Cost-effectiveness of ticagrelor in patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease: a European economic evaluation of the THEMIS trial.
Coronary artery disease
Cost–effectiveness
Percutaneous coronary intervention
Ticagrelor
Type 2 diabetes
Journal
European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy
ISSN: 2055-6845
Titre abrégé: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101669491
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 12 2022
02 12 2022
Historique:
received:
08
10
2021
revised:
15
02
2022
accepted:
27
04
2022
pubmed:
1
5
2022
medline:
6
12
2022
entrez:
30
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To conduct a health economic evaluation of ticagrelor in patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease (CAD) from a multinational payer perspective. Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of ticagrelor were evaluated in the overall effect of Ticagrelor on Health Outcomes in Diabetes Mellitus Patients Intervention Study (THEMIS) trial population and in the predefined patient group with prior percutaneous coronary intervention. A Markov model was developed to extrapolate patient outcomes over a lifetime horizon. The primary outcome was incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), which were compared with conventional willingness-to-pay thresholds [€47 000/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) in Sweden and €30 000/QALY in other countries].Treatment with ticagrelor resulted in QALY gains of up to 0.045 in the overall population and 0.099 in patients with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Increased costs and benefits translated to ICERs ranged between €27 894 and €42 252/QALY across Sweden, Germany, Italy, and Spain in the overall population. In patients with prior PCI, estimated ICERs improved to €18 449, €20 632, €20 233, and €13 228/QALY in Sweden, Germany, Italy, and Spain, respectively, driven by higher event rates and treatment benefit. Based on THEMIS results, ticagrelor plus aspirin compared with aspirin alone may be cost-effective in some European countries in patients with T2DM and CAD and no prior myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke. Additionally, ticagrelor is likely to be cost-effective across European countries in patients with a history of PCI.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35488865
pii: 6576325
doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvac032
pmc: PMC9716869
doi:
Substances chimiques
Aspirin
R16CO5Y76E
Ticagrelor
GLH0314RVC
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
777-785Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
Références
Clin Cardiol. 2019 May;42(5):498-505
pubmed: 30788847
Value Health Reg Issues. 2014 Sep;4:53-57
pubmed: 29702807
Circulation. 2015 Sep 8;132(10):923-31
pubmed: 26152709
Eur Heart J. 2014 Apr;35(13):844-52
pubmed: 24353280
Value Health. 2012 Jul-Aug;15(5):708-15
pubmed: 22867780
JAMA. 2004 Nov 24;292(20):2495-9
pubmed: 15562129
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018 Jun 8;17(1):83
pubmed: 29884191
JAMA. 2010 Sep 22;304(12):1350-7
pubmed: 20805624
Lancet. 2010 Jun 26;375(9733):2215-22
pubmed: 20609967
JAMA. 2007 Mar 21;297(11):1197-206
pubmed: 17374814
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 May 18;77(19):2366-2377
pubmed: 33985681
Circulation. 2021 Aug 24;144(8):655-658
pubmed: 34424771
Value Health. 2018 May;21(5):596-604
pubmed: 29753358
Eur Heart J. 2019 Nov 1;40(41):3378-3381
pubmed: 31545357
N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 3;381(14):1309-1320
pubmed: 31475798
Am Heart J. 2017 Apr;186:91-99
pubmed: 28454837
Value Health. 2013 Jul-Aug;16(5):814-22
pubmed: 23947975
Circulation. 2018 Apr 3;137(14):1429-1431
pubmed: 29610124
Health Econ. 2018 Apr;27(4):746-761
pubmed: 29282798
Pharmacoeconomics. 2015 Nov;33(11):1229-36
pubmed: 26093889
Lancet. 2019 Sep 28;394(10204):1169-1180
pubmed: 31484629
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2017 Aug;31(4):433-444
pubmed: 28866767
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Jun;36(6):663-674
pubmed: 29460066
Value Health. 2009 Sep;12(6):872-9
pubmed: 19490556
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Dec;14(12):e011035
pubmed: 34814698
Circulation. 2011 Jun 14;123(23):2736-47
pubmed: 21670242
Pharmacoeconomics. 2020 Aug;38(8):839-856
pubmed: 32307663
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 3;9(4):e027199
pubmed: 30948612
JAMA. 2006 Jan 11;295(2):180-9
pubmed: 16403930