Does Wim Hof Method Improve Breathing Economy during Exercise?
Wim Hof method
adolescents
breathing
diaphragm
runners
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Apr 2022
15 Apr 2022
Historique:
received:
13
03
2022
revised:
13
04
2022
accepted:
14
04
2022
entrez:
23
4
2022
pubmed:
24
4
2022
medline:
24
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
(1) Background: Breathing economy during endurance sports plays a major role in performance. Poor breathing economy is mainly characterized by excessive breathing frequency (BF) and low tidal volume (VT) due to shallow breathing. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a 4 week intervention based on the Wim Hof breathing method (WHBM) would improve breathing economy during exercise in adolescent runners. (2) Methods: 19 adolescent (16.6 ± 1.53 years) middle- and long-distance runners (11 boys and 8 girls) participated in the study. Participants were randomly divided into experimental (n = 11) and control groups (n = 8). The study was set in the transition period between competitive race seasons and both groups had a similar training program in terms of running volume and intensity over the course of the study. The experimental group performed breathing exercises every day (~20 min/day) for 4 weeks. The control group did not perform any kind of breathing exercise. The breathing exercises consisted of three sets of controlled hyperventilation and consecutive maximum breath holds. Before and after the intervention, participants performed incremental cycle ergometer testing sessions consisting of two minute stages at 1, 2, 3, and 4 W·kg−1 with breath-by-breath metabolic analysis. During the testing sessions, BF, VT, and minute ventilation (VE) were assessed and compared. (3) Results: There were no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) in BF, VT, or VE between experimental and control groups before or after the intervention. A nonsignificant small-to-large effect for an increase in VE and BF in both groups following the 4 week intervention period was observed, possibly due to a reduction in training volume and intensity owing to the down period between competitive seasons. (4) Conclusions: The 4 week intervention of WHBM did not appear to alter parameters of breathing economy during a maximal graded exercise test in adolescent runners.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35456308
pii: jcm11082218
doi: 10.3390/jcm11082218
pmc: PMC9028328
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Breathe (Sheff). 2017 Dec;13(4):298-309
pubmed: 29209423
J Mot Behav. 2018 Mar-Apr;50(2):219-227
pubmed: 28820662
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2001 Aug;85(3-4):233-9
pubmed: 11560075
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2020 Aug;60(8):1101-1109
pubmed: 32955836
J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Jun;27(6):1643-63
pubmed: 22836606
J Clin Med. 2021 Aug 10;10(16):
pubmed: 34441810
Respir Physiol. 2001 Sep;127(2-3):185-99
pubmed: 11504589
Arch Bronconeumol. 2017 May;53(5):237-244
pubmed: 28359608
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1997 May;82(5):1573-83
pubmed: 9134907
Front Sports Act Living. 2021 Aug 25;3:700757
pubmed: 34514386
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 May 20;111(20):7379-84
pubmed: 24799686
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014 Oct;24(5):764-72
pubmed: 23530708
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49074
pubmed: 23152851
J Physiother. 2013 Jun;59(2):101-7
pubmed: 23663795
Sports Med. 2002;32(9):567-81
pubmed: 12096930
Clin Rheumatol. 2016 Apr;35(4):1081-5
pubmed: 26194270
Psychosom Med. 2012 Jun;74(5):489-94
pubmed: 22685240
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1999 Mar;79(4):299-305
pubmed: 10090627
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2019 Aug;59(8):1369-1375
pubmed: 30845794
Int J Sports Med. 2004 May;25(4):284-93
pubmed: 15162248