Real-Time Spiral CMR Is Superior to Conventional Segmented Cine-Imaging for Left-Ventricular Functional Assessment in Patients with Arrhythmia.
CMR in atrial fibrillation
CMR volumetry in arrhythmia
real-time CMR
spiral real-time CMR
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 Apr 2022
08 Apr 2022
Historique:
received:
07
02
2022
revised:
29
03
2022
accepted:
06
04
2022
entrez:
23
4
2022
pubmed:
24
4
2022
medline:
24
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
(1) Background: Segmented Cartesian Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) often fails to deliver robust assessment of cardiac function in patients with arrhythmia. We aimed to assess the performance of a tiny golden-angle spiral real-time CMR sequence at 1.5 T for left-ventricular (LV) volumetry in patients with irregular heart rhythm; (2) Methods: We validated the real-time sequence against the standard breath-hold segmented Cartesian sequence in 32 patients, of whom 11 presented with arrhythmia. End-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), stroke volume (SV), and ejection fraction (EF) were assessed. In arrhythmic patients, real-time and standard Cartesian acquisitions were compared against a reference echocardiographic modality; (3) Results: In patients with sinus rhythm, good agreements and correlations were found between the segmented and real-time methods, with only minor, non-significant underestimation of EDV for the real-time sequence (135.95 ± 30 mL vs. 137.15 ± 31,
Identifiants
pubmed: 35456181
pii: jcm11082088
doi: 10.3390/jcm11082088
pmc: PMC9025940
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Korean J Radiol. 2019 Jan;20(1):114-125
pubmed: 30627027
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2006;8(6):801-7
pubmed: 17060102
Heart. 2008 Feb;94(2):211-6
pubmed: 17135219
Magn Reson Med. 2005 Jun;53(6):1468-73
pubmed: 15906302
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016 Aug 24;18(1):50
pubmed: 27553656
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Sep;7(9):882-92
pubmed: 25129517
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Sep 20;8:728205
pubmed: 34616783
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013 Nov 14;15:102
pubmed: 24228930
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013 Sep 12;15:79
pubmed: 24028285
Invest Radiol. 2013 Mar;48(3):158-66
pubmed: 23344515
Magn Reson Med. 2021 May;85(5):2747-2760
pubmed: 33270942
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2003 Jul;5(3):439-50
pubmed: 12882075
Radiology. 2017 Jan;282(1):74-83
pubmed: 27399326
Magn Reson Med. 2013 Jul;70(1):64-74
pubmed: 22887290
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Oct 6;54(15):1407-24
pubmed: 19796734
Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Jul;28(6):862-81
pubmed: 20409660
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013 Jun 20;15:55
pubmed: 23787094
Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Jul;32(6):747-58
pubmed: 24690453
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005 Jul;22(1):59-66
pubmed: 15971180
Magn Reson Med. 2010 Oct;64(4):1089-97
pubmed: 20574967
Magn Reson Med. 2001 May;45(5):846-52
pubmed: 11323811
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2018 Dec 6;20(1):79
pubmed: 30518390
Magn Reson Med. 2016 Jun;75(6):2372-8
pubmed: 26148753
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Aug;38(2):527-33
pubmed: 11499748
Magn Reson Med. 2005 Apr;53(4):981-5
pubmed: 15799044
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2015 Jun;34(6):1262-9
pubmed: 25532172
Radiology. 2002 Mar;222(3):835-42
pubmed: 11867810
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2014 Sep 11;16:65
pubmed: 25231607
Eurasian J Med. 2021 Feb;53(1):28-33
pubmed: 33716527
Eur Radiol. 2018 Jul;28(7):3088-3096
pubmed: 29383529