Investigating Heterogeneity and Neuroanatomic Correlates of Longitudinal Clinical Decline in Atypical Alzheimer Disease.
Journal
Neurology
ISSN: 1526-632X
Titre abrégé: Neurology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0401060
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Apr 2022
28 Apr 2022
Historique:
received:
29
06
2021
accepted:
21
02
2022
entrez:
28
4
2022
pubmed:
29
4
2022
medline:
29
4
2022
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
To compare rates of longitudinal change in neurological and neuropsychological test performance between the logopenic progressive aphasia (LPA) and posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) variants of atypical Alzheimer's disease (AD) and use unbiased principal component analysis to assess heterogeneity in patterns of change and relationships to demographics and concurrent brain atrophy. Patients with posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) or logogenic progressive aphasia (LPA) that were positive for amyloid and tau AD biomarkers and had undergone serial neurological and neuropsychological assessments and structural MRI were identified. Rates of change in 13 clinical measures were compared between groups in a case-control design, and principal component analysis was used to assess patterns of clinical change unbiased by clinical phenotype. Components were correlated with rates of regional brain atrophy using tensor-based morphometry. Twenty-eight PCA patients and 27 LPA patients were identified. LPA showed worse baseline performance and faster rates of decline in naming, repetition and working memory, as well as faster rates of decline in verbal episodic memory, compared to PCA. Conversely, PCA showed worse baseline performance in tests of visuospatial and perceptual function and on the Clinical dementia rating scale, and faster rates of decline in visuoperceptual function, compared to LPA. The principal component analysis showed that patterns of clinical decline were highly heterogeneous across the cohort, with 10 principal components required to explain over 90% of the variance. The first principal component reflected overall severity, with higher scores in LPA than PCA reflecting faster decline in LPA and was related to left temporoparietal atrophy. The second and third principal components were not related to clinical phenotype but showed some relationship to regional atrophy. No relationships were identified between the principal components and age, sex, disease duration, amyloid PET findings or apolipoprotein genotype. Longitudinal patterns of clinical decline differ between LPA and PCA but are heterogeneous and related to different patterns of topographic spread. PCA is associated with a more slowly progressive course than LPA.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35483899
pii: WNL.0000000000200336
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000200336
pmc: PMC9231842
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : P30 AG062677
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG050603
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG061796
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : U01 AG046139
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2022 American Academy of Neurology.
Références
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2001 Jul;103(2):115-9
pubmed: 11516556
Neurology. 2013 Jan 29;80(5):496-503
pubmed: 23359374
Dement Neuropsychol. 2007 Jul-Sep;1(3):311-319
pubmed: 29213406
J Neurosci. 2011 Mar 2;31(9):3344-50
pubmed: 21368046
JAMA Neurol. 2022 Jan 1;79(1):48-60
pubmed: 34870696
Neurol Sci. 2019 Dec;40(12):2573-2579
pubmed: 31332581
Neurology. 2014 May 6;82(18):1605-12
pubmed: 24706010
Ann Neurol. 2021 Mar;89(3):520-533
pubmed: 33274526
Brain. 2019 Jul 1;142(7):2082-2095
pubmed: 31219516
Alzheimers Dement. 2011 May;7(3):263-9
pubmed: 21514250
Neurocase. 2015 Feb;21(1):44-55
pubmed: 24308559
J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;69(3):849-855
pubmed: 31156165
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2017 Oct-Dec;31(4):295-306
pubmed: 28796011
Alzheimers Dement. 2017 Aug;13(8):870-884
pubmed: 28259709
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 23;8(4):e62471
pubmed: 23626825
Brain. 2019 Jun 1;142(6):1701-1722
pubmed: 31135048
Cortex. 2020 Nov;132:223-237
pubmed: 32998062
Brain Commun. 2020;2(1):fcaa068
pubmed: 32671341
Neurology. 2004 Oct 12;63(7):1168-74
pubmed: 15477533
Br J Psychiatry. 1982 Jun;140:566-72
pubmed: 7104545
Mov Disord. 2008 Nov 15;23(15):2129-70
pubmed: 19025984
Neurology. 2011 Mar 15;76(11):1006-14
pubmed: 21325651
Neurobiol Aging. 2015 Mar;36(3):1245-52
pubmed: 25592958
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9
pubmed: 15817019
J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;66(3):1015-1025
pubmed: 30372673
Brain Lang. 2013 Nov;127(2):139-44
pubmed: 23566690
J Neurol. 2021 May;268(5):1951-1961
pubmed: 33417000
Med Image Anal. 2008 Feb;12(1):26-41
pubmed: 17659998
Cortex. 2015 Oct;71:183-9
pubmed: 26232551
Brain. 2012 May;135(Pt 5):1522-36
pubmed: 22382356
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2019 Oct;41(8):875-880
pubmed: 31322045
Brain. 2020 Jul 1;143(7):2281-2294
pubmed: 32572464
Int J Epidemiol. 2000 Feb;29(1):158-67
pubmed: 10750618
Neurobiol Aging. 2007 Jul;28(7):1051-61
pubmed: 16797786
Dement Neuropsychol. 2008 Apr-Jun;2(2):102-107
pubmed: 29213551
Alzheimers Dement. 2017 Mar;13(3):205-216
pubmed: 27697430
Neuroimage Clin. 2015 Jan 22;8:345-55
pubmed: 26106560
Ann Neurol. 2004 Mar;55(3):335-46
pubmed: 14991811
Front Neurosci. 2017 Jun 14;11:330
pubmed: 28659753
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Jun;50(7):1708-18
pubmed: 22484080
Alzheimers Dement. 2020 Jul;16(7):965-973
pubmed: 32489019
J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;62(4):1713-1724
pubmed: 29614676