The High Testosterone Concentrations of the Bucks Used in the "Male Effect" Is Not a Prerequisite for Obtaining High Ovarian Activity in Goats from Mediterranean Latitudes.
GnRH agonist
male effect
odor
photoperiod
scrotal circumference
testosterone
Journal
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Apr 2022
07 Apr 2022
Historique:
received:
13
02
2022
revised:
31
03
2022
accepted:
05
04
2022
entrez:
23
4
2022
pubmed:
24
4
2022
medline:
24
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Two experiments were carried out. Firstly, 54 anestrous females were placed in contact with photostimulated males (Photo; n = 27) or with no photostimulated males (Natural; n = 27). Moreover, a group of bucks treated with artificial photoperiod and a group of bucks subjected to natural photoperiod without contact with females was used (Photo Isolated and Natural Isolated, respectively). In the Natural groups, the testosterone concentrations were similar except for three days after the introduction of the bucks to the does (19.72 ± 4.11 vs. 2.05 ± 0.25 ng/mL for Natural and Natural isolated bucks, respectively, p < 0.05). However, no differences were observed in the Photo groups during the entire experiment. The percentage of females showing estrous was higher in the group of females in contact with photostimulated bucks (96 vs. 74%, respectively, p < 0.05). In the second experiment, a GnRH agonist, deslorelin, was used to regulate the testosterone concentrations of the bucks. Seventy anestrous females were divided into five groups depending on the treatment received by the bucks to which they were exposed: photostimulated bucks (Photo group, n = 14); photostimulated bucks but treated with the agonist at the onset of the photoperiod treatment (Photo-Ago Long group, n = 13); photostimulated bucks but treated with the agonist at the end of the photoperiod treatment (Photo-Ago Short group, n = 15); bucks receiving no photostimulation but treated with the agonist at the end of the photoperiod treatment period (Natural-Ago Short group, n = 13) and bucks receiving no photostimulation nor agonist (Natural group, n = 15). The agonist treatment increased testosterone concentrations after the injection, which remained high for the entire experiment (p < 0.05). Six days after the introduction of the bucks to the does, the testosterone concentrations increased only in the Natural group reaching similar concentrations to the other groups (12.17 ± 6.55, 16.69 ± 4.53, 8.70 ± 0.61, 11.03 ± 1.45 and 14.42 ± 3.64 ng/mL for Photo, Photo-Ago Long, Photo-Ago Short, Natural-Ago Short and Natural bucks, respectively, p > 0.05). No differences in reproductive parameters were observed (p > 0.05). These results demonstrate that, at Mediterranean latitudes, anestrous females can stimulate the testosterone concentrations of bucks after a period of isolation. The high testosterone concentrations are not a prerequisite for an adequate response to the male effect.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35454200
pii: ani12080954
doi: 10.3390/ani12080954
pmc: PMC9029418
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness
ID : AGL2016-75848-R
Références
Biol Reprod. 2000 May;62(5):1409-14
pubmed: 10775194
J Reprod Fertil. 1994 Mar;100(2):521-31
pubmed: 8021873
Anim Reprod Sci. 2018 Aug;195:230-241
pubmed: 29859702
J Reprod Fertil. 1994 Nov;102(2):351-60
pubmed: 7861388
Reprod Nutr Dev. 2004 May-Jun;44(3):183-93
pubmed: 15460158
J Reprod Fertil. 1986 Jul;77(2):587-97
pubmed: 3090246
Reprod Nutr Dev. 1991;31(1):97-102
pubmed: 2043264
Theriogenology. 2009 May;71(8):1316-25
pubmed: 19249088
Domest Anim Endocrinol. 2020 Apr;71:106395
pubmed: 31731252
Biol Reprod. 1993 Nov;49(5):1133-40
pubmed: 8286581
J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 1999;54:231-42
pubmed: 10692858
Reprod Fertil Dev. 2003;15(6):317-22
pubmed: 14975229
J Reprod Fertil. 1988 May;83(1):201-8
pubmed: 3397938
J Endocrinol. 2011 Dec;211(3):263-72
pubmed: 21903864
Anim Reprod Sci. 2016 May;168:86-91
pubmed: 27006331
Theriogenology. 2014 Dec;82(9):1310-5
pubmed: 25266331
Biol Reprod. 1979 Apr;20(3):633-8
pubmed: 378277
J Anim Sci. 2002 Nov;80(11):2780-6
pubmed: 12462243
Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2000 Apr 19;67(4):293-305
pubmed: 10760609
Theriogenology. 2012 Jul 1;78(1):182-8
pubmed: 22541323
Anim Reprod Sci. 2005 Aug;88(1-2):115-26
pubmed: 15955640
Biol Reprod. 2011 Mar;84(3):447-54
pubmed: 20980689
Horm Behav. 1983 Jun;17(2):169-82
pubmed: 6411581
Biol Reprod. 1980 Mar;22(2):269-76
pubmed: 6769512
Theriogenology. 2010 Sep 15;74(5):733-40
pubmed: 20570338
Anim Reprod Sci. 2019 Mar;202:58-64
pubmed: 30717994
Anim Reprod Sci. 2005 Aug;88(1-2):127-39
pubmed: 15970407
Anim Reprod Sci. 2011 Jun;126(1-2):83-90
pubmed: 21601383
Reprod Domest Anim. 2009 Oct;44(5):725-34
pubmed: 19769638
J Androl. 1985 Jan-Feb;6(1):53-60
pubmed: 3156111
Br Vet J. 1967 Dec;123(12):541-9
pubmed: 6076667
Animal. 2019 Aug;13(8):1658-1665
pubmed: 30621806
J Neuroendocrinol. 2010 Jul;22(7):825-32
pubmed: 20646176
Theriogenology. 2006 Oct;66(6-7):1507-12
pubmed: 16600356
Animal. 2007 Mar;1(3):419-32
pubmed: 22444340
J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol. 2008 Mar 1;309(3):117-26
pubmed: 18213611
Anim Reprod Sci. 2008 Jan 30;103(3-4):271-7
pubmed: 17208396
Animals (Basel). 2021 Feb 05;11(2):
pubmed: 33562447
Reprod Domest Anim. 2009 Apr;44(2):266-72
pubmed: 18694429
Theriogenology. 2014 Feb;81(3):509-13
pubmed: 24290373
J Androl. 1985 Mar-Apr;6(2):89-96
pubmed: 3921507