A multi-institutional randomized controlled trial comparing first-generation transrectal high-resolution micro-ultrasound with conventional frequency transrectal ultrasound for prostate biopsy.
ExactVu
PRI‐MUS
high‐frequency ultrasound
micro‐ultrasound
prostate biopsy
prostate cancer
Journal
BJUI compass
ISSN: 2688-4526
Titre abrégé: BJUI Compass
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101764975
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2021
Mar 2021
Historique:
received:
18
10
2020
accepted:
21
10
2020
entrez:
27
4
2022
pubmed:
28
11
2020
medline:
28
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To study high-frequency 29 MHz transrectal side-fire micro-ultrasound (micro-US) for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) on prostate biopsy, and validate an image interpretation protocol for micro-US imaging of the prostate. A prospective randomized clinical trial was performed where 1676 men with indications for prostate biopsy and without known prostate cancer were randomized 1:1 to micro-US vs conventional end-fire ultrasound (conv-US) transrectal-guided prostate biopsy across five sites in North America. The trial was split into two phases, before and after training on a micro-US image interpretation protocol that was developed during the trial using data from the pre-training micro-US arm. Investigators received a standardized training program mid-trial, and the post-training micro-US data were used to examine the training effect. Detection of csPCa (the primary outcome) was no better with the first-generation micro-US system than with conv-US in the overall population (34.6% vs 36.6%, respectively, Micro-US provided no clear benefit over conv-US for the detection of csPCa at biopsy. However, it became evident during the trial that training and increasing experience with this novel technology improved the performance of this first-generation system.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35474889
doi: 10.1002/bco2.59
pii: BCO259
pmc: PMC8988781
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
126-133Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. BJUI Compass published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International Company.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Dr. Pavlovich reports grants and personal fees from Exact Imaging during the conduct of the study.
Références
Urol Oncol. 2014 Jan;32(1):34.e27-32
pubmed: 23558161
Eur Urol. 2017 Feb;71(2):174-180
pubmed: 27236496
Can Urol Assoc J. 2019 Mar;13(3):E70-E77
pubmed: 30169149
Urol Case Rep. 2017 Nov 21;16:98-100
pubmed: 29204363
Br J Radiol. 2012 Nov;85 Spec No 1:S3-17
pubmed: 22844031
Front Oncol. 2019 Dec 10;9:1368
pubmed: 31921633
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10;378(19):1767-1777
pubmed: 29552975
Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 Mar;66:86-92
pubmed: 29108869
Eur Urol. 2016 Jan;69(1):16-40
pubmed: 26427566
Lancet. 2017 Feb 25;389(10071):815-822
pubmed: 28110982
Eur Urol Oncol. 2019 May;2(3):329-332
pubmed: 31200848
J Urol. 2016 Aug;196(2):562-9
pubmed: 26791931
Eur Radiol. 2012 Apr;22(4):746-57
pubmed: 22322308
J Urol. 2009 May;181(5):2077-82; discussion 2082-3
pubmed: 19286200
J Urol. 2000 Aug;164(2):400-4
pubmed: 10893595
BJU Int. 2018 Dec;122(6):946-958
pubmed: 29679430
Eur Urol. 2017 Aug;72(2):250-266
pubmed: 28336078
J Urol. 2020 May;203(5):918-925
pubmed: 31821099
Urology. 2012 Jul;80(1):15-8
pubmed: 22578920
Eur Urol. 2019 Feb;75(2):300-309
pubmed: 30017404
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986 Jun;146(6):1187-91
pubmed: 2422909
Eur Urol. 2019 Sep;76(3):340-351
pubmed: 30898406
JAMA. 2015 Jan 27;313(4):390-7
pubmed: 25626035
BJUI Compass. 2020 Nov 28;2(2):126-133
pubmed: 35474889
World J Urol. 2020 May;38(5):1201-1206
pubmed: 31309290