Impact of an ambulatory care pharmacist on provider relative value units in a rural clinic.

Health services accessibility Patient care Pharmaceutical services Pharmacist Pharmacy Physicians

Journal

Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy
ISSN: 2667-2766
Titre abrégé: Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9918266300706676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2022
Historique:
received: 07 11 2021
revised: 09 12 2021
accepted: 09 12 2021
entrez: 28 4 2022
pubmed: 29 4 2022
medline: 29 4 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Collaborative team-based care models have been shown to improve the quality of care provided to patients and may increase productivity along with patient access to care. Productivity is often tracked via work relative value units (wRVU). The primary objective of this project was to evaluate how a collaborative practice model affects tracked productivity. Data regarding wRVU were retrospectively extracted from the electronic medical record from a single center. De-identified data points included total number of patients seen and level of service billed for the visit. Visits were grouped as collaborative (physician-pharmacist) or independent (physician alone). Relative value unit totals were calculated separately for individual physicians and pharmacy visits and also combined for collaborative team wRVU totals. Wilcoxon and descriptive statistics were used for analysis. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS v 9.4 (Cary, NC). A total of 624 patient visits were reviewed. Total number of patients seen by physicians working in collaboration was on average 19.25 per day versus 12.9 per day for those working independently. When evaluating only the average per encounter wRVU for each provider removing collaborative patients, the three providers who worked in the collaborative model averaged 1.45, 1.48, and 1.55 wRVU per patient respectively Physicians working in collaboration with a pharmacist were able to bill at a higher level on average suggesting more productivity.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35478518
doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2021.100098
pii: S2667-2766(21)00098-6
pmc: PMC9030713
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

100098

Informations de copyright

© 2021 The Authors.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

All other authors have no conflicts of interest.

Références

J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Dec;24(12):1273-1276
pubmed: 30479200
J Pharm Pract. 2021 Oct;34(5):746-749
pubmed: 32072849
Ann Pharmacother. 2013 Jun;47(6):781-9
pubmed: 23656751
Ann Pharmacother. 2018 Sep;52(9):876-883
pubmed: 29642719
Pharmacy (Basel). 2019 Dec 30;8(1):
pubmed: 31905902
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2018 Jan;20(1):88-95
pubmed: 29237095
J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash). 1999 Mar-Apr;39(2):127-35
pubmed: 10079647
J Fam Pract. 2017 Dec;66(12):E1-E8
pubmed: 29202145
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020 Jan;16(1):102-107
pubmed: 30956095

Auteurs

Christina E DeRemer (CE)

Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, USA.

Nicole A Perez (NA)

Department of Pharmacy Services, Jackson Memorial Hospital, USA.

Kimberly Middleton (K)

Department of Pharmacy Services, Jackson Memorial Hospital, USA.

Jason Konopack (J)

Family Medicine UCF College of Medicine, USA.

Eric Dietrich (E)

Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, USA.

Classifications MeSH