Analytical Sensitivity of Six SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Tests for Omicron versus Delta Variant.
Delta
Omicron
RT-qPCR
SARS-CoV-2
antigen
variant
Journal
Viruses
ISSN: 1999-4915
Titre abrégé: Viruses
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101509722
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 03 2022
22 03 2022
Historique:
received:
24
02
2022
revised:
15
03
2022
accepted:
17
03
2022
entrez:
23
4
2022
pubmed:
24
4
2022
medline:
27
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Rapid antigen detection (RAD) tests are commonly used for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infections. However, with the continuous emergence of new variants of concern (VOC), presenting various mutations potentially affecting the nucleocapsid protein, the analytical performances of these assays should be frequently reevaluated. One hundred and twenty samples were selected and tested with both RT-qPCR and six commercial RAD tests that are commonly sold in Belgian pharmacies. Of these, direct whole-genome sequencing identified the strains present in 116 samples, of which 70 were Delta and 46 were Omicron (BA.1 and BA.1.1 sub-lineages, respectively). The sensitivity across a wide range of Ct values (13.5 to 35.7; median = 21.3) ranged from 70.0% to 92.9% for Delta strains and from 69.6% to 78.3% for Omicron strains. When taking swabs with a low viral load (Ct > 25, corresponding to <4.9 log10 copies/mL), only the Roche RAD test showed acceptable performances for the Delta strains (80.0%), while poor performances were observed for the other RAD tests (20.0% to 40.0%). All the tested devices had poor performances for the Omicron samples with a low viral load (0.0% to 23.1%). The poor performances observed with low viral loads, particularly for the Omicron strain, is an important limitation of RAD tests, which is not sufficiently highlighted in the instructions for use of these devices.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35458384
pii: v14040654
doi: 10.3390/v14040654
pmc: PMC9031584
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Nucleocapsid Proteins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Microorganisms. 2021 Apr 10;9(4):
pubmed: 33920307
Biol Methods Protoc. 2020 Jul 18;5(1):bpaa014
pubmed: 33029559
J Virol Methods. 2021 Feb;288:114024
pubmed: 33227341
J Infect. 2021 Jun;82(6):269-275
pubmed: 33882299
J Infect. 2022 May;84(5):e64-e66
pubmed: 35217106
J Clin Med. 2021 Jan 13;10(2):
pubmed: 33450853
J Clin Virol. 2021 Nov;144:104985
pubmed: 34560340
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Sep;21(9):e290-e295
pubmed: 33636148
Med Microbiol Immunol. 2021 Dec;210(5-6):263-275
pubmed: 34415422
Ann Intern Med. 2022 May;175(5):682-690
pubmed: 35286144
J Clin Virol. 2021 Aug;141:104900
pubmed: 34171548
Int J Infect Dis. 2022 Jan;114:112-114
pubmed: 34758391
Viruses. 2022 Mar 06;14(3):
pubmed: 35336950
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Oct 7;58(12):1993-2000
pubmed: 33027042
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Jul;37:100954
pubmed: 34127960
Nature. 2022 Mar;603(7902):715-720
pubmed: 35104836