Competent and deficient provision of childbirth services: a descriptive observational study assessing the quality of intrapartum care in two provinces of the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Intrapartum care
Maternal care
Quality of care
Journal
BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 Apr 2022
25 Apr 2022
Historique:
received:
04
10
2021
accepted:
25
02
2022
entrez:
26
4
2022
pubmed:
27
4
2022
medline:
28
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A majority of women in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) give birth in a health facility, but maternal and newborn mortality remains high. In rural areas, the quality of facility-based delivery care is often low. This study examines clinical quality of intrapartum care in two provinces of the DRC. We observed process and input elements of delivery care provision at 29 facilities in Kwilu and Kwango provinces. Distinguishing non-performance attributable to provider behavior vs. input constraints, we compared both providers' adherence to clinical standards ("competent care") and non-adherence to processes for which required inputs were available ("deficient care"). Observing a total of 69 deliveries, care was most competent for partograph use (75% cases) and hemorrhage prevention (73%), but least for postpartum monitoring (4%). Competent care was significantly associated with higher case volumes (p = ·03), skilled birth attendance (p = ·05), and nulliparous women (p = ·02). Care was most deficient for infection prevention (62%) and timely care (49%) and associated with cases observed at hospitals and lower delivery volume. Low quality was commonly not a result of missing equipment or supplies but related to providers' non-adherence to standard protocols. Low case volumes and the absence of skilled attendants seemed to be main factors for sub-standard quality care. Birth assistance during labor stage 2 was the only intrapartum stage heavily affected by the unavailability of essential equipment. Future interventions should strengthen links between birth attendants' practice to clinical protocols.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
A majority of women in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) give birth in a health facility, but maternal and newborn mortality remains high. In rural areas, the quality of facility-based delivery care is often low. This study examines clinical quality of intrapartum care in two provinces of the DRC.
METHODS
METHODS
We observed process and input elements of delivery care provision at 29 facilities in Kwilu and Kwango provinces. Distinguishing non-performance attributable to provider behavior vs. input constraints, we compared both providers' adherence to clinical standards ("competent care") and non-adherence to processes for which required inputs were available ("deficient care").
RESULTS
RESULTS
Observing a total of 69 deliveries, care was most competent for partograph use (75% cases) and hemorrhage prevention (73%), but least for postpartum monitoring (4%). Competent care was significantly associated with higher case volumes (p = ·03), skilled birth attendance (p = ·05), and nulliparous women (p = ·02). Care was most deficient for infection prevention (62%) and timely care (49%) and associated with cases observed at hospitals and lower delivery volume.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Low quality was commonly not a result of missing equipment or supplies but related to providers' non-adherence to standard protocols. Low case volumes and the absence of skilled attendants seemed to be main factors for sub-standard quality care. Birth assistance during labor stage 2 was the only intrapartum stage heavily affected by the unavailability of essential equipment. Future interventions should strengthen links between birth attendants' practice to clinical protocols.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35468822
doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07737-5
pii: 10.1186/s12913-022-07737-5
pmc: PMC9040341
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
551Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
J Pak Med Assoc. 2012 Jul;62(7):694-8
pubmed: 23866518
Reprod Health. 2020 Dec 17;17(Suppl 3):182
pubmed: 33334362
Bull World Health Organ. 2017 May 1;95(5):368-374
pubmed: 28479638
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Dec;6(12):e1297-e1308
pubmed: 30361107
Bull World Health Organ. 2017 Jul 01;95(7):491-502
pubmed: 28670014
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Nov 29;19(1):915
pubmed: 31783756
Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Spring;1(2):77-81
pubmed: 18769668
JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Apr;169(4):349-57
pubmed: 25686357
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Oct;5(10):
pubmed: 33055093
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Nov;6(11):e1196-e1252
pubmed: 30196093
Lancet. 2005 Mar 26-Apr 1;365(9465):1175-88
pubmed: 15794973
Lancet Glob Health. 2016 Nov;4(11):e845-e855
pubmed: 27670090
Reprod Health. 2019 Jul 15;16(1):102
pubmed: 31307497
PLoS Med. 2017 Dec 12;14(12):e1002464
pubmed: 29232377
Niger J Clin Pract. 2010 Jun;13(2):200-4
pubmed: 20499756
Reprod Health. 2020 Mar 14;17(1):36
pubmed: 32171296
Gates Open Res. 2019 Jul 23;3:13
pubmed: 31410393
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 7;10(6):e036121
pubmed: 32513888
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Jan 18;19(1):37
pubmed: 30658706
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 15;10(4):e0123968
pubmed: 25875252
J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2013 Jan;11(23):1-5
pubmed: 23787516
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 24;12(2):e0172860
pubmed: 28234990