Extending UTAUT with national identity and fairness to understand user adoption of DCEP in China.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 04 2022
27 04 2022
Historique:
received:
21
11
2021
accepted:
15
04
2022
entrez:
28
4
2022
pubmed:
29
4
2022
medline:
30
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The introduction of digital currency electronic payment (DCEP) by the Central Bank of China is conducive to the central bank's timely grasp of macroeconomic dynamics and the internationalization of RMB. As DCEP is one of the first digital currencies issued by the central bank to be used on a large scale internationally, it is necessary to conduct research on its user adoption. Therefore, this research extends the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) to explore factors affecting the adoption of DCEP. The researchers cooperated with city banks that have started to use DCEP, and distributed questionnaires to users in the lobbies of these banks. A total of 295 valid questionnaires were empirically examined with Smart-PLS. The results indicate that perceived fairness, habits, social influence and national identity have significant effects on usage, with p values less than 0.05. National identity is shown to be a significant moderator of the relationships between perceived fairness, habit, perceived risk and usage, with p values less than 0.05. National identity is shown to have no moderating effect between social influence and usage, with a p value greater than 0.05. This research provides the central bank and the government with suggestions to increase user enthusiasm and reduce user perceived risks, thereby promoting the widespread use of DCEP.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35477990
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10927-0
pii: 10.1038/s41598-022-10927-0
pmc: PMC9046427
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
6856Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Transp Res Part A Policy Pract. 2021 Jun;148:183-198
pubmed: 33776251
Heliyon. 2020 Mar 25;6(3):e03626
pubmed: 32258475
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 5;16(2):e0245964
pubmed: 33544745
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 4;15(6):e0234155
pubmed: 32497123
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2017 Apr;12(2):87-96
pubmed: 28421884