Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of sepiolite for all animal species (Sepiol S.A and Tolsa, S.A).
all animal species
anticaking agent
binder
efficacy
example: sepiolite
safety
thickener‐suspending agent
Journal
EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority
ISSN: 1831-4732
Titre abrégé: EFSA J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101642076
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2022
Apr 2022
Historique:
entrez:
27
4
2022
pubmed:
28
4
2022
medline:
28
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the re-evaluation of the authorisation of sepiolite as a feed additive for all animal species. The FEEDAP Panel considered that sepiolite is unlikely to be absorbed. Harmful amounts of residues of any chemical component in edible tissues/products, as a consequence of the use of sepiolite as a feed additive, are not expected. Sepiolite is not genotoxic and does not induce any toxicity effects following oral administration and, therefore, it was considered safe for the consumers. The additive was considered safe for dairy cows at the recommended use level with a safety factor of 2.5. The conclusion was extrapolated to other dairy ruminants but owing to the lack of sufficient data, no conclusions can be drawn on the safety of the additive for the other target species/categories. Based on the results of a chronic inhalation toxicity study, the additive is considered a respiratory irritant. Owing to the dusting potential of the additive and its silica content, handling the additive was considered a risk by inhalation for the users. It is not irritant or corrosive to skin or eyes. Due to the nickel content, it is considered a skin and respiratory sensitiser. The additive was considered safe for the environment. The FEEDAP Panel concluded that sepiolite was efficacious as a thickener-suspending agent, binder and anticaking agent in feed for all animal species under the proposed conditions of use.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35475164
doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7250
pii: EFS27250
pmc: PMC9019822
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e07250Informations de copyright
© 2022 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA on behalf of the European Food Safety Authority.
Références
Ann Rech Vet. 1991;22(1):71-5
pubmed: 1828334
EFSA J. 2022 Apr 20;20(4):e07250
pubmed: 35475164
EFSA J. 2018 May 07;16(5):e05274
pubmed: 32625911
EFSA J. 2019 Apr 05;17(4):e05648
pubmed: 32626279
Food Chem Toxicol. 2008 Feb;46(2):490-3
pubmed: 17905503
EFSA J. 2017 Oct 17;15(10):e05023
pubmed: 32625313
EFSA J. 2017 Oct 17;15(10):e05021
pubmed: 32625311
Poult Sci. 1990 Dec;69(12):2165-9
pubmed: 2150697
EFSA J. 2017 Oct 17;15(10):e05022
pubmed: 32625312
Br Poult Sci. 1992 Dec;33(5):1077-84
pubmed: 1493555
Br J Ind Med. 1987 Nov;44(11):749-63
pubmed: 2961365