Pharmacokinetic Variability Drives Palbociclib-Induced Neutropenia in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients: Drug-Drug Interactions Are the Usual Suspects.
clinical trial
drug–drug interaction
oncology breast cancer
therapeutic drug monitoring
Journal
Pharmaceutics
ISSN: 1999-4923
Titre abrégé: Pharmaceutics
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101534003
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 Apr 2022
11 Apr 2022
Historique:
received:
08
03
2022
revised:
07
04
2022
accepted:
08
04
2022
entrez:
23
4
2022
pubmed:
24
4
2022
medline:
24
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Palbociclib is a good candidate for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) due to its narrow therapeutic range and frequency of toxicities, particularly high-grade neutropenia. In this prospective, bicentric clinical trial, we evaluated the palbociclib exposure−toxicity relationship and determined the relevant sources of palbociclib pharmacokinetic variability, including drug−drug interactions (DDI). We followed 58 patients (mean age: 62.9 years) for 1 year. The geometric median of palbociclib plasma trough concentration (Ctrough) was 74.1 ng/mL. Neutropenia occurred in 70.7% of patients (high grade in 67.2% of patients). High-grade neutropenia occurrence during the first two palbociclib cycles was higher in patients with lower neutrophil count at initiation (p = 0.002). Palbociclib plasma Ctrough was correlated with high-grade neutropenia occurrence during the first two cycles (p = 0.024, OR 5.51). Co-treatment with agents that may interfere with palbociclib PK significantly influenced palbociclib Ctrough (p < 0.05). CYP3A4/P-glycoprotein inhibitors increased by 25% palbociclib Ctrough (p = 0.035), while antacids reduced it by 20% (p = 0.036). However, DDI did not have any significant effect on high-grade neutropenia occurrence (p > 0.05). This study confirms the major role of TDM to manage palbociclib safe use from the first week of treatment, particularly the significant incidence of hematological toxicity. Moreover, this first dedicated prospective study confirmed the importance of characterizing co-treatments to limit the DDI risk with oral-targeted therapies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35456675
pii: pharmaceutics14040841
doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14040841
pmc: PMC9032884
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : INCa-Cancéropôle
ID : N°2018-E13
Références
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Mar 1;25(5):1479-1485
pubmed: 30765389
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2020 Sep 5;188:113438
pubmed: 32623316
Ann Oncol. 2010 Dec;21(12):2403-2409
pubmed: 20494962
Int J Clin Oncol. 2019 Mar;24(3):274-287
pubmed: 30515674
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2018 Sep 03;10:1758835918793326
pubmed: 30202447
Target Oncol. 2021 Jan;16(1):69-76
pubmed: 33211314
Pharmaceutics. 2021 Oct 16;13(10):
pubmed: 34684001
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 8;11(1):20055
pubmed: 34625634
Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Mar 1;21(5):995-1001
pubmed: 25501126
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Apr 15;22(8):2000-8
pubmed: 26631614
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Sep 01;21(17):
pubmed: 32883002
ESMO Open. 2021 Oct;6(5):100231
pubmed: 34509802
Oncologist. 2019 Dec;24(12):1514-1525
pubmed: 31217344
Cancer Med. 2021 Nov;10(21):7665-7672
pubmed: 34590788
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2019 May 10;11:1758835919833867
pubmed: 31205497
J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Sep;57(9):1159-1173
pubmed: 28419480
J Pharm Pract. 2020 Dec;33(6):912-914
pubmed: 31248333
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Aug;176(3):483-494
pubmed: 31065872
J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Feb;57(2):173-184
pubmed: 27402157
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2019 Apr;25(3):743-746
pubmed: 29523051
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2020 Dec;86(6):701-710
pubmed: 33037918
Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2017 Nov;6(6):614-626
pubmed: 28430398
Oncologist. 2021 May;26(5):e749-e755
pubmed: 33486783
Eur J Cancer. 2014 Aug;50(12):2020-36
pubmed: 24928190
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Apr 1;111(4):419-430
pubmed: 30032196
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Feb;111(2):477-484
pubmed: 34674222