Three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of frontal recess cells according to the International Frontal Sinus Anatomy Classification (IFAC) - difficulties in identification of frontal recess cells in patients with diffuse primary chronic rhinosinusitis?
IFAC
frontal recess
radiology
sinus anatomy
sinus surgery
Journal
Otolaryngologia polska = The Polish otolaryngology
ISSN: 2300-8423
Titre abrégé: Otolaryngol Pol
Pays: Poland
ID NLM: 0404453
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Jan 2022
14 Jan 2022
Historique:
entrez:
29
4
2022
pubmed:
30
4
2022
medline:
3
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
<br><b>Introduction:</b>The International Frontal Sinus Anatomy Classification (IFAC) is a consensus document created to standardize and specify the naming of cells within the region of the frontal recess and frontal sinus.</br> <br><b>Aim:</b> The aim of this study was to analyze the difficulties in identifying cells according to the IFAC in patients with diffuse primary chronic rhinosinusitis.</br> <br><b>Material and methods:</b> Three independent reviewers examined triplanar computed tomography (CT) scans to assess the anatomy of the frontal recess using the IFAC system. CT scans were chosen randomly and divided into 3 groups: CT scans of patients not presenting sinus complaints (control group), CT scans of patients affected by diffuse primary chronic rhinosinusitis non-type 2, and CT scans of patients affected by diffuse primary chronic rhinosinusitis type 2.</br> <br><b>Results:</b> Identification of all frontal cell types was accurate in patients not presenting sinus complaints (P-value < 0.05). Patients scoring 9 or more points in the Lund-Mackay scoring system demonstrated a statistically increased risk of improper identification of frontal recess cells (P-value < 0.0001).</br> <br><b>Conclusions:</b> Due to a large number of possible anatomical variants and changes caused by the chronic inflammatory disease, the IFAC nomenclatura is easier to apply to non-type 2 primary diffuse CRS patients with low scores in the L-M score scale than to primary diffuse type 2 CRS patients with higher M-L scores.</br>.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35485224
doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0015.6959
pii: 01.3001.0015.6959
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM