The Architecture of a Feasibility Query Portal for Distributed COVID-19 Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) Patient Data Repositories: Design and Implementation Study.
COVID-19
CQL
FHIR
FHIR Search
Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources
HL7 FHIR
consensus data set
distributed analysis
feasibility study
federated feasibility queries
health data
medical informatics
pandemic
patient data
query
Journal
JMIR medical informatics
ISSN: 2291-9694
Titre abrégé: JMIR Med Inform
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101645109
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 May 2022
25 May 2022
Historique:
received:
24
01
2022
accepted:
11
04
2022
revised:
16
03
2022
pubmed:
30
4
2022
medline:
30
4
2022
entrez:
29
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
An essential step in any medical research project after identifying the research question is to determine if there are sufficient patients available for a study and where to find them. Pursuing digital feasibility queries on available patient data registries has proven to be an excellent way of reusing existing real-world data sources. To support multicentric research, these feasibility queries should be designed and implemented to run across multiple sites and securely access local data. Working across hospitals usually involves working with different data formats and vocabularies. Recently, the Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) standard was developed by Health Level Seven to address this concern and describe patient data in a standardized format. The Medical Informatics Initiative in Germany has committed to this standard and created data integration centers, which convert existing data into the FHIR format at each hospital. This partially solves the interoperability problem; however, a distributed feasibility query platform for the FHIR standard is still missing. This study described the design and implementation of the components involved in creating a cross-hospital feasibility query platform for researchers based on FHIR resources. This effort was part of a large COVID-19 data exchange platform and was designed to be scalable for a broad range of patient data. We analyzed and designed the abstract components necessary for a distributed feasibility query. This included a user interface for creating the query, backend with an ontology and terminology service, middleware for query distribution, and FHIR feasibility query execution service. We implemented the components described in the Methods section. The resulting solution was distributed to 33 German university hospitals. The functionality of the comprehensive network infrastructure was demonstrated using a test data set based on the German Corona Consensus Data Set. A performance test using specifically created synthetic data revealed the applicability of our solution to data sets containing millions of FHIR resources. The solution can be easily deployed across hospitals and supports feasibility queries, combining multiple inclusion and exclusion criteria using standard Health Level Seven query languages such as Clinical Quality Language and FHIR Search. Developing a platform based on multiple microservices allowed us to create an extendable platform and support multiple Health Level Seven query languages and middleware components to allow integration with future directions of the Medical Informatics Initiative. We designed and implemented a feasibility platform for distributed feasibility queries, which works directly on FHIR-formatted data and distributed it across 33 university hospitals in Germany. We showed that developing a feasibility platform directly on the FHIR standard is feasible.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
An essential step in any medical research project after identifying the research question is to determine if there are sufficient patients available for a study and where to find them. Pursuing digital feasibility queries on available patient data registries has proven to be an excellent way of reusing existing real-world data sources. To support multicentric research, these feasibility queries should be designed and implemented to run across multiple sites and securely access local data. Working across hospitals usually involves working with different data formats and vocabularies. Recently, the Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) standard was developed by Health Level Seven to address this concern and describe patient data in a standardized format. The Medical Informatics Initiative in Germany has committed to this standard and created data integration centers, which convert existing data into the FHIR format at each hospital. This partially solves the interoperability problem; however, a distributed feasibility query platform for the FHIR standard is still missing.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
This study described the design and implementation of the components involved in creating a cross-hospital feasibility query platform for researchers based on FHIR resources. This effort was part of a large COVID-19 data exchange platform and was designed to be scalable for a broad range of patient data.
METHODS
METHODS
We analyzed and designed the abstract components necessary for a distributed feasibility query. This included a user interface for creating the query, backend with an ontology and terminology service, middleware for query distribution, and FHIR feasibility query execution service.
RESULTS
RESULTS
We implemented the components described in the Methods section. The resulting solution was distributed to 33 German university hospitals. The functionality of the comprehensive network infrastructure was demonstrated using a test data set based on the German Corona Consensus Data Set. A performance test using specifically created synthetic data revealed the applicability of our solution to data sets containing millions of FHIR resources. The solution can be easily deployed across hospitals and supports feasibility queries, combining multiple inclusion and exclusion criteria using standard Health Level Seven query languages such as Clinical Quality Language and FHIR Search. Developing a platform based on multiple microservices allowed us to create an extendable platform and support multiple Health Level Seven query languages and middleware components to allow integration with future directions of the Medical Informatics Initiative.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
We designed and implemented a feasibility platform for distributed feasibility queries, which works directly on FHIR-formatted data and distributed it across 33 university hospitals in Germany. We showed that developing a feasibility platform directly on the FHIR standard is feasible.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35486893
pii: v10i5e36709
doi: 10.2196/36709
pmc: PMC9135115
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e36709Informations de copyright
©Julian Gruendner, Noemi Deppenwiese, Michael Folz, Thomas Köhler, Björn Kroll, Hans-Ulrich Prokosch, Lorenz Rosenau, Mathias Rühle, Marc-Anton Scheidl, Christina Schüttler, Brita Sedlmayr, Alexander Twrdik, Alexander Kiel, Raphael W Majeed. Originally published in JMIR Medical Informatics (https://medinform.jmir.org), 25.05.2022.
Références
Appl Clin Inform. 2021 May;12(3):495-506
pubmed: 34192772
J Biomed Inform. 2021 Dec;124:103953
pubmed: 34781009
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Aug 21;264:724-728
pubmed: 31438019
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019;258:146-150
pubmed: 30942733
Mol Oncol. 2019 Mar;13(3):535-542
pubmed: 30561127
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Sep-Oct;16(5):624-30
pubmed: 19567788
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 May 25;294:674-678
pubmed: 35612174
Int J Epidemiol. 2014 Dec;43(6):1929-44
pubmed: 25261970
Methods Inf Med. 2018 Jul;57(S 01):e57-e65
pubmed: 30016812
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Sep;5(9):
pubmed: 32994228
Methods Inf Med. 2018 Jul;57(S 01):e92-e105
pubmed: 30016815
Methods Inf Med. 2018 Jul;57(S 01):e82-e91
pubmed: 30016814
Methods Inf Med. 2018 Jul;57(S 01):e50-e56
pubmed: 30016818
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 22;16(9):e0257632
pubmed: 34551019
Appl Clin Inform. 2018 Jan;9(1):54-61
pubmed: 29365340
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020 Dec 18;21:100692
pubmed: 33409423
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021 May 24;278:126-133
pubmed: 34042885
Biopreserv Biobank. 2020 Apr;18(2):64-72
pubmed: 31859533
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Mar 30;17(3):e1008880
pubmed: 33784300
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2020 Jun 16;270:158-162
pubmed: 32570366
Methods Inf Med. 2014;53(4):264-8
pubmed: 24954881
Appl Clin Inform. 2022 Mar;13(2):400-409
pubmed: 35445386
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Mar 1;28(3):638-639
pubmed: 33275146
Summit Transl Bioinform. 2010 Mar 01;2010:46-50
pubmed: 21347148
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2018;253:3-7
pubmed: 30147028
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Dec 21;20(1):341
pubmed: 33349259
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2022 Feb;117(1):24-33
pubmed: 33346852
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 May 16;292:37-42
pubmed: 35575846
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2018 May 18;2017:369-378
pubmed: 29888095
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Apr 27;10(4):e35789
pubmed: 35380548
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;212:88-93
pubmed: 26063262
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019;258:115-119
pubmed: 30942726
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021 May 24;278:134-141
pubmed: 34042886
Methods Inf Med. 2018 Jul;57(S 01):e66-e81
pubmed: 30016813
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Apr 1;9(4):e25645
pubmed: 33792554
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Jul 21;9(7):e25531
pubmed: 34287211