Facets of conscientiousness and motoric cognitive risk syndrome.
Cognitive complaint
Conscientiousness
Motoric cognitive risk
Walking speed
Journal
Journal of psychiatric research
ISSN: 1879-1379
Titre abrégé: J Psychiatr Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0376331
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2022
07 2022
Historique:
received:
01
02
2022
revised:
24
03
2022
accepted:
30
03
2022
pubmed:
26
4
2022
medline:
18
6
2022
entrez:
25
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Conscientiousness is related to a lower risk of motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR), a pre-dementia syndrome characterized by slow gait speed and cognitive complaints. The present study examines which facets of conscientiousness are related to concurrent and incident MCR. Participants were dementia-free older adults aged 65-99 years (N = 6001) from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS). Baseline data on conscientiousness facets and MCR (cognitive complaints and gait speed) were collected in 2008/2010, along with the covariates: demographic factors, cognition, physical activity, disease burden, depressive symptoms, and body mass index (BMI). MCR was assessed again in 2012/2014 and 2016/2018. Controlling for demographic factors, higher industriousness was related to a nearly 30% lower likelihood of concurrent MCR (Odds Ratio [OR] = 0.75, 95%CI: 0.67-0.85, p < .001) and to about 60% reduced risk of incident MCR (Hazard ratio [HR] = 0.63, 95%CI: 0.56-0.71, p < .001). Self-control, order, and responsibility were also associated with a lower likelihood of concurrent (OR range: 0.82-0.88) and incident (HR range: 0.72-0.82) MCR. Traditionalism (HR = 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75-0.93, p < .01) and virtue (HR = 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75-0.93, p < .01) were related to a lower risk of incident MCR. Cognition, physical activity, disease burden, depressive symptoms, and BMI partially accounted for these associations. Industriousness is the facet of conscientiousness with the strongest association with risk of MCR. This facet could be targeted in interventions to reduce MCR and, ultimately, dementia.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35468428
pii: S0022-3956(22)00179-0
doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.03.050
pmc: PMC9843494
mid: NIHMS1863683
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
73-77Subventions
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG053297
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG068093
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R56 AG064952
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : U01 AG009740
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Références
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013 Apr;68(4):412-8
pubmed: 22987797
J Pers Assess. 1995 Feb;64(1):21-50
pubmed: 16367732
J Psychiatr Res. 2018 Dec;107:110-113
pubmed: 30384091
Psychol Med. 2018 Apr;48(6):974-982
pubmed: 28874220
J Pers. 2022 Apr;90(2):121-132
pubmed: 34169528
Neurology. 2014 Dec 9;83(24):2278-84
pubmed: 25361778
Psychol Aging. 2017 Mar;32(2):131-138
pubmed: 28287783
Alzheimers Dement. 2014 Mar;10(2):179-86
pubmed: 23706517
J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;59(1):77-84
pubmed: 28582865
Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2020 Nov 24;17(1):20
pubmed: 33292163
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jul;68(7):1554-1559
pubmed: 32488931
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Feb;69(2):381-388
pubmed: 32997804
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Apr;68(4):803-808
pubmed: 31880326
J Nutr Health Aging. 2021;25(9):1090-1095
pubmed: 34725666
Alzheimers Dement. 2016 May;12(5):556-64
pubmed: 26545790
Neurology. 2019 Mar 26;92(13):e1427-e1434
pubmed: 30737336
J Pers. 1992 Jun;60(2):175-215
pubmed: 1635039
Ageing Res Rev. 2020 Mar;58:101022
pubmed: 31996326
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2011 Jul;66 Suppl 1:i162-71
pubmed: 21743047
J Psychosom Res. 2019 Jan;116:1-5
pubmed: 30654983
Psychol Health. 2018 Sep;33(9):1100-1115
pubmed: 29718717
Pers Individ Dif. 2020 Mar 1;155:
pubmed: 32863506
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Jan;19(1):53-58
pubmed: 28899662