The utility of magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer diagnosis in the Australian setting.
ERSPC risk calculator
active surveillance
biopsy
multiparametric magenetic resonance imaging
prostate Cancer
Journal
BJUI compass
ISSN: 2688-4526
Titre abrégé: BJUI Compass
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101764975
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2021
Nov 2021
Historique:
received:
01
02
2021
revised:
10
05
2021
accepted:
12
05
2021
entrez:
27
4
2022
pubmed:
28
4
2022
medline:
28
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To investigate the utility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for prostate cancer diagnosis in the Australian setting. All consecutive men who underwent a prostate biopsy (transperineal or transrectal) at Royal Melbourne Hospital between July 2017 to June 2019 were included, totalling 332 patients. Data were retrospectively collected from patient records. For each individual patient, the risk of prostate cancer diagnosis at biopsy based on clinical findings was determined using the European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) risk calculator, with and without incorporation of MRI findings. MRI has good diagnostic accuracy for clinically significant prostate cancer. A PI-RADS 2 or lower finding has a negative predictive value of 96% for clinically significant cancer, and a PI-RADS 3, 4 or 5 MRI scan has a sensitivity of 93%. However, MRI has a false negative rate of 6.5% overall for clinically significant prostate cancers. Pre- biopsy MRI may reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies, as up to 50.0% of negative or ISUP1 biopsies have MRI PI-RADS 2 or lower. Incorporation of MRI findings into the ERSPC calculator improved predictive performance for all prostate cancer diagnoses (AUC 0.77 vs 0.71, MRI has good sensitivity and negative predictive value for clinically significant prostate cancers. It is useful as a pre-biopsy tool and can be used to significantly reduce the number of unnecessary prostate biopsies. However, MRI does not significantly improve risk predictions for clinically significant cancers when incorporated into the ERSPC risk calculator.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35474704
doi: 10.1002/bco2.99
pii: BCO299
pmc: PMC8988779
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
377-384Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. BJUI Compass published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International Company.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have nothing to disclose, and there is no conflict of interest to declare. This paper is not based on communication to a society or meeting.
Références
BJU Int. 2017 Dec;120(6):774-781
pubmed: 28207981
BJU Int. 2017 Nov;120 Suppl 3:43-50
pubmed: 28749035
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 10;9(3):e022457
pubmed: 30858156
Biometrics. 2008 Mar;64(1):10-9
pubmed: 17501937
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Sep 15;96(18):1358-67
pubmed: 15367568
N Engl J Med. 2012 Aug 16;367(7):595-605
pubmed: 22894572
Urol Oncol. 2014 Jan;32(1):45.e17-22
pubmed: 24055430
Can Urol Assoc J. 2015 May-Jun;9(5-6):171-8
pubmed: 26225165
Eur Urol Focus. 2017 Oct;3(4-5):487-497
pubmed: 28753804
J Urol. 2016 Aug;196(2):405-11
pubmed: 26920466
Urol Oncol. 2015 Jan;33(1):17.e1-17.e7
pubmed: 25443268
Eur Urol. 2016 Jan;69(1):16-40
pubmed: 26427566
Eur Urol. 2010 Jan;57(1):79-85
pubmed: 19733959
Eur Urol. 2019 Feb;75(2):310-318
pubmed: 30082150
JAMA. 1998 May 20;279(19):1542-7
pubmed: 9605898
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Jul 7;102(13):950-8
pubmed: 20562373
Lancet. 2017 Feb 25;389(10071):815-822
pubmed: 28110982
BJUI Compass. 2021 Jun 04;2(6):377-384
pubmed: 35474704
Eur Urol. 2016 Apr;69(4):592-598
pubmed: 26542947
Ann Diagn Pathol. 2016 Feb;20:48-51
pubmed: 26750655
J Urol. 2016 May;195(5):1428-1435
pubmed: 26529298
Transl Androl Urol. 2018 Feb;7(1):18-26
pubmed: 29594016