Minimum acceptable diet feeding practice and associated factors among children aged 6-23 months in east Africa: a multilevel binary logistic regression analysis of 2008-2018 demographic health survey data.
Children
East Africa
Minimum acceptable diet
Multilevel analysis
Journal
Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique
ISSN: 0778-7367
Titre abrégé: Arch Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9208826
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Apr 2022
28 Apr 2022
Historique:
received:
30
06
2021
accepted:
12
04
2022
entrez:
28
4
2022
pubmed:
29
4
2022
medline:
29
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Despite the proportion of receiving a minimum acceptable diet (minimum meal frequency and minimum dietary diversity) is lower in east Africa, there is limited evidence on minimum acceptable diet. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the minimum acceptable diet and associated factors among children aged 6-23 months in east Africa. A secondary data analysis of the most recent Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data of 12 east African countries was done. A total weighted sample of 34, 097 children aged 6-23 months were included. A multilevel binary logistic regression model was applied. The Intra-class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and Median Odds Ratio (MOR) were calculated to assess the clustering effect. Besides, deviance was used for model comparison as the models are nested models. Both crude and adjusted Odds Ratio (OR) with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) were reported as potential predictors of minimum acceptable diet feeding practice. The prevalence of minimum acceptable diet feeding practice among children in east Africa was 11.56%; [95%CI; 11.22%, 11.90%]. In the multilevel analysis; child age of 12-17 month (AOR = 1.33: 95%CI; 1.20, 1.48), maternal primary (AOR = 1.21: 95%CI; 1.08, 1.35), secondary (AOR = 1.63: 95%CI; 1.44, 1.86) higher (AOR = 2.97: 95%CI; 2.30, 3.38) education level, media exposure (AOR = 1.38, 95%CI; 1.26, 1.51), household wealth statues (AOR = 1.28, 95%CI; 1.15, 1.42 for middle and AOR = 1.50: 95%CI; 1.42, 1.71 foe rich), employed mother (AOR = 1.27: 95%CI; 1.17, 1.37), maternal age 25-34 (AOR = 1.20: 95%CI; 1.09, 1.32) and 35-49 (AOR = 1.22: 95%; 1.06, 1.40) years, delivery in health facility (AOR = 1.43: 95%CI; 1.29, 1.59) and high community education level (AOR = 1.05: 95%CI; 1.01, 1.17) were positively associated with minimum acceptable diet child feeding practice. Meanwhile, the use of wood (AOR = 0.72: 95%CI; 0.61, 0.86) and animal dug (AOR = 0.34: 95%CI; 0.12, 0.95) as a source of cooking fuel and being from female-headed households (AOR = 0.88: 95%CI; 0.81, 0.96) were negatively associated with minimum acceptable diet feeding practice. Child age, mother's educational level, source of cooking fuel, exposure to media, sex of household head, household wealth status, mother working status, age of the mother, place of delivery and community-level education were the significant determinants of minimum acceptable diet feeding practices. Therefore, designing public health interventions targeting higher-risk children such as those from the poorest household and strengthening mothers' education on acceptable child feed practices are recommended.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Despite the proportion of receiving a minimum acceptable diet (minimum meal frequency and minimum dietary diversity) is lower in east Africa, there is limited evidence on minimum acceptable diet. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the minimum acceptable diet and associated factors among children aged 6-23 months in east Africa.
METHODS
METHODS
A secondary data analysis of the most recent Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data of 12 east African countries was done. A total weighted sample of 34, 097 children aged 6-23 months were included. A multilevel binary logistic regression model was applied. The Intra-class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and Median Odds Ratio (MOR) were calculated to assess the clustering effect. Besides, deviance was used for model comparison as the models are nested models. Both crude and adjusted Odds Ratio (OR) with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) were reported as potential predictors of minimum acceptable diet feeding practice.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The prevalence of minimum acceptable diet feeding practice among children in east Africa was 11.56%; [95%CI; 11.22%, 11.90%]. In the multilevel analysis; child age of 12-17 month (AOR = 1.33: 95%CI; 1.20, 1.48), maternal primary (AOR = 1.21: 95%CI; 1.08, 1.35), secondary (AOR = 1.63: 95%CI; 1.44, 1.86) higher (AOR = 2.97: 95%CI; 2.30, 3.38) education level, media exposure (AOR = 1.38, 95%CI; 1.26, 1.51), household wealth statues (AOR = 1.28, 95%CI; 1.15, 1.42 for middle and AOR = 1.50: 95%CI; 1.42, 1.71 foe rich), employed mother (AOR = 1.27: 95%CI; 1.17, 1.37), maternal age 25-34 (AOR = 1.20: 95%CI; 1.09, 1.32) and 35-49 (AOR = 1.22: 95%; 1.06, 1.40) years, delivery in health facility (AOR = 1.43: 95%CI; 1.29, 1.59) and high community education level (AOR = 1.05: 95%CI; 1.01, 1.17) were positively associated with minimum acceptable diet child feeding practice. Meanwhile, the use of wood (AOR = 0.72: 95%CI; 0.61, 0.86) and animal dug (AOR = 0.34: 95%CI; 0.12, 0.95) as a source of cooking fuel and being from female-headed households (AOR = 0.88: 95%CI; 0.81, 0.96) were negatively associated with minimum acceptable diet feeding practice.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Child age, mother's educational level, source of cooking fuel, exposure to media, sex of household head, household wealth status, mother working status, age of the mother, place of delivery and community-level education were the significant determinants of minimum acceptable diet feeding practices. Therefore, designing public health interventions targeting higher-risk children such as those from the poorest household and strengthening mothers' education on acceptable child feed practices are recommended.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35484576
doi: 10.1186/s13690-022-00882-7
pii: 10.1186/s13690-022-00882-7
pmc: PMC9047376
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
127Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Public Health Nutr. 2012 May;15(5):827-39
pubmed: 22014663
J Health Popul Nutr. 2015 May 01;34:6
pubmed: 26825452
Public Health Nutr. 2015 Mar;18(4):669-78
pubmed: 24844532
Lancet. 2008 Jan 19;371(9608):243-60
pubmed: 18207566
Trop Med Health. 2018 Nov 20;46:40
pubmed: 30479557
Matern Child Nutr. 2012 Jan;8 Suppl 1:60-77
pubmed: 22168519
Glob Health Action. 2013 Feb 05;6:20100
pubmed: 23394856
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 13;12(2):e0171792
pubmed: 28192518
Trop Med Health. 2018 Jan 30;46:2
pubmed: 29422772
BMJ Open. 2015 Oct 06;5(10):e008467
pubmed: 26443657
Matern Child Nutr. 2020 Apr;16(2):e12926
pubmed: 31833239
Matern Child Nutr. 2012 Jan;8 Suppl 1:28-44
pubmed: 22168517
PLoS One. 2010 Jun 23;5(6):e11190
pubmed: 20585646
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2018;27(6):1302-1314
pubmed: 30485930
BMC Public Health. 2019 Aug 1;19(1):1034
pubmed: 31370827
Pediatrics. 2011 Dec;128(6):e1418-27
pubmed: 22065267
HIV AIDS (Auckl). 2020 Oct 28;12:639-645
pubmed: 33149697
Heliyon. 2019 Jul 02;5(7):e01865
pubmed: 31317077
Indian J Pediatr. 2008 Jan;75(1):49-53
pubmed: 18245935
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 21;14(2):e0203098
pubmed: 30789922
Matern Child Nutr. 2015 Oct;11 Suppl 1:31-52
pubmed: 26364790
BMC Pediatr. 2018 Sep 25;18(1):310
pubmed: 30253771