Simultaneous multi-slice steady-state free precession myocardial perfusion with iterative reconstruction and integrated motion compensation.
Motion compensation
Myocardial perfusion
Simultaneous multi-slice
Journal
European journal of radiology
ISSN: 1872-7727
Titre abrégé: Eur J Radiol
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 8106411
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2022
Jun 2022
Historique:
received:
25
01
2022
revised:
09
03
2022
accepted:
23
03
2022
pubmed:
23
4
2022
medline:
18
5
2022
entrez:
22
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Simultaneous multi-slice (SMS) balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) acquisition and iterative reconstruction can provide high spatial resolution and coverage for cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) perfusion. However, respiratory motion remains a challenge for iterative reconstruction techniques employing temporal regularisation. The aim of this study is to evaluate an iterative reconstruction with integrated motion compensation for SMS-bSSFP first-pass myocardial stress perfusion in the presence of respiratory motion. Thirty-one patients with suspected coronary artery disease were prospectively recruited and imaged at 1.5 T. A SMS-bSSFP prototype myocardial perfusion sequence was acquired at stress in all patients. All datasets were reconstructed using an iterative reconstruction with temporal regularisation, once with and once without motion compensation (MC and NMC, respectively). Three readers scored each dataset in terms of: image quality (1:poor; 4:excellent), motion/blurring (1:severe motion/blurring; 3:no motion/blurring), and diagnostic confidence (1:poor confidence; 3:high confidence). Quantitative assessment of sharpness was performed. The number of uncorrupted first-pass dynamics was measured on the NMC datasets to classify patients into 'suboptimal breath-hold (BH)' and 'good BH' groups. Compared across all cases, MC performed better than NMC in terms of image quality (3.5 ± 0.5 vs. 3.0 ± 0.8, P = 0.002), motion/blurring (2.9 ± 0.1 vs. 2.2 ± 0.8, P < 0.001), diagnostic confidence (2.9 ± 0.1 vs. 2.3 ± 0.7, P < 0.001) and sharpness index (0.34 ± 0.05 vs. 0.31 ± 0.06, P < 0.001). Fourteen patients with a suboptimal BH were identified. For the suboptimal BH group, MC performed better than NMC in terms of image quality (3.8 ± 0.4 vs. 2.6 ± 0.8, P < 0.001), motion/blurring (3.0 ± 0.1 vs. 1.6 ± 0.7, P < 0.001), diagnostic confidence (3.0 ± 0.1 vs. 1.9 ± 0.7, P < 0.001) and sharpness index (0.34 ± 0.05 vs. 0.30 ± 0.06, P = 0.004). For the good BH group, sharpness index was higher for MC than NMC (0.34 ± 0.06 vs 0.31 ± 0.07, P = 0.03), while there were no significant differences observed for the other three metrics assessed (P > 0.11). There were no significant differences between suboptimal BH MC and good BH MC for any of the reported metrics (P > 0.06). Integrated motion compensation significantly reduces motion/blurring and improves image quality, diagnostic confidence and sharpness index of SMS-bSSFP perfusion with iterative reconstruction in the presence of motion.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35452953
pii: S0720-048X(22)00136-X
doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110286
pmc: PMC9941714
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
110286Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Références
Magn Reson Med. 2022 Aug;88(2):663-675
pubmed: 35344593
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2018 Dec 10;20(1):84
pubmed: 30526627
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2014 Nov 22;16:91
pubmed: 25416082
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017 Apr 7;19(1):43
pubmed: 28385161
Magn Reson Med. 2005 Jan;53(1):159-68
pubmed: 15690515
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001 Feb;13(2):313-7
pubmed: 11169840
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Jun;39(6):1575-87
pubmed: 24151153
Eur J Radiol. 2020 Oct;131:109213
pubmed: 32846332
Magn Reson Med. 2017 Jun;77(6):2320-2330
pubmed: 27364875
Magn Reson Med. 2019 Jan;81(1):129-139
pubmed: 30058197
Magn Reson Med. 2013 Aug;70(2):504-16
pubmed: 22899104
Magn Reson Med. 2005 Apr;53(4):981-5
pubmed: 15799044
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2009;12(Pt 2):741-9
pubmed: 20426178
Magn Reson Med. 2021 Aug;86(2):663-676
pubmed: 33749026
Magn Reson Med. 2014 Sep;72(3):689-98
pubmed: 24123153
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Mar;23(3):315-22
pubmed: 16463299
Magn Reson Med. 2012 Dec;68(6):1994-2004
pubmed: 22354744
Magn Reson Med. 2020 Dec;84(6):3103-3116
pubmed: 32530064
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Jan;7(1):14-22
pubmed: 24433707
Magn Reson Med. 2014 Oct;72(4):1028-38
pubmed: 24243528
Magn Reson Med. 2021 Aug;86(2):648-662
pubmed: 33709415
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013 Oct 08;15:91
pubmed: 24103764
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2015 Jan;34(1):72-85
pubmed: 25095251
Magn Reson Med. 2021 May;85(5):2661-2671
pubmed: 33270946
J Magn Reson Imaging. 1991 Jul-Aug;1(4):457-61
pubmed: 1790368
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Jul;7(4):647-54
pubmed: 24867884
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2018 Feb 01;20(1):6
pubmed: 29386056
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Jan 4;57(1):70-5
pubmed: 21185504
Magn Reson Med. 2017 Mar;77(3):1238-1248
pubmed: 27091812
Magn Reson Med. 2005 Mar;53(3):684-91
pubmed: 15723404
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Dec 18;60(24):e44-e164
pubmed: 23182125
Magn Reson Med. 2018 Dec;80(6):2641-2654
pubmed: 29672922
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1988 Nov-Dec;12(6):1026-30
pubmed: 3183105