A randomized, controlled, first-in-patient trial of choriogonadotropin beta added to follitropin delta in women undergoing ovarian stimulation in a long GnRH agonist protocol.
Animals
Anti-Mullerian Hormone
Body Weight
CHO Cells
Chorionic Gonadotropin
Chorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, Human
Cricetinae
Cricetulus
Female
Fertilization in Vitro
/ methods
Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Human
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone
Humans
Ovulation Induction
/ methods
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Rate
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Recombinant Proteins
FE 999302
blastocyst quality
choriogonadotropin beta
combined ovarian stimulation
long GnRH agonist protocol
recombinant hCG
Journal
Human reproduction (Oxford, England)
ISSN: 1460-2350
Titre abrégé: Hum Reprod
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8701199
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 05 2022
30 05 2022
Historique:
received:
27
10
2021
revised:
03
03
2022
pubmed:
23
4
2022
medline:
3
6
2022
entrez:
22
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Does addition of choriogonadotropin beta (recombinant CG beta) to follitropin delta increase the number of good-quality blastocysts following ovarian stimulation in a long GnRH agonist protocol? At the doses investigated, the addition of CG beta reduced the number of intermediate follicles and related down-stream parameters including the number of oocytes and blastocysts. CG beta is a novel recombinant hCG (rhCG) molecule expressed by a human cell line (PER.C6®) and has a different glycosylation profile compared to urinary hCG or rhCG derived from a Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cell line. In the first-in-human trial, the CG beta pharmacokinetics were similar between men and women. In women, the AUC and the peak serum concentration (Cmax) increased approximately dose proportionally following single and multiple daily doses. In men, a single dose of CG beta provided higher exposure with a longer half-life and proportionately higher testosterone production than CHO cell-derived rhCG. This placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trial (RAINBOW) was conducted in five European countries to explore the efficacy and safety of CG beta as add-on treatment to follitropin delta in women undergoing ovarian stimulation in a long GnRH agonist protocol. Randomization was stratified by centre and age (30-37 and 38-42 years). The primary endpoint was the number of good-quality blastocysts (Grade 3 BB or higher). Subjects were randomized to receive either placebo or 1, 2, 4, 8 or 12 µg CG beta added to the daily individualized follitropin delta dose during ovarian stimulation. In total, 620 women (30-42 years) with anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels between 5 and 35 pmol/l were randomized in equal proportions to the six treatment groups and 619 subjects started treatment. All 619 subjects were treated with an individualized dose of follitropin delta determined based on AMH (Elecsys AMH Plus Immunoassay) and body weight. Triggering with rhCG was performed when 3 follicles were ≥17 mm but no more than 25 follicles ≥12 mm were reached. The demographic characteristics were comparable between the six treatment groups and the overall mean age, body weight and AMH were 35.6 ± 3.3 years, 65.3 ± 10.7 kg and 15.3 ± 7.0 pmol/l, respectively. The incidence of cycle cancellation (range 0-2.9%), total follitropin delta dose (mean 112 µg) and duration of stimulation (mean 10 days) were similar across the groups. At stimulation Day 6, the number and size of follicles was similar between the treatment groups, whereas at the end-of-stimulation dose-related decrease of the intermediate follicles between 12 and 17 mm was observed in comparison to the placebo group. In contrast, the number of follicles ≥17 mm was similar between the CG beta dose groups and the placebo group. A reduced number of intermediate follicles (12 to 17 mm) and fewer oocytes (mean range 9.7 to 11.2) were observed for all doses of CG beta compared to the follitropin delta only group (mean 12.5). The mean number of good-quality blastocysts was 3.3 in the follitropin delta group and ranged between 2.1 and 3.0 across the CG beta groups. The incidence of transfer cancellation was higher in the 4, 8 and 12 µg group, mostly as no blastocyst was available for transfer. In the group receiving only follitropin delta, the ongoing pregnancy rate (10-11 weeks after transfer) was 43% per started cycle versus 28-39% in CG beta groups and 49% per transfer versus 38-50% in the CG beta groups. There was no apparent effect of CG beta on the incidence of adverse events, which was 48.1% in the placebo group and 39.6-52.3% in the CG beta dose groups. In line with the number of collected oocytes, the overall ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome incidence remained lower following follitropin delta with CG beta (2.0-10.3%) compared with follitropin delta only treatment (11.5%). Regardless of the dose, CG beta was safe and well-tolerated with low risk of immunogenicity. The effect of the unique glycosylation of CG beta and its associated potency implications in women were not known prior to this trial. Further studies will be needed to evaluate optimal doses of CG beta for this and/or different indications. The high ongoing pregnancy rate in the follitropin delta group supports the use of individualized follitropin delta dosing in a long GnRH agonist protocol. The addition of CG beta reduced the presence of intermediate follicles with the investigated doses and negatively affected all down-stream parameters. Further clinical research will be needed to assess the optimal dose of CG beta in the optimal ratio to follitropin delta to develop this novel combination product containing both FSH and LH activity for ovarian stimulation. The study was funded by Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Copenhagen, Denmark. B.M. and P.L. are employees of Ferring Pharmaceuticals. M.F.S., H.V., C.Y.A., M.F., C.B., A.P. and Y.K. have received institutional clinical trial fees from Ferring Pharmaceuticals. C.B. has received payments for lectures from Organon, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Merck A/S and Abbott. M.F.S. has received payment for lectures from Ferring Pharmaceuticals. Y.K. has received payment for lectures from Merck and travel support from Gedeon Richter. H.V. has received consulting fees from Oxo and Obseva and travel support from Gedeon Richter, Ferring Pharmaceuticals and Merck. C.Y.A. has received payment for lectures from IBSA, Switzerland. M.F and C.Y.A. were reimbursed as members of the Data Monitoring Board in this trial. M.F. has an issued patent about unitary combination of FSH and hCG (EP1633389). 2017-003810-13 (EudraCT Number). 21 May 2018. 13 June 2018.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35451013
pii: 6572208
doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac061
pmc: PMC9156848
doi:
Substances chimiques
Chorionic Gonadotropin
0
Chorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, Human
0
Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Human
0
Pharmaceutical Preparations
0
Recombinant Proteins
0
follitropin delta
076WHW89TW
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone
33515-09-2
Anti-Mullerian Hormone
80497-65-0
Types de publication
Clinical Trial Protocol
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1161-1174Investigateurs
Christophe Blockeel
(C)
Petra de Sutter
(P)
Hana Višnová
(H)
Petr Uher
(P)
Milan Mrazek Gynem
(MM)
Ales Sobek
(A)
Milan Kafka
(M)
Nina La Cour Freiesleben
(NC)
Anja Pinborg
(A)
Merete Husth
(M)
Ursula Bentin-Ley
(U)
Manuel Fernández Sánchez
(MF)
Marcos Ferrando
(M)
Juan Antonio Garcia Velasco
(JAG)
Ernesto Bosch
(E)
Victoria Verdu
(V)
Pedro Barri
(P)
Scott Nelson
(S)
Nitish Narvekar
(N)
Andrew Drakeley
(A)
Yacoub Khalaf
(Y)
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.
Références
Biol Reprod. 1994 Jul;51(1):72-81
pubmed: 7918877
Hum Reprod. 2012 Oct;27(10):3074-84
pubmed: 22791754
Hum Reprod. 2007 Sep;22(9):2404-13
pubmed: 17640944
Hum Reprod. 2000 Jul;15(7):1490-8
pubmed: 10875855
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2013 Nov;79(5):708-15
pubmed: 23448396
Fertil Steril. 1998 Dec;70(6):1114-25
pubmed: 9848304
Reprod Biomed Online. 2019 Apr;38(4):528-537
pubmed: 30713022
Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2012 Jun 5;356(1-2):88-97
pubmed: 22342845
Hum Reprod. 2003 Feb;18(2):314-22
pubmed: 12571167
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001 Jan;86(1):337-43
pubmed: 11232021
Endocr Connect. 2017 Jul;6(5):297-305
pubmed: 28450423
Hum Reprod. 2006 Dec;21(12):3217-27
pubmed: 16873892
Fertil Steril. 2005 Aug;84(2):394-401
pubmed: 16084880
Reprod Med Biol. 2017 Oct 16;17(1):52-58
pubmed: 29371821
Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 Jun;11(2):249-60
pubmed: 9536210
Endocr Rev. 2018 Oct 1;39(5):549-592
pubmed: 29905829
Hum Reprod. 2005 Mar;20(3):629-35
pubmed: 15618252
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018 Aug 10;9:452
pubmed: 30147675
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2013 Jan;29(1):46-50
pubmed: 22809021
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2008 Dec 15;48(5):1267-81
pubmed: 18993008
J Biol Chem. 1976 Dec 10;251(23):7729-31
pubmed: 187595
Biol Reprod. 2004 Apr;70(4):861-6
pubmed: 14668203
Endocr Rev. 2000 Apr;21(2):200-14
pubmed: 10782364
J Assist Reprod Genet. 1999 Sep;16(8):425-30
pubmed: 10478322
Hum Reprod. 2011 Jun;26(6):1270-83
pubmed: 21502182
Fertil Steril. 2017 Feb;107(2):387-396.e4
pubmed: 27912901
Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Jul;14(4):1590-1599
pubmed: 33982429
Endocr Rev. 2002 Apr;23(2):141-74
pubmed: 11943741
Annu Rev Biochem. 1981;50:465-95
pubmed: 6267989
Reprod Biomed Online. 2002 Mar-Apr;4(2):106-15
pubmed: 12470572
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002 Mar;87(3):1156-61
pubmed: 11889180
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1989 Jun;44(6):430-40
pubmed: 2660037
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2009 Jan 26;7:8
pubmed: 19171054
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Aug;97(8):E1524-31
pubmed: 22659248
Reprod Biomed Online. 2007 May;14(5):640-9
pubmed: 17509210
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010 Aug 24;8:102
pubmed: 20735820