Observer agreement of imaging measurements used for evaluation of dentofacial deformity in juvenile idiopathic arthritis.
Adolescent
Arthritis, Juvenile
/ complications
Child
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
/ methods
Dentofacial Deformities
/ pathology
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
/ methods
Male
Mandibular Condyle
/ diagnostic imaging
Temporomandibular Joint
/ diagnostic imaging
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
/ diagnostic imaging
Cephalometry
Cone-beam computed tomography
Magnetic resonance imaging
Observer agreement
Temporomandibular joint
Journal
Dento maxillo facial radiology
ISSN: 0250-832X
Titre abrégé: Dentomaxillofac Radiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7609576
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 09 2022
01 09 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
26
4
2022
medline:
24
8
2022
entrez:
25
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To examine the precision of imaging measures commonly used to assess mandibular morphology in children and adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Secondly, to compare cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the measurement of condylar height. Those included were children diagnosed with JIA during 2015-18 who had had an MRI, a CBCT of the temporomandibular joints (TMJs) and a lateral cephalogram (ceph) of the head within one month of each other. Agreement within and between observers and methods was examined using Bland-Altman mean-difference plots and 95% limits of agreement (LOA). A 95% LOA within 15% of the sample mean was considered acceptable. Minimal detectable change (MDC) within and between observers was estimated. 90 patients (33 males) were included, with a mean age of 12.8 years. For MRI, intra- and interobserver 95% LOA were relatively narrow for total mandibular length: 9.6% of the sample mean. For CBCT, condylar height, both intra- and interobserver 95% LOA were wide: 16.0 and 28.4% of the sample mean, respectively. For ceph, both intra- and interobserver 95% LOA were narrow for the SNA-angle and gonion angle: 5.9 and 8% of the sample mean, and 6.2 and 6.8%, respectively. We have identified a set of precise measurements for facial morphology assessments in JIA, including one MRI-based (total mandibular length), one CBCT-based (condylar height), and three ceph-based. Condylar height was higher for MRI than for CBCT; however, the measurement was too imprecise for clinical use. MDC was also determined for a series of measurements.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35466687
doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20210478
pmc: PMC10043626
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
20210478Références
J Rheumatol. 2004 Feb;31(2):390-2
pubmed: 14760812
Prog Orthod. 2019 Oct 21;20(1):40
pubmed: 31631241
Eur J Orthod. 1994 Apr;16(2):110-20
pubmed: 8005198
J Rheumatol. 2020 May 1;47(5):730-738
pubmed: 31523047
Eur J Orthod. 1981;3(1):9-13
pubmed: 6939595
BMJ. 2003 Jan 25;326(7382):219
pubmed: 12543843
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Nov;138(5):546.e1-8; discussion 546-7
pubmed: 21055590
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Jun;107(6):640-7
pubmed: 7771370
Eur J Orthod. 2015 Feb;37(1):13-21
pubmed: 25154725
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011 Dec;40(8):492-500
pubmed: 22065798
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Apr;58(4):1189-96
pubmed: 18383394
Acta Paediatr. 2020 Aug;109(8):1612-1619
pubmed: 31899821
Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2011 Mar;2(3-4):31-9
pubmed: 22545187
Angle Orthod. 1981 Apr;51(2):162-71
pubmed: 6942667
Radiology. 2010 Jul;256(1):191-200
pubmed: 20574096
Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2015 Dec 09;13:56
pubmed: 26646650
Insights Imaging. 2019 Aug 29;10(1):87
pubmed: 31468205
Angle Orthod. 2011 Jan;81(1):26-35
pubmed: 20936951
Eur J Orthod. 2001 Oct;23(5):569-78
pubmed: 11668876
Med Decis Making. 1991 Apr-Jun;11(2):88-94
pubmed: 1907710
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jul;22(1):85-93
pubmed: 12858311
Br J Radiol. 2015 Jan;88(1045):20140658
pubmed: 25486387
Stat Methods Med Res. 1999 Jun;8(2):135-60
pubmed: 10501650
Eur Radiol. 2020 Oct;30(10):5237-5249
pubmed: 32399709
Eur J Orthod. 1986 Aug;8(3):149-51
pubmed: 3464438
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020 Jul;72(7):907-916
pubmed: 30973675
Am J Orthod. 1971 Aug;60(2):111-27
pubmed: 5283996
J Rheumatol. 2007 Sep;34(9):1925-33
pubmed: 17696265
Eur J Orthod. 2013 Apr;35(2):191-8
pubmed: 21969524
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Feb;39(2):156-60
pubmed: 20044238
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 20;7(1):11993
pubmed: 28931867
Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2010 Apr 22;8:13
pubmed: 20412568
Angle Orthod. 2019 Mar;89(2):317-332
pubmed: 30423256
J Rheumatol. 2011 Mar;38(3):510-5
pubmed: 21159837
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020 May 1;105(5):
pubmed: 32140730
Acta Odontol Scand. 1994 Feb;52(1):43-50
pubmed: 8184679
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 13;13(3):e0194177
pubmed: 29534095
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 16;10(1):11722
pubmed: 32678176
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Sep;136(3):312.e1-10; discussion 312-3
pubmed: 19732656
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Sep;104(3):402-11
pubmed: 17709072
J Rheumatol. 2019 May;46(5):518-522
pubmed: 30647179
Lancet. 2011 Jun 18;377(9783):2138-49
pubmed: 21684384
Eur J Orthod. 1981;3(1):15-20
pubmed: 6939591
Comput Biol Med. 1990;20(5):337-40
pubmed: 2257734