Disconnecting multicellular networks in brain tumours.
Journal
Nature reviews. Cancer
ISSN: 1474-1768
Titre abrégé: Nat Rev Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101124168
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2022
08 2022
Historique:
accepted:
24
03
2022
pubmed:
30
4
2022
medline:
29
7
2022
entrez:
29
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Cancer cells can organize and communicate in functional networks. Similarly to other networks in biology and sociology, these can be highly relevant for growth and resilience. In this Perspective, we demonstrate by the example of glioblastomas and other incurable brain tumours how versatile multicellular tumour networks are formed by two classes of long intercellular membrane protrusions: tumour microtubes and tunnelling nanotubes. The resulting networks drive tumour growth and resistance to standard therapies. This raises the question of how to disconnect brain tumour networks to halt tumour growth and whether this can make established therapies more effective. Emerging principles of tumour networks, their potential relevance for tumour types outside the brain and translational implications, including clinical trials that are already based on these discoveries, are discussed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35488036
doi: 10.1038/s41568-022-00475-0
pii: 10.1038/s41568-022-00475-0
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
481-491Informations de copyright
© 2022. Springer Nature Limited.
Références
Ostrom, Q. T. et al. CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2013–2017. Neuro Oncol. 22, iv1–iv96 (2020).
pubmed: 33123732
pmcid: 7596247
doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa200
Wen, P. Y. et al. Glioblastoma in adults: a Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) and European Society of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) consensus review on current management and future directions. Neuro Oncol. 22, 1073–1113 (2020).
pubmed: 32328653
pmcid: 7594557
doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa106
Hanahan, D. & Weinberg, R. A. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144, 646–674 (2011).
pubmed: 21376230
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013
Bissell, M. J. & Hines, W. C. Why don’t we get more cancer? A proposed role of the microenvironment in restraining cancer progression. Nat. Med. 17, 320–329 (2011).
pubmed: 21383745
pmcid: 3569482
doi: 10.1038/nm.2328
Egeblad, M., Nakasone, E. S. & Werb, Z. Tumors as organs: complex tissues that interface with the entire organism. Dev. Cell 18, 884–901 (2010).
pubmed: 20627072
pmcid: 2905377
doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.05.012
Osswald, M. et al. Brain tumour cells interconnect to a functional and resistant network. Nature 528, 93–98 (2015).
pubmed: 26536111
doi: 10.1038/nature16071
Jung, E. et al. Tweety-homolog 1 drives brain colonization of gliomas. J. Neurosci. 37, 6837–6850 (2017).
pubmed: 28607172
pmcid: 6705725
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3532-16.2017
Weil, S. et al. Tumor microtubes convey resistance to surgical lesions and chemotherapy in gliomas. Neuro Oncol. 19, 1316–1326 (2017).
pubmed: 28419303
pmcid: 5596180
doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nox070
Venkataramani, V. et al. Glutamatergic synaptic input to glioma cells drives brain tumour progression. Nature 573, 532–538 (2019).
pubmed: 31534219
doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1564-x
Xie, R. et al. Tumor cell network integration in glioma represents a stemness feature. Neuro Oncol. 23, 757–769 (2021).
pubmed: 33320195
doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa275
Gritsenko, P. G. et al. p120-catenin-dependent collective brain infiltration by glioma cell networks. Nat. Cell Biol. 22, 97–107 (2020).
pubmed: 31907411
pmcid: 6952556
doi: 10.1038/s41556-019-0443-x
Venkatesh, H. S. et al. Electrical and synaptic integration of glioma into neural circuits. Nature 573, 539–545 (2019).
pubmed: 31534222
pmcid: 7038898
doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1563-y
Schneider, M. et al. Meclofenamate causes loss of cellular tethering and decoupling of functional networks in glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol. 23, 1885–1897 (2021).
pubmed: 33864086
pmcid: 8563322
doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab092
Venkatesh, H. S. et al. Neuronal activity promotes glioma growth through neuroligin-3 secretion. Cell 161, 803–816 (2015).
pubmed: 25913192
pmcid: 4447122
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.012
Venkatesh, H. S. et al. Targeting neuronal activity-regulated neuroligin-3 dependency in high-grade glioma. Nature 549, 533–537 (2017).
pubmed: 28959975
pmcid: 5891832
doi: 10.1038/nature24014
Portela, M. et al. Glioblastoma cells vampirize WNT from neurons and trigger a JNK/MMP signaling loop that enhances glioblastoma progression and neurodegeneration. PLoS Biol. 17, e3000545 (2019).
pubmed: 31846454
pmcid: 6917273
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000545
Pan, Y. et al. NF1 mutation drives neuronal activity-dependent initiation of optic glioma. Nature 594, 277–282 (2021).
pubmed: 34040258
pmcid: 8346229
doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03580-6
Venkataramani, V. & Winkler, F. Activation of retinal neurons triggers tumour formation in cancer-prone mice. Nature 594, 179–180 (2021).
pubmed: 34040239
doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-01353-9
Zuelch, K. J. Brain Tumors: Their Biology and Pathology (English edition based on 2nd German edition; translated by A. B. Rothballer & J. Olszewski). (Springer, 1957).
Rustom, A., Saffrich, R., Markovic, I., Walther, P. & Gerdes, H. H. Nanotubular highways for intercellular organelle transport. Science 303, 1007–1010 (2004).
pubmed: 14963329
doi: 10.1126/science.1093133
Lou, E. et al. Tunneling nanotubes provide a unique conduit for intercellular transfer of cellular contents in human malignant pleural mesothelioma. PLoS ONE 7, e33093 (2012).
pubmed: 22427958
pmcid: 3302868
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033093
Thayanithy, V., Dickson, E. L., Steer, C., Subramanian, S. & Lou, E. Tumor-stromal cross talk: direct cell-to-cell transfer of oncogenic microRNAs via tunneling nanotubes. Transl. Res. 164, 359–365 (2014).
pubmed: 24929208
pmcid: 4242806
doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2014.05.011
Antanaviciute, I. et al. Long-distance communication between laryngeal carcinoma cells. PLoS ONE 9, e99196 (2014).
pubmed: 24945745
pmcid: 4063716
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099196
Saenz-de-Santa-Maria, I. et al. Control of long-distance cell-to-cell communication and autophagosome transfer in squamous cell carcinoma via tunneling nanotubes. Oncotarget 8, 20939–20960 (2017).
pubmed: 28423494
pmcid: 5400557
doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15467
Desir, S. et al. Chemotherapy-induced tunneling nanotubes mediate intercellular drug efflux in pancreatic cancer. Sci. Rep. 8 (2018).
Marlein, C. R. et al. NADPH oxidase-2 derived superoxide drives mitochondrial transfer from bone marrow stromal cells to leukemic blasts. Blood 130, 1649–1660 (2017).
pubmed: 28733324
doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-03-772939
Marlein, C. R. et al. CD38-driven mitochondrial trafficking promotes bioenergetic plasticity in multiple myeloma. Cancer Res. 79, 2285–2297 (2019).
pubmed: 30622116
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-0773
Linkous, A. et al. Modeling patient-derived glioblastoma with cerebral organoids. Cell Rep. 26, 3203–3211 e5 (2019).
pubmed: 30893594
pmcid: 6625753
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.02.063
Jung, E. et al. Tumor cell plasticity, heterogeneity, and resistance in crucial microenvironmental niches in glioma. Nat. Commun. 12, 1014 (2021).
pubmed: 33579922
pmcid: 7881116
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21117-3
Joseph, J. V. et al. TGF- promotes microtube formation in glioblastoma through thrombospondin 1. Neuro Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noab212 (2021).
doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab212
pubmed: 34351421
pmcid: 8972291
Skene, J. H. et al. A protein induced during nerve growth (GAP-43) is a major component of growth-cone membranes. Science 233, 783–786 (1986).
pubmed: 3738509
doi: 10.1126/science.3738509
Aigner, L. & Caroni, P. Absence of persistent spreading, branching, and adhesion in GAP-43-depleted growth cones. J. Cell Biol. 128, 647–660 (1995).
pubmed: 7860637
doi: 10.1083/jcb.128.4.647
Akers, R. F. & Routtenberg, A. Protein kinase-C phosphorylates a 47-Mr protein (F1) directly related to synaptic plasticity. Brain Res. 334, 147–151 (1985).
pubmed: 3158377
doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(85)90576-1
Grignaschi, G., Burbassi, S., Zennaro, E., Bendotti, C. & Cervo, L. A single high dose of cocaine induces behavioural sensitization and modifies mRNA encoding GluR1 and GAP-43 in rats. Eur. J. Neurosci. 20, 2833–2837 (2004).
pubmed: 15548228
doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03712.x
Rekart, J. L., Meiri, K. & Routtenberg, A. Hippocampal-dependent memory is impaired in heterozygous GAP-43 knockout mice. Hippocampus 15, 1–7 (2005).
pubmed: 15390153
doi: 10.1002/hipo.20045
Suzuki, M. The Drosophila tweety family: molecular candidates for large-conductance Ca2+-activated Cl- channels. Exp. Physiol. 91, 141–147 (2006).
pubmed: 16219661
doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.2005.031773
Stefaniuk, M., Swiech, L., Dzwonek, J. & Lukasiuk, K. Expression of Ttyh1, a member of the Tweety family in neurons in vitro and in vivo and its potential role in brain pathology. J. Neurochem. 115, 1183–1194 (2010).
pubmed: 20874767
doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.07023.x
Elia, L. P., Yamamoto, M., Zang, K. & Reichardt, L. F. p120 catenin regulates dendritic spine and synapse development through Rho-family GTPases and cadherins. Neuron 51, 43–56 (2006).
pubmed: 16815331
pmcid: 2587166
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.05.018
Massague, J. TGF beta signalling in context. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 13, 616–630 (2012).
pubmed: 22992590
pmcid: 4027049
doi: 10.1038/nrm3434
Knoferle, J. et al. TGF-beta 1 enhances neurite outgrowth via regulation of proteasome function and EFABP. Neurobiol. Dis. 38, 395–404 (2010).
pubmed: 20211260
doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2010.02.011
Tkach, M. & Thery, C. Communication by extracellular vesicles: where we are and where we need to go. Cell 164, 1226–1232 (2016).
pubmed: 26967288
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.043
Maas, S. L. N., Breakefield, X. O. & Weaver, A. M. Extracellular vesicles: unique intercellular delivery vehicles. Trends Cell Biol. 27, 172–188 (2017).
pubmed: 27979573
doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2016.11.003
Minciacchi, V. R. et al. Large oncosomes contain distinct protein cargo and represent a separate functional class of tumor-derived extracellular vesicles. Oncotarget 6, 11327–11341 (2015).
pubmed: 25857301
pmcid: 4484459
doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3598
Broekman, M. L. et al. Multidimensional communication in the microenvirons of glioblastoma. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 14, 482–495 (2018).
pubmed: 29985475
pmcid: 6425928
doi: 10.1038/s41582-018-0025-8
Pinto, G. et al. Patient-derived glioblastoma stem cells transfer mitochondria through tunneling nanotubes in tumor organoids. Biochemical J. 478, 21–39 (2021).
doi: 10.1042/BCJ20200710
Pinto, G., Brou, C. & Zurzolo, C. Tunneling nanotubes: the fuel of tumor progression? Trends Cancer 6, 874–888 (2020).
pubmed: 32471688
doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2020.04.012
Winkler, F. & Wick, W. Harmful networks in the brain and beyond. Science 359, 1100–1101 (2018).
pubmed: 29590028
doi: 10.1126/science.aar5555
Ljubojevic, N., Henderson, J. M. & Zurzolo, C. The ways of actin: why tunneling nanotubes are unique cell protrusions. Trends Cell Biol. 31, 130–142 (2021).
pubmed: 33309107
doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2020.11.008
Ariazi, J. et al. Tunneling nanotubes and gap junctions-their role in long-range intercellular communication during development, health, and disease conditions. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 10, 333 (2017).
pubmed: 29089870
pmcid: 5651011
doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2017.00333
Gerdes, H. H., Rustom, A. & Wang, X. Tunneling nanotubes, an emerging intercellular communication route in development. Mech. Dev. 130, 381–387 (2013).
pubmed: 23246917
doi: 10.1016/j.mod.2012.11.006
Inaba, M., Buszczak, M. & Yamashita, Y. M. Nanotubes mediate niche-stem-cell signalling in the Drosophila testis. Nature 523, 329–332 (2015).
pubmed: 26131929
pmcid: 4586072
doi: 10.1038/nature14602
Hitomi, M. et al. Differential connexin function enhances self-renewal in glioblastoma. Cell Rep. 11, 1031–1042 (2015).
pubmed: 25959821
pmcid: 4502443
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.04.021
Wang, J. et al. Targeting different domains of gap junction protein to control malignant glioma. Neuro Oncol. 20, 885–896 (2018).
pubmed: 29106645
doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nox207
Hong, X., Sin, W. C., Harris, A. L. & Naus, C. C. Gap junctions modulate glioma invasion by direct transfer of microRNA. Oncotarget 6, 15566–15577 (2015).
pubmed: 25978028
pmcid: 4558171
doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3904
Malmersjo, S., Rebellato, P., Smedler, E. & Uhlen, P. Small-world networks of spontaneous Ca
pubmed: 23986813
pmcid: 3742060
doi: 10.4161/cib.24788
Malmersjo, S. et al. Neural progenitors organize in small-world networks to promote cell proliferation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, E1524–E1532 (2013).
pubmed: 23576737
pmcid: 3631687
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1220179110
van den Bent, M. J. et al. Adjuvant procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine chemotherapy in newly diagnosed anaplastic oligodendroglioma: long-term follow-up of EORTC Brain Tumor Group study 26951. J. Clin. Oncol. 31, 344–350 (2013).
pubmed: 23071237
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.43.2229
Cairncross, G. et al. Phase III trial of chemoradiotherapy for anaplastic oligodendroglioma: long-term results of RTOG 9402. J. Clin. Oncol. 31, 337–343 (2013).
pubmed: 23071247
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.43.2674
Scherer, H. J. The forms of growth in gliomas and their practical significance. Brain 63, 1–35 (1940).
doi: 10.1093/brain/63.1.1
Bergles, D. E., Roberts, J. D., Somogyi, P. & Jahr, C. E. Glutamatergic synapses on oligodendrocyte precursor cells in the hippocampus. Nature 405, 187–191 (2000).
pubmed: 10821275
doi: 10.1038/35012083
Ohtaka-Maruyama, C. et al. Synaptic transmission from subplate neurons controls radial migration of neocortical neurons. Science 360, 313–317 (2018).
pubmed: 29674592
doi: 10.1126/science.aar2866
Zeng, Q. et al. Synaptic proximity enables NMDAR signalling to promote brain metastasis. Nature 573, 526–531 (2019).
pubmed: 31534217
pmcid: 6837873
doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1576-6
Kowianski, P. et al. BDNF: a key factor with multipotent impact on brain signaling and synaptic plasticity. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 38, 579–593 (2018).
pubmed: 28623429
doi: 10.1007/s10571-017-0510-4
Aabedi, A. A. et al. Functional alterations in cortical processing of speech in glioma-infiltrated cortex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118 (2021).
Guo, X. et al. Midkine activation of CD8
pubmed: 32358581
pmcid: 7195398
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15770-3
Drumm, M. R. et al. Extensive brainstem infiltration, not mass effect, is a common feature of end-stage cerebral glioblastomas. Neuro Oncol. 22, 470–479 (2020).
pubmed: 31711239
doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noz216
Sahm, F. et al. Addressing diffuse glioma as a systemic brain disease with single-cell analysis. Arch. Neurol. 69, 523–526 (2012).
pubmed: 22158715
doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2011.2910
Silbergeld, D. L. & Chicoine, M. R. Isolation and characterization of human malignant glioma cells from histologically normal brain. J. Neurosurg. 86, 525–531 (1997).
pubmed: 9046311
doi: 10.3171/jns.1997.86.3.0525
Giese, A., Bjerkvig, R., Berens, M. E. & Westphal, M. Cost of migration: invasion of malignant gliomas and implications for treatment. J. Clin. Oncol. 21, 1624–1636 (2003).
pubmed: 12697889
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.05.063
Darmanis, S. et al. Single-cell RNA-seq analysis of infiltrating neoplastic cells at the migrating front of human glioblastoma. Cell Rep. 21, 1399–1410 (2017).
pubmed: 29091775
pmcid: 5810554
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.10.030
Garofano, L. et al. Pathway-based classification of glioblastoma uncovers a mitochondrial subtype with therapeutic vulnerabilities. Nat. Cancer 2, 141–156 (2021).
pubmed: 33681822
pmcid: 7935068
doi: 10.1038/s43018-020-00159-4
Monje, M. et al. Roadmap for the emerging field of cancer neuroscience. Cell 181, 219–222 (2020).
pubmed: 32302564
pmcid: 7286095
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.034
Weller, M. et al. Glioma. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 1, 15017 (2015).
pubmed: 27188790
doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2015.17
Patel, A. P. et al. Single-cell RNA-seq highlights intratumoral heterogeneity in primary glioblastoma. Science 344, 1396–1401 (2014).
pubmed: 24925914
pmcid: 4123637
doi: 10.1126/science.1254257
Tirosh, I. et al. Single-cell RNA-seq supports a developmental hierarchy in human oligodendroglioma. Nature 539, 309–313 (2016).
pubmed: 27806376
pmcid: 5465819
doi: 10.1038/nature20123
Le, H. T. et al. Gap junction intercellular communication mediated by connexin43 in astrocytes is essential for their resistance to oxidative stress. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 1345–1354 (2014).
pubmed: 24302722
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.508390
Tombal, B., Denmeade, S. R., Gillis, J. M. & Isaacs, J. T. A supramicromolar elevation of intracellular free calcium ([Ca
pubmed: 11973614
doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4400999
Sofroniew, M. V. & Vinters, H. V. Astrocytes: biology and pathology. Acta Neuropathol. 119, 7–35 (2010).
pubmed: 20012068
doi: 10.1007/s00401-009-0619-8
Murphy, S. F. et al. Connexin 43 inhibition sensitizes chemoresistant glioblastoma cells to temozolomide. Cancer Res. 76, 139–149 (2016).
pubmed: 26542214
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-1286
Senft, C. et al. Intraoperative MRI guidance and extent of resection in glioma surgery: a randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 12, 997–1003 (2011).
pubmed: 21868284
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70196-6
Stummer, W. et al. Fluorescence-guided surgery with 5-aminolevulinic acid for resection of malignant glioma: a randomised controlled multicentre phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 7, 392–401 (2006).
pubmed: 16648043
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70665-9
Konishi, Y., Muragaki, Y., Iseki, H., Mitsuhashi, N. & Okada, Y. Patterns of intracranial glioblastoma recurrence after aggressive surgical resection and adjuvant management: retrospective analysis of 43 cases. Neurol. Med. Chir. 52, 577–586 (2012).
doi: 10.2176/nmc.52.577
Petrecca, K., Guiot, M. C., Panet-Raymond, V. & Souhami, L. Failure pattern following complete resection plus radiotherapy and temozolomide is at the resection margin in patients with glioblastoma. J. Neurooncol. 111, 19–23 (2013).
pubmed: 23054563
doi: 10.1007/s11060-012-0983-4
Richards, L. M. et al. Gradient of developmental and injury response transcriptional states defines functional vulnerabilities underpinning glioblastoma heterogeneity. Nat. Cancer 2, 157–173 (2021).
pubmed: 35122077
doi: 10.1038/s43018-020-00154-9
Horne, E. et al. A brain-penetrant microtubule-targeting agent that disrupts hallmarks of glioma tumorigenesis. Neurooncol. Adv. 3, vdaa165 (2020).
pubmed: 33506204
pmcid: 7813200
Osswald, M., Solecki, G., Wick, W. & Winkler, F. A malignant cellular network in gliomas: potential clinical implications. Neuro Oncol. 18, 479–485 (2016).
pubmed: 26995789
pmcid: 4799690
doi: 10.1093/neuonc/now014
Westhoff, M. A., Zhou, S., Bachem, M. G., Debatin, K. M. & Fulda, S. Identification of a novel switch in the dominant forms of cell adhesion-mediated drug resistance in glioblastoma cells. Oncogene 27, 5169–5181 (2008).
pubmed: 18469856
doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.148
Munoz, J. L. et al. Temozolomide resistance in glioblastoma cells occurs partly through epidermal growth factor receptor-mediated induction of connexin 43. Cell Death Dis. 5, e1145 (2014).
pubmed: 24675463
pmcid: 3973225
doi: 10.1038/cddis.2014.111
Potthoff, A. L. et al. Inhibition of gap junctions sensitizes primary glioblastoma cells for temozolomide. Cancers 11, 858 (2019).
pmcid: 6628126
doi: 10.3390/cancers11060858
Schneider, M. et al. Inhibition of intercellular cytosolic traffic via gap junctions reinforces lomustine-induced toxicity in glioblastoma independent of MGMT promoter methylation status. Pharmaceuticals 14, 195 (2021).
doi: 10.3390/ph14030195
Wallenstein, M. C. & Mauss, E. A. Effect of prostaglandin synthetase inhibitors on experimentally induced convulsions in rats. Pharmacology 29, 85–93 (1984).
pubmed: 6433367
doi: 10.1159/000137996
Zeyen, T. et al. Phase I/II trial of meclofenamate in progressive MGMT-methylated glioblastoma under temozolomide second-line therapy — the MecMeth/NOA-24 trial. Trials 23, 57 (2022).
pubmed: 35045869
pmcid: 8767701
doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05977-0
Happold, C. et al. Does valproic acid or levetiracetam improve survival in glioblastoma? A pooled analysis of prospective clinical trials in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 34, 731–739 (2016).
pubmed: 26786929
pmcid: 5070573
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.6563
Krauze, A. V. et al. The addition of valproic acid to concurrent radiation therapy and temozolomide improves patient outcome: a correlative analysis of RTOG 0525, SEER and a phase II NCI trial. Cancer Stud. Ther. https://doi.org/10.31038/cst.2020511 (2020).
doi: 10.31038/cst.2020511
pubmed: 34621499
pmcid: 8494241
Venkataramani, V., Tanev, D. I., Kuner, T., Wick, W. & Winkler, F. Synaptic input to brain tumors: clinical implications. Neuro Oncol. 23, 23–33 (2020).
pmcid: 7850064
doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa158
Vecht, C. et al. Seizure response to perampanel in drug-resistant epilepsy with gliomas: early observations. J. Neurooncol. 133, 603–607 (2017).
pubmed: 28492978
doi: 10.1007/s11060-017-2473-1
Kickingereder, P. et al. Automated quantitative tumour response assessment of MRI in neuro-oncology with artificial neural networks: a multicentre, retrospective study. Lancet Oncol. 20, 728–740 (2019).
pubmed: 30952559
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30098-1
Iwamoto, F. M. et al. Phase 2 trial of talampanel, a glutamate receptor inhibitor, for adults with recurrent malignant gliomas. Cancer 116, 1776–1782 (2010).
pubmed: 20143438
doi: 10.1002/cncr.24957
Grossman, S. A. et al. Talampanel with standard radiation and temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a multicenter phase II trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 27, 4155–4161 (2009).
pubmed: 19636006
pmcid: 2734427
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.6895
Rogawski, M. A. & Hanada, T. Preclinical pharmacology of perampanel, a selective non-competitive AMPA receptor antagonist. Acta Neurol. Scand. 127 (Suppl. 197), 19–24 (2013).
doi: 10.1111/ane.12100
Gidal, B. E., Ferry, J., Majid, O. & Hussein, Z. Concentration-effect relationships with perampanel in patients with pharmacoresistant partial-onset seizures. Epilepsia 54, 1490–1497 (2013).
pubmed: 23772853
doi: 10.1111/epi.12240
Henley, J. M. & Wilkinson, K. A. Synaptic AMPA receptor composition in development, plasticity and disease. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 17, 337–350 (2016).
pubmed: 27080385
doi: 10.1038/nrn.2016.37
Seol, M. & Kuner, T. Ionotropic glutamate receptor GluA4 and T-type calcium channel Cav 3.1 subunits control key aspects of synaptic transmission at the mouse L5B-POm giant synapse. Eur. J. Neurosci. 42, 3033–3044 (2015).
pubmed: 26390982
pmcid: 5063118
doi: 10.1111/ejn.13084
Iino, M. et al. Glia-synapse interaction through Ca
pubmed: 11340205
doi: 10.1126/science.1058827
Gmiro, V. E., Serdyuk, S. E. & Efremov, O. M. Peripheral and central routes of administration of quaternary ammonium compound IEM-1460 are equally potent in reducing the severity of nicotine-induced seizures in mice. Bull. Exp. Biol. Med. 146, 18–21 (2008).
pubmed: 19145339
doi: 10.1007/s10517-008-0229-9
US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04295759 (2020).
Christopherson, K. S. et al. Thrombospondins are astrocyte-secreted proteins that promote CNS synaptogenesis. Cell 120, 421–433 (2005).
pubmed: 15707899
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.12.020
Yu, K. et al. PIK3CA variants selectively initiate brain hyperactivity during gliomagenesis. Nature 578, 166–171 (2020).
pubmed: 31996845
pmcid: 7577741
doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-1952-2
Eroglu, C. et al. Gabapentin receptor alpha2delta-1 is a neuronal thrombospondin receptor responsible for excitatory CNS synaptogenesis. Cell 139, 380–392 (2009).
pubmed: 19818485
pmcid: 2791798
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.09.025
Pine, A. R. et al. Tumor microenvironment is critical for the maintenance of cellular states found in primary glioblastomas. Cancer Discov. 10, 964–979 (2020).
pubmed: 32253265
doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-0057
Hara, T. et al. Interactions between cancer cells and immune cells drive transitions to mesenchymal-like states in glioblastoma. Cancer Cell 39, 779–792.e11 (2021).
pubmed: 34087162
pmcid: 8366750
doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2021.05.002
Brennan, C. W. et al. The somatic genomic landscape of glioblastoma. Cell 155, 462–477 (2013).
pubmed: 24120142
pmcid: 3910500
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.09.034
Network, B. I. C. C. A multimodal cell census and atlas of the mammalian primary motor cortex. Nature 598, 86–102 (2021).
doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03950-0
Latario, C. J. et al. Tumor microtubes connect pancreatic cancer cells in an Arp2/3 complex-dependent manner. Mol. Biol. Cell 31, 1259–1272 (2020).
pubmed: 32267199
pmcid: 7353147
doi: 10.1091/mbc.E19-11-0605
Axelrod, R., Axelrod, D. E. & Pienta, K. J. Evolution of cooperation among tumor cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. Usa. 103, 13474–13479 (2006).
pubmed: 16938860
pmcid: 1557388
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0606053103
Archetti, M. & Pienta, K. J. Cooperation among cancer cells: applying game theory to cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 19, 110–117 (2019).
pubmed: 30470829
doi: 10.1038/s41568-018-0083-7
Vishwakarma, M. & Piddini, E. Outcompeting cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 20, 187–198 (2020).
pubmed: 31932757
doi: 10.1038/s41568-019-0231-8
Wen, P. Y. et al. Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. J. Clin. Oncol. 28, 1963–1972 (2010).
pubmed: 20231676
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.3541
Schneider, M. et al. Surgery for temporal glioblastoma: lobectomy outranks oncosurgical-based gross-total resection. J. Neurooncol 145, 143–150 (2019).
pubmed: 31485921
doi: 10.1007/s11060-019-03281-1
Pasquier, J. et al. Preferential transfer of mitochondria from endothelial to cancer cells through tunneling nanotubes modulates chemoresistance. J. Transl. Med. 11, 94 (2013).
pubmed: 23574623
pmcid: 3668949
doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-11-94
Burtey, A. et al. Intercellular transfer of transferrin receptor by a contact-, Rab8-dependent mechanism involving tunneling nanotubes. FASEB J. 29, 4695–4712 (2015).
pubmed: 26220176
doi: 10.1096/fj.14-268615
Rimkute, L. et al. The role of neural connexins in HeLa cell mobility and intercellular communication through tunneling tubes. BMC Cell Biol. 17, 3 (2016).
pubmed: 26758208
pmcid: 4710989
doi: 10.1186/s12860-016-0080-1
Desir, S. et al. Intercellular transfer of oncogenic KRAS via tunneling nanotubes introduces intracellular mutational heterogeneity in colon cancer cells. Cancers 11, 892 (2019).
pmcid: 6678395
doi: 10.3390/cancers11070892
Ady, J. W. et al. Intercellular communication in malignant pleural mesothelioma: properties of tunneling nanotubes. Front. Physiol. 5, 400 (2014).
pubmed: 25400582
pmcid: 4215694
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00400
Thayanithy, V. et al. Tumor exosomes induce tunneling nanotubes in lipid raft-enriched regions of human mesothelioma cells. Exp. Cell Res. 323, 178–188 (2014).
pubmed: 24468420
pmcid: 4159162
doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2014.01.014
Desir, S. et al. Tunneling nanotube formation is stimulated by hypoxia in ovarian cancer cells. Oncotarget 7, 43150–43161 (2016).
pubmed: 27223082
pmcid: 5190014
doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.9504
Kretschmer, A. et al. Stress-induced tunneling nanotubes support treatment adaptation in prostate cancer. Sci. Rep. 9, 7826 (2019).
pubmed: 31127190
pmcid: 6534589
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44346-5
Lu, J. et al. Tunneling nanotubes promote intercellular mitochondria transfer followed by increased invasiveness in bladder cancer cells. Oncotarget 8, 15539–15552 (2017).
pubmed: 28107184
pmcid: 5362504
doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14695
Polak, R., de Rooij, B., Pieters, R. & den Boer, M. L. B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells use tunneling nanotubes to orchestrate their microenvironment. Blood 126, 2404–2414 (2015).
pubmed: 26297738
doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-03-634238
Wang, J. et al. Cell adhesion-mediated mitochondria transfer contributes to mesenchymal stem cell-induced chemoresistance on T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells. J. Hematol. Oncol. 11, 11 (2018).
pubmed: 29357914
pmcid: 5778754
doi: 10.1186/s13045-018-0554-z
Wang, X. & Gerdes, H. H. Transfer of mitochondria via tunneling nanotubes rescues apoptotic PC12 cells. Cell Death Differ. 22, 1181–1191 (2015).
pubmed: 25571977
pmcid: 4572865
doi: 10.1038/cdd.2014.211
Bukoreshtliev, N. V. et al. Selective block of tunneling nanotube (TNT) formation inhibits intercellular organelle transfer between PC12 cells. FEBS Lett. 583, 1481–1488 (2009).
pubmed: 19345217
doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.03.065
Wang, X., Bukoreshtliev, N. V. & Gerdes, H. H. Developing neurons form transient nanotubes facilitating electrical coupling and calcium signaling with distant astrocytes. PLoS ONE 7, e47429 (2012).
pubmed: 23071805
pmcid: 3469499
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047429
Berendsen, S. et al. Prognostic relevance of epilepsy at presentation in glioblastoma patients. Neuro Oncol. 18, 700–706 (2016).
pubmed: 26420896
doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nov238
van Breemen, M. S., Wilms, E. B. & Vecht, C. J. Epilepsy in patients with brain tumours: epidemiology, mechanisms, and management. Lancet Neurol. 6, 421–430 (2007).
pubmed: 17434097
doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70103-5
Mastall, M. et al. Survival of brain tumour patients with epilepsy. Brain 44, 3322–3327 (2021).
doi: 10.1093/brain/awab188
Buckingham, S. C. et al. Glutamate release by primary brain tumors induces epileptic activity. Nat. Med. 17, 1269–1274 (2011).
pubmed: 21909104
pmcid: 3192231
doi: 10.1038/nm.2453
de Groot, J. & Sontheimer, H. Glutamate and the biology of gliomas. Glia 59, 1181–1189 (2011).
pubmed: 21192095
doi: 10.1002/glia.21113
Hatcher, A. et al. Pathogenesis of peritumoral hyperexcitability in an immunocompetent CRISPR-based glioblastoma model. J. Clin. Invest. 130, 2286–2300 (2020).
pubmed: 32250339
pmcid: 7190940
doi: 10.1172/JCI133316
Chung, W. J. et al. Inhibition of cystine uptake disrupts the growth of primary brain tumors. J. Neurosci. 25, 7101–7110 (2005).
pubmed: 16079392
pmcid: 2681064
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5258-04.2005
Aabedi, A. A. Functional alterations in cortical processing of speech in glioma-infiltrated cortex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2108959118 (2021).
pubmed: 34753819
pmcid: 8609626
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2108959118