Top-Down Controls of Bacterial Metabolism: A Case Study from a Temperate Freshwater Lake Ecosystem.
bacteria
bacterial growth efficiency
freshwater lake
heterotrophic nanoflagellates
lytic viral infection
viral production
viruses
Journal
Microorganisms
ISSN: 2076-2607
Titre abrégé: Microorganisms
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101625893
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 Mar 2022
25 Mar 2022
Historique:
received:
24
02
2022
revised:
23
03
2022
accepted:
25
03
2022
entrez:
23
4
2022
pubmed:
24
4
2022
medline:
24
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In freshwater environments, limited data exist on the impact of mortality forces (viruses and heterotrophic nanoflagellates) on bacterial growth efficiency (BGE, index of bacterial carbon metabolism) compared to resource availability. An investigation to determine the relative influence of viral lysis and flagellate predation (top-down forces) on BGE was conducted in a mesotrophic freshwater system (Lake Goule, France) with time and space. Viral abundance was significantly (p < 0.001) related to bacterial abundance by a power law function with an exponent less than 1, emphasizing that the increases in host population (bacteria) together with viruses were not proportionate. A lytic viral strategy was evident throughout the study period, with high lysis of the bacterial population (up to 60%) supported by viral production rates. Viral processes (lysis and production) that were influenced by bacterial production and heterotrophic nanoflagellate abundance had a positive impact on BGE. Estimates of BGE were variable (9.9−45.5%) due to uncoupling between two metabolic parameters—namely bacterial production and respiration. The existence of a synergistic relationship between viruses and flagellates with bacteria in Lake Goule highlighted the decisive impact of top-down agents in sustaining the bacterial carbon metabolism of non-infected population through the nature of vital resources released via mortality processes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35456766
pii: microorganisms10040715
doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10040715
pmc: PMC9031129
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
ISME J. 2015 Jun;9(6):1352-64
pubmed: 25635642
Front Microbiol. 2020 Dec 15;11:612053
pubmed: 33424815
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 13;13(3):e0194020
pubmed: 29534102
PeerJ. 2021 Nov 4;9:e12194
pubmed: 34760346
Mol Ecol. 2012 Apr;21(8):1878-96
pubmed: 22093148
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2015 Feb;91(2):1-12
pubmed: 25764557
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2002 Oct 1;42(1):137-49
pubmed: 19709273
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Mar;70(3):1506-13
pubmed: 15006772
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001 Jun;67(6):2723-33
pubmed: 11375187
Sci Rep. 2015 Sep 25;5:14217
pubmed: 26404394
Ecol Appl. 2009 Oct;19(7):1791-804
pubmed: 19831070
Environ Microbiol. 2020 Jan;22(1):369-380
pubmed: 31713276
Microb Ecol. 2014 Jan;67(1):1-12
pubmed: 24057323
Front Microbiol. 2014 Sep 05;5:453
pubmed: 25250018
Environ Microbiol. 2004 Jul;6(7):707-15
pubmed: 15186349
Front Microbiol. 2015 Mar 04;6:158
pubmed: 25788895
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2020 Feb 1;96(2):
pubmed: 31922543
Environ Microbiol. 2011 Mar;13(3):616-30
pubmed: 21054737
Nat Microbiol. 2016 Jan 25;1:15024
pubmed: 27572161
Water Res. 2017 Nov 1;124:129-138
pubmed: 28753495
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999 Oct;65(10):4475-83
pubmed: 10508078
Front Microbiol. 2019 Aug 27;10:1962
pubmed: 31507569
Mar Pollut Bull. 2020 Jul;156:111253
pubmed: 32510395
Front Microbiol. 2020 Feb 21;11:221
pubmed: 32153528
Syst Appl Microbiol. 2011 Sep;34(6):470-5
pubmed: 21596506
ISME J. 2011 May;5(5):831-42
pubmed: 21124489
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2014 Jul;12(7):519-28
pubmed: 24931044
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2019 Mar 6;85(6):
pubmed: 30635378
Environ Microbiol. 2010 Mar;12(3):628-41
pubmed: 20002137
Nat Microbiol. 2018 Jul;3(7):754-766
pubmed: 29867096
Front Microbiol. 2016 Feb 09;7:81
pubmed: 26903963
Environ Microbiol. 2014 Feb;16(2):498-511
pubmed: 24131478
Front Microbiol. 2021 May 11;12:624980
pubmed: 34046018
Microb Ecol. 2006 Aug;52(2):334-44
pubmed: 16691325