Surgical innovation revisited: A historical narrative of the minimally invasive "Agarwal sliding-clip renorrhaphy" technique for partial nephrectomy and its application to an Australian cohort.
complications
partial nephrectomy
renorrhaphy
surgical history
surgical techniques
Journal
BJUI compass
ISSN: 2688-4526
Titre abrégé: BJUI Compass
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101764975
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2021
May 2021
Historique:
received:
03
12
2020
revised:
14
02
2021
accepted:
14
02
2021
entrez:
27
4
2022
pubmed:
28
4
2022
medline:
28
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To evaluate local clinical outcomes of sliding clip renorrhaphy, from inception to current utilization for open, laparoscopic, and robotically assisted partial nephrectomy. We reviewed prospectively maintained databases of three surgeons performing partial nephrectomies with the sliding-clip technique at teaching hospitals between 2005 and 2019. Baseline characteristics, operative parameters, including surgical approach, RENAL Nephrometry Score, and post-operative outcomes, including Clavien-Dindo classification of complications, were recorded for 76 consecutive cases. We compared perioperative and 90-day events with patient and tumor characteristics, stratified by operative approach and case complexity, using Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables and the Chi-squared or Fisher's exact test, for binary and categorical variables, respectively. Open surgery (n = 15) reduced ischemia time and operative time, but increased hospital admission time. Pre- and post-operative estimated glomerular filtration rates did not change significantly by operative approach. Older patients ( The sliding-clip technique for partial nephrectomy was first described by Agarwal et al and has low complication rates, acceptable operative time, and preserves renal function across open and minimally invasive surgeries. This series encompasses the initial learning curve with developing the technique through to present-day emergence as a routine standard of practice.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35475136
doi: 10.1002/bco2.78
pii: BCO278
pmc: PMC8988750
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
211-218Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. BJUI Compass published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International Company.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have no relevant disclosures pertaining to this manuscript.
Références
Eur Urol. 2011 Apr;59(4):543-52
pubmed: 21186077
Eur Urol. 2006 Oct;50(4):732-7
pubmed: 16930815
J Endourol. 2015 May;29(5):548-55
pubmed: 25616087
BJU Int. 2019 Jun;123(6):923-946
pubmed: 30216617
Eur Urol. 2007 Jun;51(6):1606-15
pubmed: 17140723
J Urol. 2017 Sep;198(3):520-529
pubmed: 28479239
Urology. 2000 Jul;56(1):58-62
pubmed: 10869624
Int J Urol. 2012 Mar;19(3):273-6
pubmed: 22168748
Int J Urol. 2014 Sep;21(9):865-73
pubmed: 24780100
J Endourol. 2007 Apr;21(4):423-8
pubmed: 17451336
Urology. 2003 Jan;61(1):99-104
pubmed: 12559277
Eur Urol. 2014 Feb;65(2):372-7
pubmed: 23850254
Eur Urol. 2009 Mar;55(3):592-9
pubmed: 19144457
Scand J Urol. 2018 Oct - Dec;52(5-6):401-406
pubmed: 30336721
J Robot Surg. 2008 Sep;2(3):139-40
pubmed: 27628249
J Urol. 2005 Mar;173(3):705-8
pubmed: 15711247
J Endourol. 2020 Aug;34(8):856-861
pubmed: 32336144
J Urol. 2009 Sep;182(3):844-53
pubmed: 19616235
Urology. 2005 Nov;66(5):976-80
pubmed: 16286106
Eur Urol. 2005 Apr;47(4):488-93; discussion 493
pubmed: 15774247
BJUI Compass. 2021 Mar 12;2(3):211-218
pubmed: 35475136
BJU Int. 2019 Nov;124 Suppl 1:4
pubmed: 31746142
Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13
pubmed: 15273542
Urology. 2011 Dec;78(6):1338-44
pubmed: 22001098
Urology. 2007 Aug;70(2):358-9
pubmed: 17826508
Eur Urol. 2019 May;75(5):799-810
pubmed: 30803729
Eur Urol. 2006 Feb;49(2):337-42; discussion 342-3
pubmed: 16413957
BJU Int. 2007 Oct;100(4):967-70
pubmed: 17822478
J Urol. 2004 Dec;172(6 Pt 1):2292-5
pubmed: 15538251
J Urol. 2002 Feb;167(2 Pt 1):469-7; discussion 475-6
pubmed: 11792899