Integrative diagnosis of primary cutaneous large B-cell lymphomas supports the relevance of cell of origin profiling.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
07
02
2022
accepted:
31
03
2022
entrez:
22
4
2022
pubmed:
23
4
2022
medline:
27
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Primary cutaneous large B-cell lymphomas (PCLBCL) represent a diagnostic challenge because they are classified as PCLBCL, leg type (PCLBCL, LT) or primary cutaneous follicle centre lymphoma, large cell (PCFCL, LC), which differ by prognosis and therapeutic requirement. Unclassified cases with discordant clinical presentations, morphologies, and immunophenotypes may be classified into the not otherwise specified (PCLBCL, NOS) category based on ancillary molecular analyses. Cell-of-origin profiling as germinal centre (GC) type or non-GC type by immunohistochemistry is not considered reproducible because of variable CD10 expression. In a series of 55 PCLBCL cases with > 80% large cells, we reported 21 PCFCL, LC cases as GC-type and 27 PCLBCL, LT as non-GC-type; 7 cases were considered PCLBCL, NOS. Here, we demonstrate the accuracy of molecular profiling of PCLBCL as GC or non-GC type using a reverse transcriptase multiplex ligation assay (RT-MLPA). RT-MLPA classified the seven PCLBCL, NOS cases in accordance with their mutational profile. An integrative principal component analysis confirmed the main criteria and the relevance of genomic profiling of PCFCL, LC as GC-derived, and PCLBCL, LT as non-GC-derived. Both the cell-of-origin classification of PCLBCL and the integrative analysis identified two clinically relevant subgroups according to overall survival, which may help to standardize PCLBCL diagnosis and patient management.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35452489
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266978
pii: PONE-D-22-02072
pmc: PMC9032422
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0266978Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Nat Med. 2018 May;24(5):679-690
pubmed: 29713087
Am J Surg Pathol. 2018 Nov;42(11):1488-1494
pubmed: 30113335
JAMA Dermatol. 2014 May;150(5):535-41
pubmed: 24647650
Virchows Arch. 2022 Mar;480(3):667-675
pubmed: 35028710
Nucleic Acids Res. 2010 Sep;38(16):e164
pubmed: 20601685
Histopathology. 2019 Jun;74(7):1067-1080
pubmed: 30715765
Blood. 2018 May 3;131(18):2060-2064
pubmed: 29475959
Blood. 2008 Sep 1;112(5):1600-9
pubmed: 18567836
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Jun 15;22(12):2919-28
pubmed: 26819451
Ann Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;29(Suppl 4):iv30-iv40
pubmed: 29878045
Am J Surg Pathol. 2019 Oct;43(10):1403-1412
pubmed: 31464711
N Engl J Med. 2002 Jun 20;346(25):1937-47
pubmed: 12075054
J Invest Dermatol. 2019 Nov;139(11):2334-2342.e8
pubmed: 31150604
Nature. 2011 Jul 27;476(7360):298-303
pubmed: 21796119
Blood. 2013 Apr 4;121(14):2715-24
pubmed: 23343832
Blood Cancer J. 2020 May 22;10(5):59
pubmed: 32444689
N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 12;378(15):1396-1407
pubmed: 29641966
Blood. 2019 Apr 18;133(16):1703-1714
pubmed: 30635287
J Mol Diagn. 2017 Nov;19(6):892-904
pubmed: 29054399
J Invest Dermatol. 2017 Sep;137(9):1984-1994
pubmed: 28479318
Am J Hematol. 2020 Aug 20;:
pubmed: 32815650
Blood. 2005 May 15;105(10):3768-85
pubmed: 15692063
Blood Adv. 2020 Jul 28;4(14):3391-3404
pubmed: 32722783
Blood. 2016 May 19;127(20):2375-90
pubmed: 26980727
Blood Adv. 2021 Feb 9;5(3):649-661
pubmed: 33560380
Blood. 2005 May 1;105(9):3671-8
pubmed: 15308563
Hum Pathol. 2020 Dec;106:93-105
pubmed: 33045225
J Invest Dermatol. 2018 Nov;138(11):2365-2376
pubmed: 29857068