Improving Shared Decision Making in Vascular Surgery: A Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomised Trial.
Decision support tools
OPTION-5 instrument
Shared decision-making
Vascular surgery
Journal
European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery
ISSN: 1532-2165
Titre abrégé: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9512728
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2022
07 2022
Historique:
received:
02
11
2021
revised:
25
03
2022
accepted:
15
04
2022
pubmed:
29
4
2022
medline:
31
8
2022
entrez:
28
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Different treatment options are available and feasible for various vascular surgical disorders. Hence, vascular surgery seems an area par excellence for shared decision making (SDM), in which clinicians incorporate the patient's preferences into the final treatment decision. However, current SDM levels in vascular surgical outpatient clinics are below expectations. To improve this, different decision support tools (DSTs) have been developed: online patient decision aids, consultation cards, and decision cards. This stepped wedge cluster randomised trial was conducted in 13 Dutch hospitals. Besides the developed DSTs, training on how to apply SDM during the clinician patient encounter was used in this study. Data were obtained via questionnaires and audio recordings. The primary outcome was the OPTION-5 score, an objective tool to assess the level of SDM, expressed as a percentage of exemplary performance. Main secondary outcomes were patients' disease specific knowledge, consultation duration, and treatment choice. Factors influencing OPTION-5 scores were studied using linear regression analysis. Included in the study were 342 patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA; n = 87), intermittent claudication (IC; n = 143), or varicose veins (VV; n = 112). Audiotapes of 395 consultations were analysed. Overall the mean OPTION-5 score significantly improved from 28.7% to 37.8% (mean difference 9.1%, 95% CI 6.5% - 11.8%) after implementation of the DSTs. Also, patient knowledge increased significantly (median increase: 13%, effect size: 0.13, p = .025). The number of patients choosing non-surgical treatment choices increased, with 21.4% to 28.8% for patients with AAA and doubled (16.0% to 32.0%) among patients with IC. For surgeons, the SDM training and for patients the decision aid significantly and independently increased OPTION-5 scores (p < .001 and p = .047, respectively). Introducing DSTs improves the level of shared decision making in vascular surgery, improves patient knowledge, and shifts their preference towards more non-surgical treatments. The SDM training for clinicians and the decision aid for patients appeared the most effective means of improving SDM. NTR6487.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35483576
pii: S1078-5884(22)00242-8
doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.04.016
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
73-81Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.