What evidence exists on the links between natural climate solutions and climate change mitigation outcomes in subtropical and tropical terrestrial regions? A systematic map protocol.
Climate change
Conservation
Land cover and land use change
Land management
Mitigation
Natural climate solutions
Nature-based solutions
Restoration
Journal
Environmental evidence
ISSN: 2047-2382
Titre abrégé: Environ Evid
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101744999
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
01
12
2021
accepted:
22
03
2022
entrez:
25
4
2022
pubmed:
26
4
2022
medline:
26
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Natural climate solutions (NCS)-actions to conserve, restore, and modify natural and modified ecosystems to increase carbon storage or avoid greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions-are increasingly regarded as important pathways for climate change mitigation, while contributing to our global conservation efforts, overall planetary resilience, and sustainable development goals. Recently, projections posit that terrestrial-based NCS can potentially capture or avoid the emission of at least 11 Gt (gigatons) of carbon dioxide equivalent a year, or roughly encompassing one third of the emissions reductions needed to meet the Paris Climate Agreement goals by 2030. NCS interventions also purport to provide co-benefits such as improved productivity and livelihoods from sustainable natural resource management, protection of locally and culturally important natural areas, and downstream climate adaptation benefits. Attention on implementing NCS to address climate change across global and national agendas has grown-however, clear understanding of which types of NCS interventions have undergone substantial study versus those that require additional evidence is still lacking. This study aims to conduct a systematic map to collate and describe the current state, distribution, and methods used for evidence on the links between NCS interventions and climate change mitigation outcomes within tropical and sub-tropical terrestrial ecosystems. Results of this study can be used to inform program and policy design and highlight critical knowledge gaps where future evaluation, research, and syntheses are needed. To develop this systematic map, we will search two bibliographic databases (including 11 indices) and 67 organization websites, backward citation chase from 39 existing evidence syntheses, and solicit information from key informants. All searches will be conducted in English and encompass subtropical and tropical terrestrial ecosystems (forests, grasslands, mangroves, agricultural areas). Search results will be screened at title and abstract, and full text levels, recording both the number of excluded articles and reasons for exclusion. Key meta-data from included articles will be coded and reported in a narrative review that will summarize trends in the evidence base, assess gaps in knowledge, and provide insights for policy, practice, and research. The data from this systematic map will be made open access. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13750-022-00268-w.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Natural climate solutions (NCS)-actions to conserve, restore, and modify natural and modified ecosystems to increase carbon storage or avoid greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions-are increasingly regarded as important pathways for climate change mitigation, while contributing to our global conservation efforts, overall planetary resilience, and sustainable development goals. Recently, projections posit that terrestrial-based NCS can potentially capture or avoid the emission of at least 11 Gt (gigatons) of carbon dioxide equivalent a year, or roughly encompassing one third of the emissions reductions needed to meet the Paris Climate Agreement goals by 2030. NCS interventions also purport to provide co-benefits such as improved productivity and livelihoods from sustainable natural resource management, protection of locally and culturally important natural areas, and downstream climate adaptation benefits. Attention on implementing NCS to address climate change across global and national agendas has grown-however, clear understanding of which types of NCS interventions have undergone substantial study versus those that require additional evidence is still lacking. This study aims to conduct a systematic map to collate and describe the current state, distribution, and methods used for evidence on the links between NCS interventions and climate change mitigation outcomes within tropical and sub-tropical terrestrial ecosystems. Results of this study can be used to inform program and policy design and highlight critical knowledge gaps where future evaluation, research, and syntheses are needed.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
To develop this systematic map, we will search two bibliographic databases (including 11 indices) and 67 organization websites, backward citation chase from 39 existing evidence syntheses, and solicit information from key informants. All searches will be conducted in English and encompass subtropical and tropical terrestrial ecosystems (forests, grasslands, mangroves, agricultural areas). Search results will be screened at title and abstract, and full text levels, recording both the number of excluded articles and reasons for exclusion. Key meta-data from included articles will be coded and reported in a narrative review that will summarize trends in the evidence base, assess gaps in knowledge, and provide insights for policy, practice, and research. The data from this systematic map will be made open access.
Supplementary Information
UNASSIGNED
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13750-022-00268-w.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35465308
doi: 10.1186/s13750-022-00268-w
pii: 268
pmc: PMC9017726
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
15Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2022.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interestsAll authors declare they have no competing interests.
Références
Sci Adv. 2017 Nov 08;3(11):e1701345
pubmed: 29134195
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 Nov;26(11):6134-6155
pubmed: 32906226
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 27;13(12):e0208523
pubmed: 30589896
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2011;2011:1506-13
pubmed: 22195215
Res Synth Methods. 2020 Sep;11(5):669-677
pubmed: 32618106
Nat Commun. 2021 May 11;12(1):2501
pubmed: 33976120
Environ Sci Policy. 2020 Dec;114:256-262
pubmed: 32922207
Sci Adv. 2018 May 16;4(5):eaas9143
pubmed: 29774239
PLoS Biol. 2021 Oct 7;19(10):e3001296
pubmed: 34618803
Science. 2019 Jan 11;363(6423):
pubmed: 30630898
Bioscience. 2017 Jun 1;67(6):534-545
pubmed: 28608869
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Mar 16;375(1794):20190126
pubmed: 31983330
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008 Feb 27;363(1492):815-30
pubmed: 17761468
Science. 2019 Oct 18;366(6463):
pubmed: 31624182
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 14;4:5
pubmed: 25588314
Glob Chang Biol. 2021 Dec;27(23):6025-6058
pubmed: 34636101
Nat Ecol Evol. 2019 Apr;3(4):539-551
pubmed: 30858594
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 25;16(3):e0248398
pubmed: 33765085
J Med Libr Assoc. 2006 Apr;94(2):130-6
pubmed: 16636704
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Oct 31;114(44):11645-11650
pubmed: 29078344