Comparison of Syngas-Fermenting
Clostridium autoethanogenum
Clostridium ljungdahlii
Clostridium ragsdalei
autotrophic alcohol production
syngas impurities
synthesis gas fermentation
Journal
Microorganisms
ISSN: 2076-2607
Titre abrégé: Microorganisms
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101625893
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Mar 2022
22 Mar 2022
Historique:
received:
25
02
2022
revised:
17
03
2022
accepted:
18
03
2022
entrez:
23
4
2022
pubmed:
24
4
2022
medline:
24
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In recent years, syngas fermentation has emerged as a promising means for the production of fuels and platform chemicals, with a variety of acetogens efficiently converting CO-rich gases to ethanol. However, the feasibility of syngas fermentation processes is related to the occurrence of syngas impurities such as NH3, H2S, and NOX. Therefore, the effects of defined additions of NH4+, H2S, and NO3− were studied in autotrophic batch processes with C. autoethanogenum, C. ljungdahlii, and C. ragsdalei while applying continuously gassed stirred-tank bioreactors. Any initial addition of ammonium and nitrate curbed the cell growth of the Clostridia being studied and reduced the final alcohol concentrations. C. ljungdahlii showed the highest tolerance to ammonium and nitrate, whereas C. ragsdalei was even positively influenced by the presence of 0.1 g L−1 H2S. Quantitative goals for the purification of syngas were identified for each of the acetogens studied in the used experimental setup. Syngas purification should in particular focus on the NOX impurities that caused the highest inhibiting effect and maintain the concentrations of NH3 and H2S within an acceptable range (e.g., NH3 < 4560 ppm and H2S < 108 ppm) in order to avoid inhibition through the accumulation of these impurities in the bioreactor.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35456733
pii: microorganisms10040681
doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10040681
pmc: PMC9032146
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Federal Ministry of Education and Research
ID : 031B0677A
Références
Front Microbiol. 2021 Apr 15;12:655390
pubmed: 33936011
Front Microbiol. 2020 May 06;11:724
pubmed: 32435236
Front Microbiol. 2016 Jul 07;7:1036
pubmed: 27458439
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2019 Sep 23;12:228
pubmed: 31572495
Bioresour Technol. 2011 Jun;102(11):6494-501
pubmed: 21474306
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020 Mar 27;8:204
pubmed: 32292775
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2019 Feb;116(2):294-306
pubmed: 30267586
Bioresour Technol. 2011 Sep;102(17):8071-6
pubmed: 21724385
Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2018 Oct;41(10):1403-1416
pubmed: 29971481
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 Mar;77(5):1674-80
pubmed: 21216898
World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012 Apr;28(4):1553-61
pubmed: 22805937
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2014 Dec;12(12):809-21
pubmed: 25383604
Microb Biotechnol. 2020 Nov;13(6):1831-1846
pubmed: 32691533
Microb Biotechnol. 2020 Jul;13(4):1026-1038
pubmed: 32126162
Cell Syst. 2017 May 24;4(5):505-515.e5
pubmed: 28527885
Adv Appl Microbiol. 2018;103:143-221
pubmed: 29914657
J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2000 Jan;2(1):95-100
pubmed: 10937493
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2007 Aug 1;97(5):1080-6
pubmed: 17171719
J Biotechnol. 2016 Jun 20;228:82-94
pubmed: 27107467