-1.25, p = 0.02], and negatively associated with receiving PCI [adjusted OR = 0.94, CI = 0.88-0.998, p = 0.04]. There was no significant association between frailty and the likelihood of undergoing CABG [AOR = 0.95, CI = 0.81-1.10, p = 0.47]. This study demonstrated that the Heart Team and patients at baseline reduced high-risk interventions in frailer patients. A Heart Team, shared-decision-making model utilizing the RAI-C was found to be efficient and effective at measuring frailty in coronary angiogram patients and should be considered for use in the clinical setting.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35450810
pii: S1553-8389(22)00174-9
doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2022.04.001
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
38-42Informations de copyright
Published by Elsevier Inc.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest MV-Research grant, Boston Scientific. Royalty payments, Merit Medical. RB, LS, JT, TS - None.