Exploring reasons for MD-PhD trainees' experiences of impostor phenomenon.
Clinical-scientist
Impostor phenomenon
MD-PhD training
Medical education
Physician-scientist
Professional identity formation
bias and micro-aggressions
Journal
BMC medical education
ISSN: 1472-6920
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Educ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088679
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Apr 2022
30 Apr 2022
Historique:
received:
21
08
2021
accepted:
30
03
2022
entrez:
30
4
2022
pubmed:
1
5
2022
medline:
4
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Acceptance into U.S. MD-PhD dual-degree programs is highly competitive, and the lengthy training program requires transitioning between multiple phases (pre-clinical-, PhD-research-, and clinical-training phases), which can be stressful. Challenges faced during MD-PhD training could exacerbate self-doubt and anxiety. Impostor phenomenon is the experience of feeling like a fraud, with some high-achieving, competent individuals attributing their successes to luck or other factors rather than their own ability and hard work. To our knowledge, impostor phenomenon among MD-PhD trainees has not been described. This study examined impostor phenomenon experiences during MD-PhD training and reasons trainees attributed to these feelings. Individuals in science and medicine fields participated in an online survey that included the 20-item Clance Impostor Phenomenon Scale (CIPS); higher scores (range 20-100) indicate more frequent impostor phenomenon. Some respondents who reported experiencing impostor phenomenon also voluntarily completed a semi-structured interview, sharing experiences during training that contributed to feelings of impostor phenomenon. Interview transcripts were coded and analysed using the constant comparative method and analytic induction to identify themes. Of 959 survey respondents (students and professionals in science and medicine), 13 MD-PhD students and residents completed the survey, nine of whom (five male, four female; four white, five other race-ethnicity) also completed an interview. These participants experienced moderate-to-intense scores on the CIPS (range: 46-96). Four themes emerged from the interview narratives that described participants' experiences of IP: professional identity formation, fear of evaluation, minority status, and, program-transition experiences. All reported struggling to develop a physician-scientist identity and lacking a sense of belonging in medicine or research. Impostor experiences that MD-PhD participants attributed to bias and micro-aggressions in social interactions with peers, faculty, and patients challenged their professional identity formation as physician-scientists. It is important to further examine how MD-PhD-program structures, cultures, and social interactions can lead to feelings of alienation and experiences of impostor phenomenon, particularly for students from diverse and underrepresented populations in medicine.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Acceptance into U.S. MD-PhD dual-degree programs is highly competitive, and the lengthy training program requires transitioning between multiple phases (pre-clinical-, PhD-research-, and clinical-training phases), which can be stressful. Challenges faced during MD-PhD training could exacerbate self-doubt and anxiety. Impostor phenomenon is the experience of feeling like a fraud, with some high-achieving, competent individuals attributing their successes to luck or other factors rather than their own ability and hard work. To our knowledge, impostor phenomenon among MD-PhD trainees has not been described. This study examined impostor phenomenon experiences during MD-PhD training and reasons trainees attributed to these feelings.
METHODS
METHODS
Individuals in science and medicine fields participated in an online survey that included the 20-item Clance Impostor Phenomenon Scale (CIPS); higher scores (range 20-100) indicate more frequent impostor phenomenon. Some respondents who reported experiencing impostor phenomenon also voluntarily completed a semi-structured interview, sharing experiences during training that contributed to feelings of impostor phenomenon. Interview transcripts were coded and analysed using the constant comparative method and analytic induction to identify themes.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Of 959 survey respondents (students and professionals in science and medicine), 13 MD-PhD students and residents completed the survey, nine of whom (five male, four female; four white, five other race-ethnicity) also completed an interview. These participants experienced moderate-to-intense scores on the CIPS (range: 46-96). Four themes emerged from the interview narratives that described participants' experiences of IP: professional identity formation, fear of evaluation, minority status, and, program-transition experiences. All reported struggling to develop a physician-scientist identity and lacking a sense of belonging in medicine or research.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Impostor experiences that MD-PhD participants attributed to bias and micro-aggressions in social interactions with peers, faculty, and patients challenged their professional identity formation as physician-scientists. It is important to further examine how MD-PhD-program structures, cultures, and social interactions can lead to feelings of alienation and experiences of impostor phenomenon, particularly for students from diverse and underrepresented populations in medicine.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35490228
doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03396-6
pii: 10.1186/s12909-022-03396-6
pmc: PMC9055705
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
333Subventions
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 GM085350
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : T32 GM113896
Pays : United States
Organisme : National Institutes of Health National Institute of General Medical Sciences
ID : R01 GM085350; PI: DB Jeffe
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : T32GM113896; PI: JE Cavazos
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Dec;19(6):e43
pubmed: 20513788
Fam Med. 2004 Apr;36(4):248-52
pubmed: 15057614
Acad Med. 2018 May;93(5):763-768
pubmed: 29116983
J Couns Psychol. 2017 Mar;64(2):155-166
pubmed: 28182493
Med Educ. 2011 Oct;45(10):1006-15
pubmed: 21916940
Med Educ Online. 2011;16:
pubmed: 21841905
J Surg Educ. 2022 Jan-Feb;79(1):102-106
pubmed: 34483061
Med Teach. 2019 Sep;41(9):1002-1006
pubmed: 30261797
Acad Med. 2013 Jun;88(6):745-7
pubmed: 23708597
Acad Med. 2012 Dec;87(12):1722-33
pubmed: 23095924
Med Educ. 2011 Jan;45(1):51-9
pubmed: 21155868
Acad Med. 2011 Aug;86(8):953-61
pubmed: 21694566
J Physician Assist Educ. 2018 Jun;29(2):126-128
pubmed: 29683917
Acad Med. 2020 Sep;95(9):1312-1314
pubmed: 32404607
Transl Res. 2010 Jan;155(1):1-2
pubmed: 20004354
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Aug;35(8):2499-2501
pubmed: 31654355
Med Educ. 2016 Oct;50(10):1054-64
pubmed: 27628722
Int J Dr Stud. 2020;15:461-483
pubmed: 33815015
J Dent Educ. 2020 Sep;84(9):1016-1024
pubmed: 32436247
Med Educ. 2017 May;51(5):498-510
pubmed: 28247495
JAMA. 2008 Sep 10;300(10):1165-73
pubmed: 18780845
Med Educ. 2006 Apr;40(4):314-21
pubmed: 16573666
Teach Learn Med. 2021 Jan-Mar;33(1):36-48
pubmed: 32634054
Acad Med. 2016 Dec;91(12):1612-1617
pubmed: 27254011
Med Sci Educ. 2019 Mar 14;29(2):493-497
pubmed: 34457506
Acad Med. 2015 Jun;90(6):718-25
pubmed: 25785682
Int J Med Educ. 2020 Apr 29;11:90-96
pubmed: 32356519
Acad Med. 2014 Jan;89(1):84-93
pubmed: 24280845
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2022 Mar;21(1):ar15
pubmed: 35225673
Mol Biol Cell. 2020 Nov 15;31(24):2640-2643
pubmed: 33180675
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 May;37(7):1794-1796
pubmed: 34159550
BMJ. 2000 Jan 8;320(7227):114-6
pubmed: 10625273
Acad Med. 2017 Oct;92(10):1382-1389
pubmed: 28767499
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Sep 7;1(5):e182723
pubmed: 30646179
Med Educ. 2020 Feb;54(2):116-124
pubmed: 31692028
JAMA. 2018 Sep 18;320(11):1131-1150
pubmed: 30326495
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2020 Apr 27;77(9):690-696
pubmed: 32201891
Acad Psychiatry. 2016 Jun;40(3):418-21
pubmed: 26152516
Int J Med Educ. 2016 Oct 31;7:364-369
pubmed: 27802178
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jul;23(7):1090-4
pubmed: 18612750
Fam Med. 2021 Feb;53(2):118-122
pubmed: 33566346
J Surg Educ. 2019 Jan - Feb;76(1):99-106
pubmed: 30122638
Arch Surg. 2012 Mar;147(3):212-7
pubmed: 22106247
Arch Fam Med. 1996 Feb;5(2):71-5
pubmed: 8601210
Acad Med. 2017 Oct;92(10):1390-1398
pubmed: 28658019
Acad Med. 2010 Apr;85(4):692-701
pubmed: 20186033
Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Nov;74(5):682-690
pubmed: 30879701
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021 Jan;30(1):90-102
pubmed: 32349608
J Clin Invest. 2020 Jan 2;130(1):17-19
pubmed: 31815735
Med Educ. 1998 Sep;32(5):456-64
pubmed: 10211285
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016 Summer;15(2):
pubmed: 27174583
Acad Med. 2011 May;86(5):591-8
pubmed: 21436668
Acad Med. 2014 Oct;89(10):1398-407
pubmed: 25006709
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2018 Sep;17(3):ar41
pubmed: 30040532