A third dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine significantly improves immune responses among liver transplant recipients.
BNT162b2 mRNA
antibody response
immune response
liver transplant recipients
side effects BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine
third dose
Journal
Journal of hepatology
ISSN: 1600-0641
Titre abrégé: J Hepatol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8503886
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2022
09 2022
Historique:
received:
04
10
2021
revised:
12
03
2022
accepted:
31
03
2022
pubmed:
23
4
2022
medline:
23
8
2022
entrez:
22
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Immune responses of solid organ transplant recipients to 2 doses of the BNT162b2 mRNA anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine are impaired. The immunogenicity and safety of a third dose among liver transplant (LT) recipients are unknown. This work aimed to evaluate the immune response of LT recipients to a third dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. Consecutive LT recipients (n = 61) in follow-up at Sheba Medical Center were included. Receptor binding domain (RBD) IgG, neutralizing antibody (NA) titers, and T-cell levels before and 21-28 days after a third vaccine dose were determined. Adverse effects after the third dose were monitored. The median age of LT recipients was 65 years and 57.4% were male. The humoral immune response rate improved significantly, with 56% of patients showing a response before the third vaccine dose compared to 98% after the third dose. The cellular response in 12 evaluated patients improved significantly (p = 0.008). The geometric mean of anti-RBD IgG levels, NA levels, and T-cell count also increased significantly after the third dose. NA titers after the third dose negatively correlated with age (p = 0.03), mycophenolate mofetil treatment (p = 0.005), and combined immunosuppression as opposed to calcineurin inhibitor monotherapy (p = 0.001). After the third dose, adverse effects were reported by 37% of recipients and were mostly mild (local pain and fatigue). After a third BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine, the immune response improved significantly among LT recipients, without serious adverse effects. Further studies are needed to evaluate immune response durability and to determine the optimal number and schedule of booster vaccine doses. The Pfizer-Biotech BNT162b2SARS-CoV-2 vaccine induced significant immunity among liver transplant recipients after a third dose. The majority of the patients developed sufficient levels of both humoral and cellular immune responses. Factors that predict non-response were older age and immunosuppressive medications.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND & AIMS
Immune responses of solid organ transplant recipients to 2 doses of the BNT162b2 mRNA anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine are impaired. The immunogenicity and safety of a third dose among liver transplant (LT) recipients are unknown. This work aimed to evaluate the immune response of LT recipients to a third dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine.
METHODS
Consecutive LT recipients (n = 61) in follow-up at Sheba Medical Center were included. Receptor binding domain (RBD) IgG, neutralizing antibody (NA) titers, and T-cell levels before and 21-28 days after a third vaccine dose were determined. Adverse effects after the third dose were monitored.
RESULTS
The median age of LT recipients was 65 years and 57.4% were male. The humoral immune response rate improved significantly, with 56% of patients showing a response before the third vaccine dose compared to 98% after the third dose. The cellular response in 12 evaluated patients improved significantly (p = 0.008). The geometric mean of anti-RBD IgG levels, NA levels, and T-cell count also increased significantly after the third dose. NA titers after the third dose negatively correlated with age (p = 0.03), mycophenolate mofetil treatment (p = 0.005), and combined immunosuppression as opposed to calcineurin inhibitor monotherapy (p = 0.001). After the third dose, adverse effects were reported by 37% of recipients and were mostly mild (local pain and fatigue).
CONCLUSION
After a third BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine, the immune response improved significantly among LT recipients, without serious adverse effects. Further studies are needed to evaluate immune response durability and to determine the optimal number and schedule of booster vaccine doses.
LAY SUMMARY
The Pfizer-Biotech BNT162b2SARS-CoV-2 vaccine induced significant immunity among liver transplant recipients after a third dose. The majority of the patients developed sufficient levels of both humoral and cellular immune responses. Factors that predict non-response were older age and immunosuppressive medications.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35452692
pii: S0168-8278(22)00237-9
doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.03.042
pmc: PMC9015954
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Viral
0
Immunoglobulin G
0
Vaccines, Synthetic
0
mRNA Vaccines
0
BNT162 Vaccine
N38TVC63NU
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
702-709Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interest The authors of this manuscript have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details.
Références
Kidney Int. 2021 Nov;100(5):1135-1136
pubmed: 34509489
Nat Med. 2021 Jul;27(7):1280-1289
pubmed: 34017137
JAMA. 2021 Jul 23;:
pubmed: 34297036
Immunity. 2021 Sep 14;54(9):2133-2142.e3
pubmed: 34453880
Hepatol Int. 2020 Dec;14(6):930-943
pubmed: 33099753
Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Oct;80(10):1345-1350
pubmed: 34285048
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 23;15(11):e0241164
pubmed: 33227020
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021 Nov;10:100208
pubmed: 34514454
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021 Dec 1;32(12):3027-3033
pubmed: 34667083
N Engl J Med. 2021 Oct 14;385(16):1474-1484
pubmed: 34320281
JAMA. 2021 May 4;325(17):1784-1786
pubmed: 33720292
J Hepatol. 2021 Aug;75(2):435-438
pubmed: 33892006
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Jan;20(1):162-172.e9
pubmed: 34509643
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Jul;21(7):939-949
pubmed: 33930320
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Jul 04;9(7):
pubmed: 34358154
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2021 Aug;40(8):759-762
pubmed: 34034958
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Dec;29:100651
pubmed: 33235985
Kidney Int Suppl (2011). 2013 Jan;3(1):19-62
pubmed: 25018975
N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 15;384(15):1412-1423
pubmed: 33626250
N Engl J Med. 2021 Aug 12;385(7):661-662
pubmed: 34161700
Liver Transpl. 2022 Feb;28(2):215-223
pubmed: 34767690
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2022 Feb;41(2):148-157
pubmed: 34565682
Viruses. 2021 Apr 25;13(5):
pubmed: 33923063
Am J Transplant. 2021 Aug;21(8):2719-2726
pubmed: 33866672
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 31;383(27):2603-2615
pubmed: 33301246
Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Sep;9(9):999-1009
pubmed: 34224675