Transplant and Recipient Factors in Prediction of Kidney Transplant Outcomes: A UK-Wide Paired Analysis.
delayed graft function
graft function
kidney transplantation
paired
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Apr 2022
15 Apr 2022
Historique:
received:
01
04
2022
revised:
08
04
2022
accepted:
12
04
2022
entrez:
23
4
2022
pubmed:
24
4
2022
medline:
24
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In kidney transplantation, the relative contribution of various donor, procedure and recipient-related factors on clinical outcomes is unknown. Previous paired studies have largely focused on examining factors predicting early outcomes, where the effect of donor factors is thought to be most important. Here, we sought to examine the relationship between early and long-term outcomes in a UK-wide paired kidney analysis. UK Transplant Registry data covering 24,090 kidney transplants performed between 2001-2018, where both kidneys from each donor were transplanted, were analysed. Case-control studies were constructed using matched pairs of kidneys from the same donor discordant for outcome, to delineate the impact of transplant and recipient factors on longer-term outcomes. Multivariable conditional logistic regression identified HLA mismatch as an important predictor of prolonged delayed graft function (DGF), in the context of a paired study controlling for the influence of donor factors, even when adjusting for early acute rejection. Prolonged DGF, but not human leucocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch, strongly predicted 12-month graft function, and impaired 12-month graft function was associated with an increased risk of graft failure. This study indicates prolonged DGF is associated with adverse long-term outcomes and suggests that alloimmunity may contribute to prolonged DGF by a mechanism distinct from typical early acute rejection.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
In kidney transplantation, the relative contribution of various donor, procedure and recipient-related factors on clinical outcomes is unknown. Previous paired studies have largely focused on examining factors predicting early outcomes, where the effect of donor factors is thought to be most important. Here, we sought to examine the relationship between early and long-term outcomes in a UK-wide paired kidney analysis.
METHODS
METHODS
UK Transplant Registry data covering 24,090 kidney transplants performed between 2001-2018, where both kidneys from each donor were transplanted, were analysed. Case-control studies were constructed using matched pairs of kidneys from the same donor discordant for outcome, to delineate the impact of transplant and recipient factors on longer-term outcomes.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Multivariable conditional logistic regression identified HLA mismatch as an important predictor of prolonged delayed graft function (DGF), in the context of a paired study controlling for the influence of donor factors, even when adjusting for early acute rejection. Prolonged DGF, but not human leucocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch, strongly predicted 12-month graft function, and impaired 12-month graft function was associated with an increased risk of graft failure.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This study indicates prolonged DGF is associated with adverse long-term outcomes and suggests that alloimmunity may contribute to prolonged DGF by a mechanism distinct from typical early acute rejection.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35456312
pii: jcm11082222
doi: 10.3390/jcm11082222
pmc: PMC9024822
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : NHS Blood and Transplant
ID : WP 15 03
Références
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006 Jun;21(6):1689-96
pubmed: 16490743
Blood Purif. 2016;42(2):170-6
pubmed: 27296631
Transplant Direct. 2021 Jun 18;7(7):e716
pubmed: 34476295
Am J Transplant. 2021 Oct;21(10):3346-3355
pubmed: 33756062
Front Immunol. 2020 May 07;11:734
pubmed: 32457738
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019 Dec 6;14(12):1781-1787
pubmed: 31676539
Transplantation. 1996 Dec 15;62(11):1571-6
pubmed: 8970609
Transplantation. 2009 Jul 27;88(2):231-6
pubmed: 19623019
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Jun 21;21(1):127
pubmed: 34154541
Transpl Int. 2018 Dec;31(12):1369-1379
pubmed: 30007072
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 29;11(1):15464
pubmed: 34326417
Transpl Int. 2000;13 Suppl 1:S52-5
pubmed: 11111961
Transplantation. 2017 Jun;101(6):1139-1143
pubmed: 28538652
Am J Transplant. 2002 Apr;2(4):366-72
pubmed: 12118860
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009 Jun;20(6):1351-8
pubmed: 19389849
Transplantation. 2012 Dec 27;94(12):1218-23
pubmed: 23154212
EBioMedicine. 2018 Feb;28:31-42
pubmed: 29398595
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015 Sep;30(9):1480-7
pubmed: 26056176
Ann Intern Med. 2009 May 5;150(9):604-12
pubmed: 19414839
Am J Kidney Dis. 2020 May;75(5):725-735
pubmed: 31812448
J Nephrol. 2008 Mar-Apr;21(2):221-8
pubmed: 18446717
Transplantation. 2014 Jan 15;97 Suppl 1:S1-S27
pubmed: 24356460
Transpl Int. 2012 Sep;25(9):918-24
pubmed: 22775290
Am J Kidney Dis. 2021 Oct;78(4):501-510.e1
pubmed: 33872689
Transplantation. 2000 Feb 27;69(4):508-14
pubmed: 10708103
Am J Transplant. 2011 Nov;11(11):2279-96
pubmed: 21929642
Clin Transplant. 2011 Mar-Apr;25(2):255-64
pubmed: 20331689