Ninety-day mortality following lung cancer surgery: outcomes from the English national clinical outcomes audit.


Journal

Thorax
ISSN: 1468-3296
Titre abrégé: Thorax
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0417353

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2022
Historique:
received: 04 10 2021
accepted: 11 03 2022
pubmed: 29 4 2022
medline: 18 6 2022
entrez: 28 4 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Accurately explaining perioperative mortality and risk to patients is an essential part of shared decision making. In the case of lung cancer surgery, the currently available multivariable mortality prediction tools perform poorly, and could mislead patients. Using data from 2004 to 2012, this group has previously produced data tables for 90-day postoperative mortality, to be used as a communication aid in the consenting process. Using National Lung Cancer Clinical Outcomes audit data from 2017 to 2018, we have produced updated early mortality tables, to reflect current thoracic surgery practice.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35483893
pii: thoraxjnl-2021-218308
doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-218308
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

724-726

Subventions

Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/T02481X/1
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: HM has nothing to disclose. DRB reports grants from Cancer Research UK, personal fees from Roche, personal fees from Astra Zeneca, personal fees from MSD, personal fees from BMS, outside the submitted work. RH reports personal fees from Galapagos, outside the submitted work. NN is supported by an MRC Clinical Academic Research Partnership (MR/T02481X/1). NN has received fees or non-financial support fromAmgen, Astra Zeneca, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Lilly & Co, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Olympus,Oncimmune, OncLive, PeerVoice, Pfizer and Takeda, outside of the submitted work. DWreports grants from Medtronic, personal fees from Astra Zeneca UK, and is a salariedemployee of the NHS England Improvement GIRFT programme. ELO'D has nothing to disclose.

Auteurs

Helen Morgan (H)

Division of Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK helen.morgan@nottingham.ac.uk.

David Baldwin (D)

Division of Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Respiratory Medicine, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.

Richard Hubbard (R)

Division of Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Neal Navani (N)

Lungs for Living Research Centre, UCL Respiratory, University College London, London, UK.

Doug West (D)

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.

Emma Louise O'Dowd (EL)

Division of Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Respiratory Medicine, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH