Healthcare Resource Utilization among Patients between 60-75 Years with Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia Receiving Intensive Chemotherapy Induction: A Spanish Retrospective Observational Study.
health care costs
hospitalization
reimbursement
secondary acute myeloid leukemia
Journal
Cancers
ISSN: 2072-6694
Titre abrégé: Cancers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101526829
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 Apr 2022
11 Apr 2022
Historique:
received:
11
03
2022
revised:
07
04
2022
accepted:
08
04
2022
entrez:
23
4
2022
pubmed:
24
4
2022
medline:
24
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Information regarding the impact on healthcare systems of secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) is scarce. A retrospective review of medical charts identified patients aged 60-75 years with sAML between 2010 and 2019. Patient information was collected from diagnosis to death or last follow-up. Outpatient resource use, reimbursement, frequency and duration of hospitalization, and transfusion burden were assessed. Forty-six patients with a median age of 64 years were included. Anthracycline plus cytarabine regimens were the most common induction treatment (39 patients, 85%). The ratio of the total days hospitalized between the total follow-up was 29%, with a sum of 204 hospitalizations (average four/patient; average duration 21 days). The total average reimbursement was EUR 90,008 per patient, with the majority (EUR 77,827) related to hospital admissions (EUR 17,403/hospitalization). Most hospitalizations (163, mean 22 days) occurred in the period before the first allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHSCT), costing EUR 59,698 per patient and EUR 15,857 per hospitalization. The period after alloHSCT (in only 10 patients) had 41 hospitalizations (mean 21 days), and a mean reimbursement cost of EUR 99,542 per patient and EUR 24,278 per hospitalization. In conclusion, there is a high consumption of economic and healthcare resources in elderly patients with sAML receiving active treatments in Spain.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Information regarding the impact on healthcare systems of secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) is scarce.
METHODS
METHODS
A retrospective review of medical charts identified patients aged 60-75 years with sAML between 2010 and 2019. Patient information was collected from diagnosis to death or last follow-up. Outpatient resource use, reimbursement, frequency and duration of hospitalization, and transfusion burden were assessed. Forty-six patients with a median age of 64 years were included. Anthracycline plus cytarabine regimens were the most common induction treatment (39 patients, 85%). The ratio of the total days hospitalized between the total follow-up was 29%, with a sum of 204 hospitalizations (average four/patient; average duration 21 days). The total average reimbursement was EUR 90,008 per patient, with the majority (EUR 77,827) related to hospital admissions (EUR 17,403/hospitalization). Most hospitalizations (163, mean 22 days) occurred in the period before the first allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHSCT), costing EUR 59,698 per patient and EUR 15,857 per hospitalization. The period after alloHSCT (in only 10 patients) had 41 hospitalizations (mean 21 days), and a mean reimbursement cost of EUR 99,542 per patient and EUR 24,278 per hospitalization. In conclusion, there is a high consumption of economic and healthcare resources in elderly patients with sAML receiving active treatments in Spain.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35454828
pii: cancers14081921
doi: 10.3390/cancers14081921
pmc: PMC9032151
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe
ID : 2019-052-1
Organisme : Jazz Pharmaceuticals (Ireland)
Références
J Med Econ. 2018 Nov;21(11):1119-1130
pubmed: 30122084
Br J Haematol. 2009 Jun;145(5):598-605
pubmed: 19344426
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Mar 01;3(3):374-381
pubmed: 27832254
Br J Cancer. 2000 Apr;82(8):1387-92
pubmed: 10780515
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Sep 10;36(26):2684-2692
pubmed: 30024784
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Nov 1;33(31):3641-9
pubmed: 26304885
Blood Adv. 2022 Feb 22;6(4):1278-1295
pubmed: 34794172
J Med Econ. 2020 Jul;23(7):714-720
pubmed: 32188326
Blood. 2014 May 22;123(21):3239-46
pubmed: 24687088
Blood. 2003 Oct 1;102(7):2395-402
pubmed: 12805060
Am J Hematol. 2015 Mar;90(3):208-14
pubmed: 25421221
Neoplasma. 2010;57(2):170-8
pubmed: 20099982
Blood. 2011 Feb 17;117(7):2137-45
pubmed: 21127174
Adv Ther. 2019 Aug;36(8):1922-1935
pubmed: 31222713
Clin Ther. 2018 May;40(5):692-703.e2
pubmed: 29673891
Eur J Haematol. 2021 May;106(5):724-733
pubmed: 33609315
Eur J Haematol. 2010 Sep;85(3):217-26
pubmed: 20456491
Leuk Res. 2013 Mar;37(3):245-50
pubmed: 23069745
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Jun 1;17(6):721-749
pubmed: 31200351
J Med Econ. 2018 Jun;21(6):556-563
pubmed: 29304724
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2019 Nov 13;11:683-694
pubmed: 32009807
Pharmacoecon Open. 2019 Jun;3(2):229-235
pubmed: 30324566
Haematologica. 1999 Oct;84(10):937-45
pubmed: 10509043
Haematologica. 2012 Dec;97(12):1916-24
pubmed: 22773600
Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2007 Mar;20(1):29-37
pubmed: 17336252
Blood. 2016 May 19;127(20):2391-405
pubmed: 27069254
Blood. 2017 Jan 26;129(4):424-447
pubmed: 27895058
Intern Med J. 2013 Aug;43(8):903-11
pubmed: 23611681
Lancet. 2010 Dec 11;376(9757):2000-8
pubmed: 21131036
Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Mar;33(3):519-527
pubmed: 27966377
Am J Hematol. 2014 Sep;89(9):874-81
pubmed: 24861848
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Nov 20;29(33):4417-23
pubmed: 21969499
Ann Hematol. 2015 Jul;94(7):1127-38
pubmed: 25791241