Cross-sectional characteristics of pediatric-onset discoid lupus erythematosus: Results of a multicenter, retrospective cohort study.
discoid lupus erythematosus
pediatric
pediatric dermatology
pediatric rheumatology
systemic lupus erythematosus
Journal
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
ISSN: 1097-6787
Titre abrégé: J Am Acad Dermatol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7907132
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2022
09 2022
Historique:
received:
06
11
2021
revised:
07
04
2022
accepted:
08
04
2022
pubmed:
30
4
2022
medline:
24
8
2022
entrez:
29
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The incidence of systemic lupus in children with discoid lupus is unknown. This study assessed the baseline characteristics of patients with pediatric discoid lupus erythematosus (pDLE). Medical records at 17 sites were reviewed for pediatric dermatology and rheumatology patients with discoid lupus erythematosus. The inclusion criteria were clinical and/or histopathologic diagnosis of discoid lupus erythematosus with an age at onset of <18 years. Baseline data were collected at the first documented visit. Outcomes included diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) at the baseline visit using the 1997 American College of Rheumatology (primary) and the 2012 Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (secondary) criteria. Of the >1500 charts reviewed, 438 patients met the inclusion criteria. The cohort was predominantly female (72%) and racially/ethnically diverse. A diagnosis of SLE at the baseline visit (pDLE + SLE) was rendered in 162 (37%) patients using the American College of Rheumatology and in 181 (41%) patients using the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics criteria. Patients with pDLE + SLE were older at the time of rash onset (median, 12.9 vs 8.9 years; P < .001), with shorter time from discoid lupus erythematosus onset to diagnosis, compared with patients with pDLE-only (median, 2 vs 7 months; P < .001). Patients with pDLE + SLE were more likely to be female (P = .004), with generalized discoid lupus erythematosus and clinically aggressive disease, including end-organ involvement, positive serologies, and higher- titer levels of antinuclear antibodies (P < .001). Retrospective study. A diagnosis of discoid lupus erythematosus in adolescence should prompt thorough screening for SLE.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The incidence of systemic lupus in children with discoid lupus is unknown.
OBJECTIVE
This study assessed the baseline characteristics of patients with pediatric discoid lupus erythematosus (pDLE).
METHODS
Medical records at 17 sites were reviewed for pediatric dermatology and rheumatology patients with discoid lupus erythematosus. The inclusion criteria were clinical and/or histopathologic diagnosis of discoid lupus erythematosus with an age at onset of <18 years. Baseline data were collected at the first documented visit. Outcomes included diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) at the baseline visit using the 1997 American College of Rheumatology (primary) and the 2012 Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (secondary) criteria.
RESULTS
Of the >1500 charts reviewed, 438 patients met the inclusion criteria. The cohort was predominantly female (72%) and racially/ethnically diverse. A diagnosis of SLE at the baseline visit (pDLE + SLE) was rendered in 162 (37%) patients using the American College of Rheumatology and in 181 (41%) patients using the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics criteria. Patients with pDLE + SLE were older at the time of rash onset (median, 12.9 vs 8.9 years; P < .001), with shorter time from discoid lupus erythematosus onset to diagnosis, compared with patients with pDLE-only (median, 2 vs 7 months; P < .001). Patients with pDLE + SLE were more likely to be female (P = .004), with generalized discoid lupus erythematosus and clinically aggressive disease, including end-organ involvement, positive serologies, and higher- titer levels of antinuclear antibodies (P < .001).
LIMITATIONS
Retrospective study.
CONCLUSION
A diagnosis of discoid lupus erythematosus in adolescence should prompt thorough screening for SLE.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35487332
pii: S0190-9622(22)00694-6
doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2022.04.028
pmc: PMC10082546
mid: NIHMS1845732
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
559-566Subventions
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR002373
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of interest Dr Ardoin is a consultant for Aurinia. Dr Chong is an investigator for Daavlin Corporation, Pfizer Incorporated, Biogen Incorporated, and Amgen Incorporated; is a consultant for Viela Bio, Beacon Bioscience, Bristol Meyers Squibb, EMD Serono, and Principia Biopharma; reports research grants (paid to his institution) from Daavlin Corporation and Biogen Incorporated; reports honoraria from Viela Bio, Beacon Bioscience, Bristol Meyers Squibb, EMD Serono, and Principia Biopharma as a consultant. Dr von Scheven is the President of the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Alliance. Drs Ezeh, Ardalan, Buhr, Nguyen, Ahmed, Barton, Bell, Brandling-Bennett, Castelo-Soccio, Chiu, Co, Lara-Corrales, Cinosun, Curran, Diaz, Elman, Fernandez-Faith, Garcia-Romero, Grossman-Kranseler, Hogeling, Hudson, Hunt, Ibler, Marques, Monir, Oza, Paller, Putterman, Rodriguez-Salgado, Schoch, Truong, Wang, Wine Lee, Vleugels, Klein-Gitelman, Werth, and Arkin have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Références
Br J Dermatol. 2013 Aug;169(2):428-33
pubmed: 23601021
Br J Dermatol. 2019 Oct;181(4):805-810
pubmed: 30768778
Br J Dermatol. 2011 Jun;164(6):1335-41
pubmed: 21574972
Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Aug;64(8):2677-86
pubmed: 22553077
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2005 Jun;30(3):315-7
pubmed: 16045022
Arthritis Rheum. 1997 Sep;40(9):1725
pubmed: 9324032
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2019 Nov;71(11):1404-1409
pubmed: 31058462
Lupus. 2008 Apr;17(4):314-22
pubmed: 18413413
Lupus. 2010 Jan;19(1):52-7
pubmed: 19910391
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 Sep;71(9):1534-1538
pubmed: 31385442
Pediatr Dermatol. 2008 Mar-Apr;25(2):163-7
pubmed: 18429771
Lupus. 2020 Apr;29(5):474-481
pubmed: 32233733
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Mar;70(3):420-427
pubmed: 28544820
Iran J Immunol. 2007 Jun;4(2):110-5
pubmed: 17652851
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015 May;67(6):817-28
pubmed: 25369985
Arch Dermatol. 1993 May;129(5):613-7
pubmed: 8481023
Clin Rheumatol. 2002 Nov;21(6):462-5
pubmed: 12447628
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1994 Sep-Oct;12 Suppl 10:S63-8
pubmed: 7955630
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015 Apr;72(4):628-33
pubmed: 25648823
Lupus Sci Med. 2019 Oct 30;6(1):e000344
pubmed: 31798917
J Rheumatol. 2021 Jun;48(6):915-923
pubmed: 32739896
Arch Dermatol. 2009 Mar;145(3):249-53
pubmed: 19289752
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011 May;64(5):849-58
pubmed: 21397983
JAMA Dermatol. 2014 Mar;150(3):291-6
pubmed: 24477339
Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Jul;64(7):2356-65
pubmed: 22294381