Identification of SARS-CoV-2 variants using viral sequencing for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention genomic surveillance program.
COVID-19
Centers for Disease Control
Cycle threshold
Lineage
Next generation sequencing
Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction
SARS-CoV-2
Variant
Journal
BMC infectious diseases
ISSN: 1471-2334
Titre abrégé: BMC Infect Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968551
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 Apr 2022
25 Apr 2022
Historique:
received:
01
12
2021
accepted:
11
04
2022
entrez:
26
4
2022
pubmed:
27
4
2022
medline:
28
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention contracted with laboratories to sequence the SARS-CoV-2 genome from positive samples across the United States to enable public health officials to investigate the impact of variants on disease severity as well as the effectiveness of vaccines and treatment. Herein we present the initial results correlating RT-PCR quality control metrics with sample collection and sequencing methods from full SARS-CoV-2 viral genomic sequencing of 24,441 positive patient samples between April and June 2021. RT-PCR confirmed (N Gene Ct value < 30) positive patient samples, with nucleic acid extracted from saliva, nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs were selected for viral whole genome SARS-CoV-2 sequencing. Sequencing was performed using Illumina COVIDSeq™ protocol on either the NextSeq550 or NovaSeq6000 systems. Informatic variant calling, and lineage analysis were performed using DRAGEN COVID Lineage applications on Illumina's Basespace cloud analytical system. All sequence data and variant calls were uploaded to NCBI and GISAID. An association was observed between higher sequencing coverage, quality, and samples with a lower Ct value, with < 27 being optimal, across both sequencing platforms and sample collection methods. Both nasopharyngeal swabs and saliva samples were found to be optimal samples of choice for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance sequencing studies, both in terms of strain identification and sequencing depth of coverage, with NovaSeq 6000 providing higher coverage than the NextSeq 550. The most frequent variants identified were the B.1.617.2 Delta (India) and P.1 Gamma (Brazil) variants in the samples sequenced between April 2021 and June 2021. At the time of submission, the most common variant > 99% of positives sequenced was Omicron. These initial analyses highlight the importance of sequencing platform, sample collection methods, and RT-PCR Ct values in guiding surveillance efforts. These surveillance studies evaluating genetic changes of SARS-CoV-2 have been identified as critical by the CDC that can affect many aspects of public health including transmission, disease severity, diagnostics, therapeutics, and vaccines.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention contracted with laboratories to sequence the SARS-CoV-2 genome from positive samples across the United States to enable public health officials to investigate the impact of variants on disease severity as well as the effectiveness of vaccines and treatment. Herein we present the initial results correlating RT-PCR quality control metrics with sample collection and sequencing methods from full SARS-CoV-2 viral genomic sequencing of 24,441 positive patient samples between April and June 2021.
METHODS
METHODS
RT-PCR confirmed (N Gene Ct value < 30) positive patient samples, with nucleic acid extracted from saliva, nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs were selected for viral whole genome SARS-CoV-2 sequencing. Sequencing was performed using Illumina COVIDSeq™ protocol on either the NextSeq550 or NovaSeq6000 systems. Informatic variant calling, and lineage analysis were performed using DRAGEN COVID Lineage applications on Illumina's Basespace cloud analytical system. All sequence data and variant calls were uploaded to NCBI and GISAID.
RESULTS
RESULTS
An association was observed between higher sequencing coverage, quality, and samples with a lower Ct value, with < 27 being optimal, across both sequencing platforms and sample collection methods. Both nasopharyngeal swabs and saliva samples were found to be optimal samples of choice for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance sequencing studies, both in terms of strain identification and sequencing depth of coverage, with NovaSeq 6000 providing higher coverage than the NextSeq 550. The most frequent variants identified were the B.1.617.2 Delta (India) and P.1 Gamma (Brazil) variants in the samples sequenced between April 2021 and June 2021. At the time of submission, the most common variant > 99% of positives sequenced was Omicron.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
These initial analyses highlight the importance of sequencing platform, sample collection methods, and RT-PCR Ct values in guiding surveillance efforts. These surveillance studies evaluating genetic changes of SARS-CoV-2 have been identified as critical by the CDC that can affect many aspects of public health including transmission, disease severity, diagnostics, therapeutics, and vaccines.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35468749
doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07374-7
pii: 10.1186/s12879-022-07374-7
pmc: PMC9035976
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
404Subventions
Organisme : NCCDPHP CDC HHS
ID : 75D30121C10587
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Dec;113:12-14
pubmed: 34601145
Cell. 2021 Apr 29;184(9):2384-2393.e12
pubmed: 33794143
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Mar 10;:
pubmed: 35271728
Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Jun;9(6):562-564
pubmed: 33887248
Nature. 2021 Aug;596(7871):273-275
pubmed: 34111888
Genes (Basel). 2020 Aug 17;11(8):
pubmed: 32824573
JAMA. 2021 Sep 21;326(11):1065-1067
pubmed: 34387653
Cell. 2021 Apr 29;184(9):2348-2361.e6
pubmed: 33730597
BMJ. 2020 Dec 16;371:m4857
pubmed: 33328153
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 17;16(2):e0247115
pubmed: 33596239
Infect Genet Evol. 2021 Nov;95:105038
pubmed: 34403832
Nat Med. 2021 May;27(5):917-924
pubmed: 33772244
Nat Commun. 2021 Jun 23;12(1):3903
pubmed: 34162869
Expert Rev Vaccines. 2021 Oct;20(10):1201-1209
pubmed: 34488546
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Jun 15;11(6):
pubmed: 34203738
Viruses. 2020 Aug 15;12(8):
pubmed: 32824272
STAR Protoc. 2021 Sep 17;2(3):100755
pubmed: 34368787
JAMA. 2021 Feb 9;325(6):529-531
pubmed: 33404586
Cell Res. 2021 Oct;31(10):1130-1133
pubmed: 34433900
BMC Med. 2021 Oct 1;19(1):255
pubmed: 34593004