Has the COVID-19 pandemic made us more materialistic? The effect of COVID-19 and lockdown restrictions on the endorsement of materialism.

COVID‐19 attitude change consumption contextual effects materialism media consumption money

Journal

Psychology & marketing
ISSN: 0742-6046
Titre abrégé: Psychol Mark
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101696173

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2022
Historique:
received: 19 07 2021
revised: 29 11 2021
accepted: 01 12 2021
entrez: 25 4 2022
pubmed: 26 4 2022
medline: 26 4 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to an increase in the factors that typically facilitate the endorsement of materialistic values (e.g., higher media consumption, stress and anxiety, loneliness, death anxiety, and lower moods). In this paper, we examine how contextual changes affecting the antecedents of materialism influence its advocacy with a mixed-method approach. First, a correlational study (Study 1) suggests that increases in media consumption and stress and anxiety during the pandemic predicted current levels of materialism, however, these effects were limited. Second, contrary to our expectations, a longitudinal study (Study 2) shows that people's focus on money decreased during the pandemic. Last, a social media content analysis (Study 3) reveals a downward trend in users' online discourses about consumption-related behaviors, but an upward trend in brands promoting spending as a way to attain well-being. The observed effects could fuel deeper societal change in the labor market and in consumer behavior, and have further implications for individual and societal well-being in a post-pandemic world. We recommend future interventions aimed at diminishing materialistic attitudes to examine the effects of decreasing media consumption and to explore how other factors introduced by the pandemic (e.g., a health or well-being focus) might moderate its advocacy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35465462
doi: 10.1002/mar.21627
pii: MAR21627
pmc: PMC9015585
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

892-905

Informations de copyright

© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Références

Psychol Mark. 2022 May;39(5):892-905
pubmed: 35465462
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Jan;34(1):17-31
pubmed: 17989212
J Pers Assess. 1985 Feb;49(1):71-5
pubmed: 16367493
Behav Res Methods. 2008 May;40(2):457-66
pubmed: 18522056
Psychol Mark. 2020 Oct;37(10):1433-1445
pubmed: 32836727
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014 Nov;107(5):879-924
pubmed: 25347131
J Res Pers. 2009 Jun;73(3):291-306
pubmed: 20161160
J Bus Res. 2020 Sep;117:284-289
pubmed: 32536736
Front Psychol. 2012 Mar 14;3:44
pubmed: 22457655
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993 Aug;65(2):410-22
pubmed: 8366427
Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):68-78
pubmed: 11392867
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Dec;85(6):1193-202
pubmed: 14674824
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91
pubmed: 17695343
Psychol Sci. 2000 Jul;11(4):348-51
pubmed: 11273398
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 06;17(9):
pubmed: 32384598
J Consum Aff. 2021 May 31;:
pubmed: 34226753
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 13;17(14):
pubmed: 32668635

Auteurs

Olaya Moldes (O)

Department of Marketing and Strategy, Cardiff Business School Cardiff University Cardiff UK.

Denitsa Dineva (D)

Department of Marketing and Strategy, Cardiff Business School Cardiff University Cardiff UK.

Lisbeth Ku (L)

School of Applied Social Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences De Montfort University Leicester UK.

Classifications MeSH