Deciphering the acetylation code of p53 in transcription regulation and tumor suppression.


Journal

Oncogene
ISSN: 1476-5594
Titre abrégé: Oncogene
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8711562

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 2022
Historique:
received: 03 03 2022
accepted: 20 04 2022
revised: 14 04 2022
pubmed: 30 4 2022
medline: 31 5 2022
entrez: 29 4 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Although it is well-established that p53-mediated tumor suppression mainly acts through its ability in transcriptional regulation, the molecular mechanisms of this regulation are not completely understood. Among a number of regulatory modes, acetylation of p53 attracts great interests. p53 was one of the first non-histone proteins found to be functionally regulated by acetylation and deacetylation, and subsequent work has established that reversible acetylation is a general mechanism for regulation of non-histone proteins. Unlike other types of posttranslational modifications occurred during stress responses, the role of p53 acetylation has been recently validated in vivo by using the knock-in mice with both acetylation-defective and acetylation-mimicking p53 mutants. Here, we review the role of acetylation in p53-mediated activities, with a focus on which specific acetylation sites are critical for p53-dependent transcription regulation during tumor suppression and how acetylation of p53 recruits specific "readers" to execute its promoter-specific regulation of different targets. We also discuss the role of p53 acetylation in differentially regulating its classic activities in cell cycle arrest, senescence and apoptosis as well as newly identified unconventional functions such as cell metabolism and ferroptosis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35487975
doi: 10.1038/s41388-022-02331-9
pii: 10.1038/s41388-022-02331-9
pmc: PMC9149126
mid: NIHMS1800386
doi:

Substances chimiques

Trp53 protein, mouse 0
Tumor Suppressor Protein p53 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

3039-3050

Subventions

Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA254970
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA258390
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R35 CA253059
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

Références

Boutelle AM, Attardi LD. p53 and tumor suppression: it takes a network. Trends Cell Biol. 2021;31:298–310.
pubmed: 33518400 pmcid: 7954925 doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2020.12.011
Mello SS, Attardi LD. Deciphering p53 signaling in tumor suppression. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2018;51:65–72.
pubmed: 29195118 doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2017.11.005
Kaiser AM, Attardi LD. Deconstructing networks of p53-mediated tumor suppression in vivo. Cell Death Differ. 2018;25:93–103.
pubmed: 29099489 doi: 10.1038/cdd.2017.171
Liu Y, Tavana O, Gu W. p53 modifications: exquisite decorations of the powerful guardian. J Mol Cell Biol. 2019;11:564–77.
pubmed: 31282934 pmcid: 6736412 doi: 10.1093/jmcb/mjz060
Gu W, Roeder RG. Activation of p53 sequence-specific DNA binding by acetylation of the p53 C-terminal domain. Cell. 1997;90:595–606.
pubmed: 9288740 doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80521-8
Tang Y, Zhao W, Chen Y, Zhao Y, Gu W. Acetylation is indispensable for p53 activation. Cell. 2008;133:612–26.
pubmed: 18485870 pmcid: 2914560 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.03.025
Barnoud T, Indeglia A, Murphy ME. Shifting the paradigms for tumor suppression: lessons from the p53 field. Oncogene. 2021;40:4281–90.
pubmed: 34103683 pmcid: 8238873 doi: 10.1038/s41388-021-01852-z
Reed SM, Quelle DE. p53 acetylation: regulation and consequences. Cancers. 2014;7:30–69.
pubmed: 25545885 pmcid: 4381250 doi: 10.3390/cancers7010030
Wen J, Wang D. Deciphering the PTM codes of the tumor suppressor p53. J Mol Cell Biol. 2022;13:774–85.
Allfrey VG, Faulkner R, Mirsky AE. Acetylation and methylation of histones and their possible role in the regulation of Rna synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1964;51:786–94.
pubmed: 14172992 pmcid: 300163 doi: 10.1073/pnas.51.5.786
Nitsch S, Zorro Shahidian L, Schneider R. Histone acylations and chromatin dynamics: concepts, challenges, and links to metabolism. EMBO Rep. 2021;22:e52774.
pubmed: 34159701 pmcid: 8406397 doi: 10.15252/embr.202152774
Sterner R, Vidali G, Allfrey VG. Studies of acetylation and deacetylation in high mobility group proteins. Identification of the sites of acetylation in HMG-1. J Biol Chem. 1979;254:11577–83.
pubmed: 500660 doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)86524-9
L’Hernault SW, Rosenbaum JL. Chlamydomonas alpha-tubulin is posttranslationally modified by acetylation on the epsilon-amino group of a lysine. Biochemistry. 1985;24:473–8.
pubmed: 3919761 doi: 10.1021/bi00323a034
Gu W, Shi XL, Roeder RG. Synergistic activation of transcription by CBP and p53. Nature. 1997;387:819–23.
pubmed: 9194564 doi: 10.1038/42972
Tang Y, Luo J, Zhang W, Gu W. Tip60-dependent acetylation of p53 modulates the decision between cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis. Mol Cell. 2006;24:827–39.
pubmed: 17189186 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.11.021
Li T, Kon N, Jiang L, Tan M, Ludwig T, Zhao Y, et al. Tumor suppression in the absence of p53-mediated cell-cycle arrest, apoptosis, and senescence. Cell. 2012;149:1269–83.
pubmed: 22682249 pmcid: 3688046 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.026
Jiang L, Kon N, Li T, Wang SJ, Su T, Hibshoosh H, et al. Ferroptosis as a p53-mediated activity during tumour suppression. Nature. 2015;520:57–62.
pubmed: 25799988 pmcid: 4455927 doi: 10.1038/nature14344
Wang SJ, Li D, Ou Y, Jiang L, Chen Y, Zhao Y, et al. Acetylation is crucial for p53-mediated ferroptosis and tumor suppression. Cell Rep. 2016;17:366–73.
pubmed: 27705786 pmcid: 5227654 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.09.022
Kon N, Ou Y, Wang SJ, Li H, Rustgi AK, Gu W. Corrigendum: mTOR inhibition acts as an unexpected checkpoint in p53-mediated tumor suppression. Genes Dev. 2021;35:300.
pubmed: 33526587 pmcid: 7849359 doi: 10.1101/gad.348236.121
Wang D, Kon N, Lasso G, Jiang L, Leng W, Zhu WG, et al. Acetylation-regulated interaction between p53 and SET reveals a widespread regulatory mode. Nature. 2016;538:118–22.
pubmed: 27626385 pmcid: 5333498 doi: 10.1038/nature19759
Wang D, Kon N, Tavana O, Gu W. The “readers” of unacetylated p53 represent a new class of acidic domain proteins. Nucleus. 2017;8:360–9.
pubmed: 28406743 pmcid: 5597292 doi: 10.1080/19491034.2017.1313939
Yang X, Wang X, Li Z, Duan S, Li H, Jin J, et al. An unexpected role for Dicer as a reader of the unacetylated DNA binding domain of p53 in transcriptional regulation. Sci Adv. 2021;7:eabi6684.
pubmed: 34705508 pmcid: 8550248 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abi6684
Choudhary C, Kumar C, Gnad F, Nielsen ML, Rehman M, Walther TC, et al. Lysine acetylation targets protein complexes and co-regulates major cellular functions. Science. 2009;325:834–40.
pubmed: 19608861 doi: 10.1126/science.1175371
Narita T, Weinert BT, Choudhary C. Functions and mechanisms of non-histone protein acetylation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2019;20:156–74.
pubmed: 30467427 doi: 10.1038/s41580-018-0081-3
Verdin E, Ott M. 50 years of protein acetylation: from gene regulation to epigenetics, metabolism and beyond. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2015;16:258–64.
pubmed: 25549891 doi: 10.1038/nrm3931
Joerger AC, Fersht AR. The p53 pathway: origins, inactivation in cancer, and emerging therapeutic approaches. Annu Rev Biochem. 2016;85:375–404.
pubmed: 27145840 doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060815-014710
Avantaggiati ML, Ogryzko V, Gardner K, Giordano A, Levine AS, Kelly K. Recruitment of p300/CBP in p53-dependent signal pathways. Cell. 1997;89:1175–84.
pubmed: 9215639 doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80304-9
Lill NL, Grossman SR, Ginsberg D, DeCaprio J, Livingston DM. Binding and modulation of p53 by p300/CBP coactivators. Nature. 1997;387:823–7.
pubmed: 9194565 doi: 10.1038/42981
Scolnick DM, Chehab NH, Stavridi ES, Lien MC, Caruso L, Moran E, et al. CREB-binding protein and p300/CBP-associated factor are transcriptional coactivators of the p53 tumor suppressor protein. Cancer Res. 1997;57:3693–6.
pubmed: 9288775
Grossman SR, Perez M, Kung AL, Joseph M, Mansur C, Xiao ZX, et al. p300/MDM2 complexes participate in MDM2-mediated p53 degradation. Mol Cell. 1998;2:405–15.
pubmed: 9809062 doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80140-9
Wadgaonkar R, Phelps KM, Haque Z, Williams AJ, Silverman ES, Collins T. CREB-binding protein is a nuclear integrator of nuclear factor-kappaB and p53 signaling. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:1879–82.
pubmed: 9890939 doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.4.1879
Buschmann T, Adler V, Matusevich E, Fuchs SY, Ronai Z. p53 phosphorylation and association with murine double minute 2, c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase, p14ARF, and p300/CBP during the cell cycle and after exposure to ultraviolet irradiation. Cancer Res. 2000;60:896–900.
pubmed: 10706102
Yang XJ, Ogryzko VV, Nishikawa J, Howard BH, Nakatani Y. A p300/CBP-associated factor that competes with the adenoviral oncoprotein E1A. Nature. 1996;382:319–24.
pubmed: 8684459 doi: 10.1038/382319a0
Liu L, Scolnick DM, Trievel RC, Zhang HB, Marmorstein R, Halazonetis TD, et al. p53 sites acetylated in vitro by PCAF and p300 are acetylated in vivo in response to DNA damage. Mol Cell Biol. 1999;19:1202–9.
pubmed: 9891054 pmcid: 116049 doi: 10.1128/MCB.19.2.1202
Sakaguchi K, Herrera JE, Saito S, Miki T, Bustin M, Vassilev A, et al. DNA damage activates p53 through a phosphorylation-acetylation cascade. Genes Dev. 1998;12:2831–41.
pubmed: 9744860 pmcid: 317174 doi: 10.1101/gad.12.18.2831
Sykes SM, Mellert HS, Holbert MA, Li K, Marmorstein R, Lane WS, et al. Acetylation of the p53 DNA-binding domain regulates apoptosis induction. Mol Cell. 2006;24:841–51.
pubmed: 17189187 pmcid: 1766330 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.11.026
Li X, Wu L, Corsa CA, Kunkel S, Dou Y. Two mammalian MOF complexes regulate transcription activation by distinct mechanisms. Mol Cell. 2009;36:290–301.
pubmed: 19854137 pmcid: 2768600 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.07.031
Rokudai S, Laptenko O, Arnal SM, Taya Y, Kitabayashi I, Prives C. MOZ increases p53 acetylation and premature senescence through its complex formation with PML. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:3895–900.
pubmed: 23431171 pmcid: 3593914 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1300490110
Wang YH, Tsay YG, Tan BC, Lo WY, Lee SC. Identification and characterization of a novel p300-mediated p53 acetylation site, lysine 305. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:25568–76.
pubmed: 12724314 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M212574200
Joubel A, Chalkley RJ, Medzihradszky KF, Hondermarck H, Burlingame AL. Identification of new p53 acetylation sites in COS-1 cells. Mol Cell Proteom. 2009;8:1167–73.
doi: 10.1074/mcp.M800487-MCP200
Luo J, Su F, Chen D, Shiloh A, Gu W. Deacetylation of p53 modulates its effect on cell growth and apoptosis. Nature. 2000;408:377–81.
pubmed: 11099047 doi: 10.1038/35042612
Luo J, Nikolaev AY, Imai S, Chen D, Su F, Shiloh A, et al. Negative control of p53 by Sir2alpha promotes cell survival under stress. Cell. 2001;107:137–48.
pubmed: 11672522 doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00524-4
Vaziri H, Dessain SK, Ng Eaton E, Imai SI, Frye RA, Pandita TK, et al. hSIR2(SIRT1) functions as an NAD-dependent p53 deacetylase. Cell. 2001;107:149–59.
pubmed: 11672523 doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00527-X
Feng L, Lin T, Uranishi H, Gu W, Xu Y. Functional analysis of the roles of posttranslational modifications at the p53 C terminus in regulating p53 stability and activity. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25:5389–95.
pubmed: 15964796 pmcid: 1157004 doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.13.5389-5395.2005
Krummel KA, Lee CJ, Toledo F, Wahl GM. The C-terminal lysines fine-tune P53 stress responses in a mouse model but are not required for stability control or transactivation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:10188–93.
pubmed: 16006521 pmcid: 1177381 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0503068102
Simeonova I, Jaber S, Draskovic I, Bardot B, Fang M, Bouarich-Bourimi R, et al. Mutant mice lacking the p53 C-terminal domain model telomere syndromes. Cell Rep. 2013;3:2046–58.
pubmed: 23770245 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.05.028
Hamard PJ, Barthelery N, Hogstad B, Mungamuri SK, Tonnessen CA, Carvajal LA, et al. The C terminus of p53 regulates gene expression by multiple mechanisms in a target- and tissue-specific manner in vivo. Genes Dev. 2013;27:1868–85.
pubmed: 24013501 pmcid: 3778241 doi: 10.1101/gad.224386.113
Hupp TR, Meek DW, Midgley CA, Lane DP. Regulation of the specific DNA binding function of p53. Cell. 1992;71:875–86.
pubmed: 1423635 doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90562-Q
Hupp TR, Sparks A, Lane DP. Small peptides activate the latent sequence-specific DNA binding function of p53. Cell. 1995;83:237–45.
pubmed: 7585941 doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90165-5
Jayaraman J, Prives C. Activation of p53 sequence-specific DNA binding by short single strands of DNA requires the p53 C-terminus. Cell. 1995;81:1021–9.
pubmed: 7600571 doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(05)80007-8
Kon N, Churchill M, Li H, Mukherjee S, Manfredi JJ, Gu W. Robust p53 stabilization is dispensable for its activation and tumor suppressor function. Cancer Res. 2021;81:935–44.
pubmed: 33323382 doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-20-1804
Kon N, Gu W. p53 activation vs. stabilization: an acetylation tale from the C-terminal tail. Oncoscience. 2021;8:58–60.
pubmed: 33997110 pmcid: 8115982 doi: 10.18632/oncoscience.534
Knights CD, Catania J, Di Giovanni S, Muratoglu S, Perez R, Swartzbeck A, et al. Distinct p53 acetylation cassettes differentially influence gene-expression patterns and cell fate. J Cell Biol. 2006;173:533–44.
pubmed: 16717128 pmcid: 2063863 doi: 10.1083/jcb.200512059
Chao C, Wu Z, Mazur SJ, Borges H, Rossi M, Lin T, et al. Acetylation of mouse p53 at lysine 317 negatively regulates p53 apoptotic activities after DNA damage. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26:6859–69.
pubmed: 16943427 pmcid: 1592865 doi: 10.1128/MCB.00062-06
Montes de Oca Luna R, Wagner DS, Lozano G. Rescue of early embryonic lethality in mdm2-deficient mice by deletion of p53. Nature. 1995;378:203–6.
pubmed: 7477326 doi: 10.1038/378203a0
Kon N, Wang D, Li T, Jiang L, Qiang L, Gu W. Inhibition of Mdmx (Mdm4) in vivo induces anti-obesity effects. Oncotarget. 2018;9:7282–97.
pubmed: 29484110 pmcid: 5800902 doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.23837
Brady CA, Jiang D, Mello SS, Johnson TM, Jarvis LA, Kozak MM, et al. Distinct p53 transcriptional programs dictate acute DNA-damage responses and tumor suppression. Cell. 2011;145:571–83.
pubmed: 21565614 pmcid: 3259909 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.03.035
Valente LJ, Gray DH, Michalak EM, Pinon-Hofbauer J, Egle A, Scott CL, et al. p53 efficiently suppresses tumor development in the complete absence of its cell-cycle inhibitory and proapoptotic effectors p21, Puma, and Noxa. Cell Rep. 2013;3:1339–45.
pubmed: 23665218 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.04.012
Li T, Liu X, Jiang L, Manfredi J, Zha S, Gu W. Loss of p53-mediated cell-cycle arrest, senescence and apoptosis promotes genomic instability and premature aging. Oncotarget. 2016;7:11838–49.
pubmed: 26943586 pmcid: 4914251 doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7864
Liu Y, Gu W. The complexity of p53-mediated metabolic regulation in tumor suppression. Semin Cancer Biol. 2021.
Bensaad K, Tsuruta A, Selak MA, Vidal MN, Nakano K, Bartrons R, et al. TIGAR, a p53-inducible regulator of glycolysis and apoptosis. Cell. 2006;126:107–20.
pubmed: 16839880 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.05.036
Cheung EC, Ludwig RL, Vousden KH. Mitochondrial localization of TIGAR under hypoxia stimulates HK2 and lowers ROS and cell death. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:20491–6.
pubmed: 23185017 pmcid: 3528527 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1206530109
Cheung EC, Athineos D, Lee P, Ridgway RA, Lambie W, Nixon C, et al. TIGAR is required for efficient intestinal regeneration and tumorigenesis. Dev Cell. 2013;25:463–77.
pubmed: 23726973 pmcid: 3682186 doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2013.05.001
Cheung EC, DeNicola GM, Nixon C, Blyth K, Labuschagne CF, Tuveson DA, et al. Dynamic ROS control by TIGAR regulates the initiation and progression of pancreatic cancer. Cancer Cell. 2020;37:168–82 e4.
pubmed: 31983610 pmcid: 7008247 doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.12.012
Assi M. The differential role of reactive oxygen species in early and late stages of cancer. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2017;313:R646–53.
pubmed: 28835450 doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00247.2017
Stockwell BR, Jiang X, Gu W. Emerging mechanisms and disease relevance of ferroptosis. Trends Cell Biol. 2020;30:478–90.
pubmed: 32413317 pmcid: 7230071 doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2020.02.009
Yang WS, Stockwell BR. Ferroptosis: death by lipid peroxidation. Trends Cell Biol. 2016;26:165–76.
pubmed: 26653790 doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2015.10.014
Jiang L, Hickman JH, Wang SJ, Gu W. Dynamic roles of p53-mediated metabolic activities in ROS-induced stress responses. Cell Cycle. 2015;14:2881–5.
pubmed: 26218928 pmcid: 4825584 doi: 10.1080/15384101.2015.1068479
Jennis M, Kung CP, Basu S, Budina-Kolomets A, Leu JI, Khaku S, et al. An African-specific polymorphism in the TP53 gene impairs p53 tumor suppressor function in a mouse model. Genes Dev. 2016;30:918–30.
pubmed: 27034505 pmcid: 4840298 doi: 10.1101/gad.275891.115
Leu JI, Murphy ME, George DL. Mechanistic basis for impaired ferroptosis in cells expressing the African-centric S47 variant of p53. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019;116:8390–6.
pubmed: 30962386 pmcid: 6486733 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1821277116
Badgley MA, Kremer DM, Maurer HC, DelGiorno KE, Lee HJ, Purohit V, et al. Cysteine depletion induces pancreatic tumor ferroptosis in mice. Science. 2020;368:85–9.
pubmed: 32241947 pmcid: 7681911 doi: 10.1126/science.aaw9872
Chu B, Kon N, Chen D, Li T, Liu T, Jiang L, et al. ALOX12 is required for p53-mediated tumour suppression through a distinct ferroptosis pathway. Nat Cell Biol. 2019;21:579–91.
pubmed: 30962574 pmcid: 6624840 doi: 10.1038/s41556-019-0305-6
Doll S, Proneth B, Tyurina YY, Panzilius E, Kobayashi S, Ingold I, et al. ACSL4 dictates ferroptosis sensitivity by shaping cellular lipid composition. Nat Chem Biol. 2017;13:91–8.
pubmed: 27842070 doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2239
Kagan VE, Mao G, Qu F, Angeli JP, Doll S, Croix CS, et al. Oxidized arachidonic and adrenic PEs navigate cells to ferroptosis. Nat Chem Biol. 2017;13:81–90.
pubmed: 27842066 doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2238
Gao M, Monian P, Quadri N, Ramasamy R, Jiang X. Glutaminolysis and transferrin regulate ferroptosis. Mol Cell. 2015;59:298–308.
pubmed: 26166707 pmcid: 4506736 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.06.011
Ou Y, Wang SJ, Li D, Chu B, Gu W. Activation of SAT1 engages polyamine metabolism with p53-mediated ferroptotic responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:E6806–12.
pubmed: 27698118 pmcid: 5098629 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1607152113
Zhang Y, Qian Y, Zhang J, Yan W, Jung YS, Chen M, et al. Ferredoxin reductase is critical for p53-dependent tumor suppression via iron regulatory protein 2. Genes Dev. 2017;31:1243–56.
pubmed: 28747430 pmcid: 5558926 doi: 10.1101/gad.299388.117
Liu Y, Gu W. p53 in ferroptosis regulation: the new weapon for the old guardian. Cell Death Differ. 2022.
Li M, Luo J, Brooks CL, Gu W. Acetylation of p53 inhibits its ubiquitination by Mdm2. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:50607–11.
pubmed: 12421820 doi: 10.1074/jbc.C200578200
Kruse JP, Gu W. Modes of p53 regulation. Cell. 2009;137:609–22.
pubmed: 19450511 pmcid: 3737742 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.04.050
Rodriguez MS, Desterro JM, Lain S, Lane DP, Hay RT. Multiple C-terminal lysine residues target p53 for ubiquitin-proteasome-mediated degradation. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20:8458–67.
pubmed: 11046142 pmcid: 102152 doi: 10.1128/MCB.20.22.8458-8467.2000
Ito A, Lai CH, Zhao X, Saito S, Hamilton MH, Appella E, et al. p300/CBP-mediated p53 acetylation is commonly induced by p53-activating agents and inhibited by MDM2. EMBO J. 2001;20:1331–40.
pubmed: 11250899 pmcid: 145533 doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.6.1331
Kobet E, Zeng X, Zhu Y, Keller D, Lu H. MDM2 inhibits p300-mediated p53 acetylation and activation by forming a ternary complex with the two proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:12547–52.
pubmed: 11070080 pmcid: 18801 doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.23.12547
Ito A, Kawaguchi Y, Lai CH, Kovacs JJ, Higashimoto Y, Appella E, et al. MDM2-HDAC1-mediated deacetylation of p53 is required for its degradation. EMBO J. 2002;21:6236–45.
pubmed: 12426395 pmcid: 137207 doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdf616
Fujisawa T, Filippakopoulos P. Functions of bromodomain-containing proteins and their roles in homeostasis and cancer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2017;18:246–62.
pubmed: 28053347 doi: 10.1038/nrm.2016.143
Barlev NA, Liu L, Chehab NH, Mansfield K, Harris KG, Halazonetis TD, et al. Acetylation of p53 activates transcription through recruitment of coactivators/histone acetyltransferases. Mol Cell. 2001;8:1243–54.
pubmed: 11779500 doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00414-2
Li AG, Piluso LG, Cai X, Gadd BJ, Ladurner AG, Liu X. An acetylation switch in p53 mediates holo-TFIID recruitment. Mol Cell. 2007;28:408–21.
pubmed: 17996705 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.09.006
Cai W, Su L, Liao L, Liu ZZ, Langbein L, Dulaimi E, et al. PBRM1 acts as a p53 lysine-acetylation reader to suppress renal tumor growth. Nat Commun. 2019;10:5800.
pubmed: 31863007 pmcid: 6925188 doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13608-1
Juillard F, de Miranda MP, Li S, Franco A, Seixas AF, Liu B, et al. KSHV LANA acetylation-selective acidic domain reader sequence mediates virus persistence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117:22443–51.
pubmed: 32820070 pmcid: 7486799 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2004809117
Meek DW, Anderson CW. Posttranslational modification of p53: cooperative integrators of function. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2009;1:a000950.
pubmed: 20457558 pmcid: 2882125 doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a000950
Lambert PF, Kashanchi F, Radonovich MF, Shiekhattar R, Brady JN. Phosphorylation of p53 serine 15 increases interaction with CBP. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:33048–53.
pubmed: 9830059 doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.49.33048
Kar S, Sakaguchi K, Shimohigashi Y, Samaddar S, Banerjee R, Basu G, et al. Effect of phosphorylation on the structure and fold of transactivation domain of p53. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:15579–85.
pubmed: 11854266 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M106915200
Teufel DP, Bycroft M, Fersht AR. Regulation by phosphorylation of the relative affinities of the N-terminal transactivation domains of p53 for p300 domains and Mdm2. Oncogene. 2009;28:2112–8.
pubmed: 19363523 pmcid: 2685776 doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.71
Jenkins LM, Yamaguchi H, Hayashi R, Cherry S, Tropea JE, Miller M, et al. Two distinct motifs within the p53 transactivation domain bind to the Taz2 domain of p300 and are differentially affected by phosphorylation. Biochemistry. 2009;48:1244–55.
pubmed: 19166313 doi: 10.1021/bi801716h
Lee CW, Ferreon JC, Ferreon AC, Arai M, Wright PE. Graded enhancement of p53 binding to CREB-binding protein (CBP) by multisite phosphorylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:19290–5.
pubmed: 20962272 pmcid: 2984141 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1013078107
Saito S, Goodarzi AA, Higashimoto Y, Noda Y, Lees-Miller SP, Appella E, et al. ATM mediates phosphorylation at multiple p53 sites, including Ser(46), in response to ionizing radiation. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:12491–4.
pubmed: 11875057 doi: 10.1074/jbc.C200093200
Hofmann TG, Moller A, Sirma H, Zentgraf H, Taya Y, Droge W, et al. Regulation of p53 activity by its interaction with homeodomain-interacting protein kinase-2. Nat Cell Biol. 2002;4:1–10.
pubmed: 11740489 doi: 10.1038/ncb715
Puca R, Nardinocchi L, Sacchi A, Rechavi G, Givol D, D’Orazi G. HIPK2 modulates p53 activity towards pro-apoptotic transcription. Mol Cancer. 2009;8:85.
pubmed: 19828042 pmcid: 2768676 doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-8-85
Rokudai S, Aikawa Y, Tagata Y, Tsuchida N, Taya Y, Kitabayashi I. Monocytic leukemia zinc finger (MOZ) interacts with p53 to induce p21 expression and cell-cycle arrest. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:237–44.
pubmed: 19001415 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M805101200
Shieh SY, Ikeda M, Taya Y, Prives C. DNA damage-induced phosphorylation of p53 alleviates inhibition by MDM2. Cell. 1997;91:325–34.
pubmed: 9363941 doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80416-X
Chehab NH, Malikzay A, Appel M, Halazonetis TD. Chk2/hCds1 functions as a DNA damage checkpoint in G(1) by stabilizing p53. Genes Dev. 2000;14:278–88.
pubmed: 10673500 pmcid: 316357 doi: 10.1101/gad.14.3.278
Ferreon JC, Lee CW, Arai M, Martinez-Yamout MA, Dyson HJ, Wright PE. Cooperative regulation of p53 by modulation of ternary complex formation with CBP/p300 and HDM2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:6591–6.
pubmed: 19357310 pmcid: 2672497 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0811023106
Ou YH, Chung PH, Sun TP, Shieh SY. p53 C-terminal phosphorylation by CHK1 and CHK2 participates in the regulation of DNA-damage-induced C-terminal acetylation. Mol Biol Cell. 2005;16:1684–95.
pubmed: 15659650 pmcid: 1073652 doi: 10.1091/mbc.e04-08-0689
Chuikov S, Kurash JK, Wilson JR, Xiao B, Justin N, Ivanov GS, et al. Regulation of p53 activity through lysine methylation. Nature. 2004;432:353–60.
pubmed: 15525938 doi: 10.1038/nature03117
Huang J, Perez-Burgos L, Placek BJ, Sengupta R, Richter M, Dorsey JA, et al. Repression of p53 activity by Smyd2-mediated methylation. Nature. 2006;444:629–32.
pubmed: 17108971 doi: 10.1038/nature05287
Shi X, Kachirskaia I, Yamaguchi H, West LE, Wen H, Wang EW, et al. Modulation of p53 function by SET8-mediated methylation at lysine 382. Mol Cell. 2007;27:636–46.
pubmed: 17707234 pmcid: 2693209 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.07.012
Ivanov GS, Ivanova T, Kurash J, Ivanov A, Chuikov S, Gizatullin F, et al. Methylation-acetylation interplay activates p53 in response to DNA damage. Mol Cell Biol. 2007;27:6756–69.
pubmed: 17646389 pmcid: 2099237 doi: 10.1128/MCB.00460-07
Kurash JK, Lei H, Shen Q, Marston WL, Granda BW, Fan H, et al. Methylation of p53 by Set7/9 mediates p53 acetylation and activity in vivo. Mol Cell. 2008;29:392–400.
pubmed: 18280244 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.12.025
Lehnertz B, Rogalski JC, Schulze FM, Yi L, Lin S, Kast J, et al. p53-dependent transcription and tumor suppression are not affected in Set7/9-deficient mice. Mol Cell. 2011;43:673–80.
pubmed: 21855805 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.08.006
Campaner S, Spreafico F, Burgold T, Doni M, Rosato U, Amati B, et al. The methyltransferase Set7/9 (Setd7) is dispensable for the p53-mediated DNA damage response in vivo. Mol Cell. 2011;43:681–8.
pubmed: 21855806 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.08.007
Rodriguez MS, Desterro JM, Lain S, Midgley CA, Lane DP, Hay RT. SUMO-1 modification activates the transcriptional response of p53. EMBO J. 1999;18:6455–61.
pubmed: 10562557 pmcid: 1171708 doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.22.6455
Gostissa M, Hengstermann A, Fogal V, Sandy P, Schwarz SE, Scheffner M, et al. Activation of p53 by conjugation to the ubiquitin-like protein SUMO-1. EMBO J. 1999;18:6462–71.
pubmed: 10562558 pmcid: 1171709 doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.22.6462
Fogal V, Gostissa M, Sandy P, Zacchi P, Sternsdorf T, Jensen K, et al. Regulation of p53 activity in nuclear bodies by a specific PML isoform. EMBO J. 2000;19:6185–95.
pubmed: 11080164 pmcid: 305840 doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.22.6185
Kwek SS, Derry J, Tyner AL, Shen Z, Gudkov AV. Functional analysis and intracellular localization of p53 modified by SUMO-1. Oncogene. 2001;20:2587–99.
pubmed: 11420669 doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204362
Carter S, Bischof O, Dejean A, Vousden KH. C-terminal modifications regulate MDM2 dissociation and nuclear export of p53. Nat Cell Biol. 2007;9:428–35.
pubmed: 17369817 doi: 10.1038/ncb1562
Naidu SR, Lakhter AJ, Androphy EJ. PIASy-mediated Tip60 sumoylation regulates p53-induced autophagy. Cell Cycle. 2012;11:2717–28.
pubmed: 22751435 pmcid: 3409012 doi: 10.4161/cc.21091
Hay RT. SUMO: a history of modification. Mol Cell. 2005;18:1–12.
pubmed: 15808504 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.03.012
Wu SY, Chiang CM. Crosstalk between sumoylation and acetylation regulates p53-dependent chromatin transcription and DNA binding. EMBO J. 2009;28:1246–59.
pubmed: 19339993 pmcid: 2683057 doi: 10.1038/emboj.2009.83
Xirodimas DP, Saville MK, Bourdon JC, Hay RT, Lane DP. Mdm2-mediated NEDD8 conjugation of p53 inhibits its transcriptional activity. Cell. 2004;118:83–97.
pubmed: 15242646 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.06.016
Abida WM, Nikolaev A, Zhao W, Zhang W, Gu W. FBXO11 promotes the Neddylation of p53 and inhibits its transcriptional activity. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:1797–804.
pubmed: 17098746 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M609001200
Quinn JJ, Chang HY. Unique features of long non-coding RNA biogenesis and function. Nat Rev Genet. 2016;17:47–62.
pubmed: 26666209 doi: 10.1038/nrg.2015.10
Statello L, Guo CJ, Chen LL, Huarte M. Author correction: Gene regulation by long non-coding RNAs and its biological functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2021;22:159.
pubmed: 33420484 pmcid: 8095262 doi: 10.1038/s41580-021-00330-4
Zhang A, Xu M, Mo YY. Role of the lncRNA-p53 regulatory network in cancer. J Mol Cell Biol. 2014;6:181–91.
pubmed: 24721780 pmcid: 4034727 doi: 10.1093/jmcb/mju013
Chaudhary R, Lal A. Long noncoding RNAs in the p53 network. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. 2017;8: https://doi.org/10.1002/wrna.1410 .
Lin T, Hou PF, Meng S, Chen F, Jiang T, Li ML, et al. Emerging roles of p53 related lncRNAs in cancer progression: a systematic review. Int J Biol Sci. 2019;15:1287–98.
pubmed: 31223287 pmcid: 6567798 doi: 10.7150/ijbs.33218
Chen R, Liu Y, Zhuang H, Yang B, Hei K, Xiao M, et al. Corrigendum to article “Quantitative proteomics reveals that long non-coding RNA MALAT1 interacts with DBC1 to regulate p53 acetylation”. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:4199–202.
pubmed: 33751109 pmcid: 8053087 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab222
Ma XY, Wang JH, Wang JL, Ma CX, Wang XC, Liu FS. Malat1 as an evolutionarily conserved lncRNA, plays a positive role in regulating proliferation and maintaining undifferentiated status of early-stage hematopoietic cells. BMC Genomics. 2015;16:676.
pubmed: 26335021 pmcid: 4559210 doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1881-x
Jiang L, Zawacka-Pankau J. The p53/MDM2/MDMX-targeted therapies-a clinical synopsis. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11:237.
pubmed: 32303678 pmcid: 7165174 doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-2445-9
Amodio N, Raimondi L, Juli G, Stamato MA, Caracciolo D, Tagliaferri P, et al. MALAT1: a druggable long non-coding RNA for targeted anti-cancer approaches. J Hematol Oncol. 2018;11:63.
pubmed: 29739426 pmcid: 5941496 doi: 10.1186/s13045-018-0606-4
Slack FJ, Chinnaiyan AM. The role of non-coding RNAs in oncology. Cell. 2019;179:1033–55.
pubmed: 31730848 pmcid: 7347159 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.10.017
Jiang MC, Ni JJ, Cui WY, Wang BY, Zhuo W. Emerging roles of lncRNA in cancer and therapeutic opportunities. Am J Cancer Res. 2019;9:1354–66.
pubmed: 31392074 pmcid: 6682721

Auteurs

Zhangchuan Xia (Z)

Institute for Cancer Genetics, and Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, 1130 Nicholas Ave, New York, NY, 10032, USA.

Ning Kon (N)

Institute for Cancer Genetics, and Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, 1130 Nicholas Ave, New York, NY, 10032, USA.

Alyssa P Gu (AP)

Institute for Cancer Genetics, and Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, 1130 Nicholas Ave, New York, NY, 10032, USA.

Omid Tavana (O)

Institute for Cancer Genetics, and Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, 1130 Nicholas Ave, New York, NY, 10032, USA.

Wei Gu (W)

Institute for Cancer Genetics, and Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, 1130 Nicholas Ave, New York, NY, 10032, USA. wg8@cumc.columbia.edu.
Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, 1130 Nicholas Ave, New York, NY, 10032, USA. wg8@cumc.columbia.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH