Barriers to Clinical Trial Participation: Comparative Study Between Rural and Urban Participants.
cancer
cancer patients
clinical trials
electronic screening
electronic screening logs
health policy epidemiology
lung cancer
patients
rural residents
screening
Journal
JMIR cancer
ISSN: 2369-1999
Titre abrégé: JMIR Cancer
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101666844
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Apr 2022
21 Apr 2022
Historique:
received:
29
08
2021
accepted:
26
03
2022
revised:
21
11
2021
entrez:
22
4
2022
pubmed:
23
4
2022
medline:
23
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The National Clinical Trials Network program conducts phase 2 or phase 3 treatment trials across all National Cancer Institute's designated cancer centers. Participant accrual across these clinical trials is a critical factor in deciding their success. Cancer centers that cater to rural populations, such as The University of Kansas Cancer Center, have an additional responsibility to ensure rural residents have access and are well represented across these studies. There are scant data available regarding the factors that act as barriers to the accrual of rural residents in these clinical trials. This study aims to use electronic screening logs that were used to gather patient data at several participating sites in The Kansas University of Cancer Center's Catchment area. Screening log data were used to assess what clinical trial participation barriers are faced by these patients. Additionally, the differences in clinical trial participation barriers were compared between rural and urban participating sites. Analysis revealed that the hospital location rural urban category, defined as whether the hospital was in an urban or rural setting, had a medium effect on enrolment of patients in breast cancer and lung cancer trials (Cohen d=0.7). Additionally, the hospital location category had a medium effect on the proportion of recurrent lung cancer cases at the time of screening (d=0.6). In consideration of the financially hostile nature of cancer treatment as well as geographical and transportation barriers, clinical trials extended to rural communities are uniquely positioned to alleviate the burden of nonmedical costs in trial participation. However, these options can be far less feasible for patients in rural settings. Since the number of patients with cancer who are eligible for a clinical trial is already limited by the stringent eligibility criteria required of such a complex disease, improving accessibility for rural patients should be a greater focus in health policy.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The National Clinical Trials Network program conducts phase 2 or phase 3 treatment trials across all National Cancer Institute's designated cancer centers. Participant accrual across these clinical trials is a critical factor in deciding their success. Cancer centers that cater to rural populations, such as The University of Kansas Cancer Center, have an additional responsibility to ensure rural residents have access and are well represented across these studies.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
There are scant data available regarding the factors that act as barriers to the accrual of rural residents in these clinical trials. This study aims to use electronic screening logs that were used to gather patient data at several participating sites in The Kansas University of Cancer Center's Catchment area.
METHODS
METHODS
Screening log data were used to assess what clinical trial participation barriers are faced by these patients. Additionally, the differences in clinical trial participation barriers were compared between rural and urban participating sites.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Analysis revealed that the hospital location rural urban category, defined as whether the hospital was in an urban or rural setting, had a medium effect on enrolment of patients in breast cancer and lung cancer trials (Cohen d=0.7). Additionally, the hospital location category had a medium effect on the proportion of recurrent lung cancer cases at the time of screening (d=0.6).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
In consideration of the financially hostile nature of cancer treatment as well as geographical and transportation barriers, clinical trials extended to rural communities are uniquely positioned to alleviate the burden of nonmedical costs in trial participation. However, these options can be far less feasible for patients in rural settings. Since the number of patients with cancer who are eligible for a clinical trial is already limited by the stringent eligibility criteria required of such a complex disease, improving accessibility for rural patients should be a greater focus in health policy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35451964
pii: v8i2e33240
doi: 10.2196/33240
pmc: PMC9073606
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e33240Subventions
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : P20 GM130423
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA168524
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
©Dinesh Pal Mudaranthakam, Byron Gajewski, Hope Krebill, James Coulter, Michelle Springer, Elizabeth Calhoun, Dorothy Hughes, Matthew Mayo, Gary Doolittle. Originally published in JMIR Cancer (https://cancer.jmir.org), 21.04.2022.
Références
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2019 Jan;39:105-114
pubmed: 31099636
Oncology (Williston Park). 2015 Sep;29(9):633-40
pubmed: 26384798
J Oncol Pract. 2011 May;7(3):172-7
pubmed: 21886499
Health Serv Res. 2007 Apr;42(2):644-62
pubmed: 17362211
Med J Malaysia. 2005 Mar;60(1):118-24; quiz 125
pubmed: 16250298
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Oct;31(10):1222-36
pubmed: 27220499
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208
pubmed: 31078660
Cancer Inform. 2022 Jan 25;21:11769351211073114
pubmed: 35095270
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2012 May;21(3):321-9
pubmed: 22111696
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Nov 20;35(33):3745-3752
pubmed: 28968168
Toxics. 2016 Jan 08;4(1):
pubmed: 29051407
J Clin Oncol. 1996 Apr;14(4):1364-70
pubmed: 8648395
Am Surg. 2019 Jul 1;85(7):752-756
pubmed: 31405422
J Rural Health. 2014 Winter;30(1):79-88
pubmed: 24383487
Oncologist. 2013;18(4):381-90
pubmed: 23442307
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Dec;38(12):2003-2010
pubmed: 31794316
Support Care Cancer. 2019 Oct;27(10):3793-3798
pubmed: 30721369
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Sep 1;33(25):2815-20
pubmed: 26195710
J Grad Med Educ. 2012 Sep;4(3):279-82
pubmed: 23997866
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 May;151(1):27-40
pubmed: 25893588