Determinants of technology adoption and continued use among cognitively impaired older adults: a qualitative study.
Cognitive impairment
Dementia
Focus group
Informal caregivers
Interviews
Mci
Professional caregivers
Thematic analysis
Journal
BMC geriatrics
ISSN: 1471-2318
Titre abrégé: BMC Geriatr
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968548
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 04 2022
28 04 2022
Historique:
received:
13
09
2021
accepted:
08
04
2022
entrez:
28
4
2022
pubmed:
29
4
2022
medline:
3
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Technology offers opportunities to support older adults with mild cognitive impairments to remain independent and socially connected, but is often not used. Although determinants of technology use among older adults in general are well studied, much less is known about how these factors impact technology use behaviour in cognitively impaired older adults. This study aimed to bridge this gap in research by examining the factors underlying technology use in community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairments. We applied a generic qualitative design and used 16 semi-structured interviews to collect data from Belgian (Flemish) community-dwelling older adults diagnosed with Mild Cognitive Impairment or dementia and informal caregivers. To get data from different perspectives, a focus group with professional caregivers was added. We used thematic analysis with an inductive approach to identify and select themes from the data. We identified two themes: introduction of technology and determinants of technology adoption and continued use. Successful technology adoption in cognitively impaired older adults is need-driven and subject to individual, technological and contextual characteristics. Specific for older adults with cognitive impairments are the importance of disease awareness and cognitive ability for adoption and continued use, respectively. Although social support can be a valuable alternative to technology, it is an important facilitator of continued technology use in these older adults. Similarly, integration of technologies in daily routines can buffer discontinuation of technologies. Future research is encouraged to validate our findings in a postpandemic era and to further develop a novel theoretical framework for technology acceptance among older adults with cognitive impairments. Moreover, identification of crucial determinants as well as strategies to remove use barriers are also important future research tasks. Clinical practice should focus on improving disease awareness to facilitate technology adoption and policies should invest in training and support of professional caregivers and in reimbursement strategies to facilitate implementation of technology in practice.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Technology offers opportunities to support older adults with mild cognitive impairments to remain independent and socially connected, but is often not used. Although determinants of technology use among older adults in general are well studied, much less is known about how these factors impact technology use behaviour in cognitively impaired older adults. This study aimed to bridge this gap in research by examining the factors underlying technology use in community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairments.
METHODS
We applied a generic qualitative design and used 16 semi-structured interviews to collect data from Belgian (Flemish) community-dwelling older adults diagnosed with Mild Cognitive Impairment or dementia and informal caregivers. To get data from different perspectives, a focus group with professional caregivers was added. We used thematic analysis with an inductive approach to identify and select themes from the data.
RESULTS
We identified two themes: introduction of technology and determinants of technology adoption and continued use. Successful technology adoption in cognitively impaired older adults is need-driven and subject to individual, technological and contextual characteristics. Specific for older adults with cognitive impairments are the importance of disease awareness and cognitive ability for adoption and continued use, respectively. Although social support can be a valuable alternative to technology, it is an important facilitator of continued technology use in these older adults. Similarly, integration of technologies in daily routines can buffer discontinuation of technologies.
CONCLUSIONS
Future research is encouraged to validate our findings in a postpandemic era and to further develop a novel theoretical framework for technology acceptance among older adults with cognitive impairments. Moreover, identification of crucial determinants as well as strategies to remove use barriers are also important future research tasks. Clinical practice should focus on improving disease awareness to facilitate technology adoption and policies should invest in training and support of professional caregivers and in reimbursement strategies to facilitate implementation of technology in practice.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35484488
doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03048-w
pii: 10.1186/s12877-022-03048-w
pmc: PMC9047390
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
376Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 4;22(6):e17930
pubmed: 32496197
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Feb 14;19(2):e29
pubmed: 28196791
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Oct 25;19(10):e358
pubmed: 29070481
Gerontology. 2016;62(2):226-37
pubmed: 26044243
J Med Internet Res. 2017 May 24;19(5):e180
pubmed: 28539302
Ageing Res Rev. 2007 Oct;6(3):223-46
pubmed: 17869590
J Appl Gerontol. 2020 Feb;39(2):141-150
pubmed: 30353776
Clin Interv Aging. 2018 May 04;13:863-886
pubmed: 29765211
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jan 11;19(1):26
pubmed: 30634971
J Med Internet Res. 2005 Mar 31;7(1):e9
pubmed: 15829481
J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;56(4):1301-1340
pubmed: 28222516
Health Informatics J. 2015 Sep;21(3):237-49
pubmed: 24567416
Curr Geriatr Rep. 2020 Jun;9(2):72-81
pubmed: 32509504
J Med Internet Res. 2013 May 16;15(5):e97
pubmed: 23681083
J Clin Nurs. 2010 Jul;19(13-14):1935-43
pubmed: 20920020
Eur J Ageing. 2008 Jul 1;5(3):233
pubmed: 28798575
Eur J Ageing. 2020 Mar 10;17(3):271-280
pubmed: 32904732
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Aug 22;17(1):189
pubmed: 28830444
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2015 Oct;21(9):688-98
pubmed: 26391766
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2014 Sep;69(5):667-77
pubmed: 24304556
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2004;17(3):181-7
pubmed: 14739542
Alzheimers Dement. 2013 Jan;9(1):63-75.e2
pubmed: 23305823
Health Informatics J. 2013 Jun;19(2):152-62
pubmed: 23715214
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Aug 28;19(1):236
pubmed: 31462214
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Mar 6;2019:9196729
pubmed: 30956989
Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 3;9(1):128
pubmed: 32493515
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Sep;129:324-333
pubmed: 31445274
Int J Med Inform. 2014 Apr;83(4):235-48
pubmed: 24529817
J Clin Epidemiol. 2002 May;55(5):462-8
pubmed: 12007549
JMIR Aging. 2021 Apr 23;4(2):e28010
pubmed: 33739929
Gerontologist. 2021 Sep 13;61(7):e373-e394
pubmed: 32525977
Geriatr Nurs. 2018 Jan - Feb;39(1):29-38
pubmed: 28624128
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 1;22(6):e17253
pubmed: 32442136